{"title":"关于改进功效的建议","authors":"P. Heeg1","doi":"10.1055/s-2004-821237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a critical view of the available data and taking clinical experience into account, currently used antiseptics for prevention and treatment of wound infection are evaluated comparatively. Povidone-iodine and octenidine are considered more or less equivalent for acute wounds whether infected or colonized, whereas polihexanide is regarded as first choice for chronic wounds. In addition, an overview of active agents inappropriate for wound antisepsis is presented.","PeriodicalId":75462,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Traumatologie","volume":"34 1","pages":"225 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2004-821237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empfehlungen zur Wirkstoffauswahl für die Wundantiseptik*\",\"authors\":\"P. Heeg1\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2004-821237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a critical view of the available data and taking clinical experience into account, currently used antiseptics for prevention and treatment of wound infection are evaluated comparatively. Povidone-iodine and octenidine are considered more or less equivalent for acute wounds whether infected or colonized, whereas polihexanide is regarded as first choice for chronic wounds. In addition, an overview of active agents inappropriate for wound antisepsis is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aktuelle Traumatologie\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2004-821237\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aktuelle Traumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-821237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-821237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Empfehlungen zur Wirkstoffauswahl für die Wundantiseptik*
Based on a critical view of the available data and taking clinical experience into account, currently used antiseptics for prevention and treatment of wound infection are evaluated comparatively. Povidone-iodine and octenidine are considered more or less equivalent for acute wounds whether infected or colonized, whereas polihexanide is regarded as first choice for chronic wounds. In addition, an overview of active agents inappropriate for wound antisepsis is presented.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
