开放Unterschenkelfrakturen Gliedmaßenerhalts界限在III°

M. Diefenbeck, T. Mückley, G. Hofmann
{"title":"开放Unterschenkelfrakturen Gliedmaßenerhalts界限在III°","authors":"M. Diefenbeck, T. Mückley, G. Hofmann","doi":"10.1055/S-2004-821168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In III B and III C open tibial fractures (according to Gustilo) it is extremely difficult to decide if an attempt should be taken to salvage the extremity or to perform an amputation. To standardize the criteria for amputation different salvage scores (PSI, MESS, NISSSA, HFS'98) have been published in recent years. However, large trials failed to show a high clinical value of those scoring systems. Salvage scores can therefore not be used as the single criterion to decide how to treat a mangled leg. In doubt, an attempt to salvage the extremity should be taken. Following this initial surgery a second look procedure after 24 to 48 hours is planed. After the consultation of other specialist the definite decision has to be made. For the salvage procedure the patient should be transferred to a level I trauma center. Patients seem to have a better clinical and social outcome after primary amputation (0 -7 days after trauma) compared to secondary amputation (2 - 6 weeks after trauma).","PeriodicalId":75462,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Traumatologie","volume":"34 1","pages":"182-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/S-2004-821168","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grenzen des Gliedmaßenerhalts bei III° offenen Unterschenkelfrakturen\",\"authors\":\"M. Diefenbeck, T. Mückley, G. Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/S-2004-821168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In III B and III C open tibial fractures (according to Gustilo) it is extremely difficult to decide if an attempt should be taken to salvage the extremity or to perform an amputation. To standardize the criteria for amputation different salvage scores (PSI, MESS, NISSSA, HFS'98) have been published in recent years. However, large trials failed to show a high clinical value of those scoring systems. Salvage scores can therefore not be used as the single criterion to decide how to treat a mangled leg. In doubt, an attempt to salvage the extremity should be taken. Following this initial surgery a second look procedure after 24 to 48 hours is planed. After the consultation of other specialist the definite decision has to be made. For the salvage procedure the patient should be transferred to a level I trauma center. Patients seem to have a better clinical and social outcome after primary amputation (0 -7 days after trauma) compared to secondary amputation (2 - 6 weeks after trauma).\",\"PeriodicalId\":75462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aktuelle Traumatologie\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"182-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/S-2004-821168\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aktuelle Traumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-2004-821168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-2004-821168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在III B和III C型胫骨开放性骨折中(根据Gustilo的说法),很难决定是采取抢救四肢的措施还是进行截肢。为了规范截肢的标准,近年来已经发表了不同的救助评分(PSI, MESS, NISSSA, HFS'98)。然而,大型试验未能显示出这些评分系统的高临床价值。因此,救助分数不能作为决定如何治疗断腿的单一标准。如果有疑问,就应该尝试挽救这一极端。在初次手术之后,计划在24到48小时后进行第二次检查。在咨询了其他专家之后,必须做出明确的决定。对于抢救程序,患者应转移到一级创伤中心。与继发性截肢(创伤后2 - 6周)相比,初次截肢(创伤后0 -7天)的患者似乎有更好的临床和社会结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grenzen des Gliedmaßenerhalts bei III° offenen Unterschenkelfrakturen
In III B and III C open tibial fractures (according to Gustilo) it is extremely difficult to decide if an attempt should be taken to salvage the extremity or to perform an amputation. To standardize the criteria for amputation different salvage scores (PSI, MESS, NISSSA, HFS'98) have been published in recent years. However, large trials failed to show a high clinical value of those scoring systems. Salvage scores can therefore not be used as the single criterion to decide how to treat a mangled leg. In doubt, an attempt to salvage the extremity should be taken. Following this initial surgery a second look procedure after 24 to 48 hours is planed. After the consultation of other specialist the definite decision has to be made. For the salvage procedure the patient should be transferred to a level I trauma center. Patients seem to have a better clinical and social outcome after primary amputation (0 -7 days after trauma) compared to secondary amputation (2 - 6 weeks after trauma).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensemble Prediction of Job Resources to Improve System Performance for Slurm-Based HPC Systems. Knorpelschaden und Gonarthrose, Teil III Knorpelschaden und Gonarthrose, Teil V Knorpelschaden und Gonarthrose, Teil IV Die minimalinvasive antegrade elastische intramedulläre Nagelung (ESIN) bei dislozierten Klavikulaschaftfrakturen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1