教育目标理论概念的结构:析因效度检验。

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1997-06-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609
Jianping Shen
{"title":"教育目标理论概念的结构:析因效度检验。","authors":"Jianping Shen","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How educational goals are conceptualized as a construct has implica tions for developing and evaluating educational programs and activities. The author used EQS 3.0 to test the factorial validity of 4 models of conceptualization of educa tional goals by conducting confirmatory factor analysis on empirical data collected from 1,134 education faculty members. The 4-factor model espoused by Goodlad fit the data best, and the participants wanted academic, vocational, personal, and social goals to be in relative harmony. Implications for educational theory, practice, and research are discussed. IN EDUCATIONAL THEORY AND PRACTICE, educational goals have been conceptualized in various ways. Some educators conceptualize educational goals as an all-inclusive, undifferentiated entity; others tend to view educational goals as the personal versus the social, or the academic versus the vocational; still others hold that the concept of educational goals includes personal, social, aca demic, and vocational elements. My purpose in the present study was to test the factorial validity of different conceptions of educational goals. The concept of educational goals has evolved in the history of educational thought. According to Walker and Soltis (1986), in The Republic the Greek philosopher Plato distinguished between the academic and vocational dimen sions of educational goals. The ancient Greeks believed that human beings had bodies that were animated and driven by a three-part soul. Each soul had an appetitive part, which expressed desires and needs and sought their fulfillment; a spirited part, which put aside unnecessary needs in the interests of self-protection and survival; and a rational part, which rose above both appetite and physical action to provide good judgment through reason. Therefore, according to Plato, educational goals were to provide academic education to people whose souls were dominated by rationality and to offer vocational education to those whose","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"342-352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structure of the Theoretical Concept of Educational Goals: A Test of Factorial Validity.\",\"authors\":\"Jianping Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How educational goals are conceptualized as a construct has implica tions for developing and evaluating educational programs and activities. The author used EQS 3.0 to test the factorial validity of 4 models of conceptualization of educa tional goals by conducting confirmatory factor analysis on empirical data collected from 1,134 education faculty members. The 4-factor model espoused by Goodlad fit the data best, and the participants wanted academic, vocational, personal, and social goals to be in relative harmony. Implications for educational theory, practice, and research are discussed. IN EDUCATIONAL THEORY AND PRACTICE, educational goals have been conceptualized in various ways. Some educators conceptualize educational goals as an all-inclusive, undifferentiated entity; others tend to view educational goals as the personal versus the social, or the academic versus the vocational; still others hold that the concept of educational goals includes personal, social, aca demic, and vocational elements. My purpose in the present study was to test the factorial validity of different conceptions of educational goals. The concept of educational goals has evolved in the history of educational thought. According to Walker and Soltis (1986), in The Republic the Greek philosopher Plato distinguished between the academic and vocational dimen sions of educational goals. The ancient Greeks believed that human beings had bodies that were animated and driven by a three-part soul. Each soul had an appetitive part, which expressed desires and needs and sought their fulfillment; a spirited part, which put aside unnecessary needs in the interests of self-protection and survival; and a rational part, which rose above both appetite and physical action to provide good judgment through reason. Therefore, according to Plato, educational goals were to provide academic education to people whose souls were dominated by rationality and to offer vocational education to those whose\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"342-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

如何将教育目标概念化为一个结构,对发展和评估教育计划和活动具有隐含意义。作者采用EQS 3.0对1134名教育教师的实证数据进行验证性因子分析,对4种教育目标概念化模型的因子效度进行检验。Goodlad支持的四因素模型最符合数据,参与者希望学术、职业、个人和社会目标相对和谐。讨论了对教育理论、实践和研究的启示。在教育理论与实践中,教育目标的概念是多种多样的。一些教育工作者将教育目标定义为一个包罗万象的、无差别的实体;其他人则倾向于将教育目标视为个人目标与社会目标,或学术目标与职业目标;还有一些人认为教育目标的概念包括个人的、社会的、学术的和职业的因素。在本研究中,我的目的是检验不同教育目标概念的析因效度。教育目标的概念是在教育思想史上发展起来的。根据Walker和Soltis(1986)的观点,希腊哲学家柏拉图在《理想国》中区分了教育目标的学术维度和职业维度。古希腊人相信人类的身体是由三部分的灵魂驱动的。每个灵魂都有一个欲望部分,表达欲望和需要,并寻求它们的满足;一个有精神的部分,为了自我保护和生存而把不必要的需要放在一边;还有一个理性的部分,它超越了欲望和身体行为,通过理性提供良好的判断。因此,柏拉图认为,教育的目标是为灵魂被理性支配的人提供学术教育,为灵魂被理性支配的人提供职业教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structure of the Theoretical Concept of Educational Goals: A Test of Factorial Validity.
How educational goals are conceptualized as a construct has implica tions for developing and evaluating educational programs and activities. The author used EQS 3.0 to test the factorial validity of 4 models of conceptualization of educa tional goals by conducting confirmatory factor analysis on empirical data collected from 1,134 education faculty members. The 4-factor model espoused by Goodlad fit the data best, and the participants wanted academic, vocational, personal, and social goals to be in relative harmony. Implications for educational theory, practice, and research are discussed. IN EDUCATIONAL THEORY AND PRACTICE, educational goals have been conceptualized in various ways. Some educators conceptualize educational goals as an all-inclusive, undifferentiated entity; others tend to view educational goals as the personal versus the social, or the academic versus the vocational; still others hold that the concept of educational goals includes personal, social, aca demic, and vocational elements. My purpose in the present study was to test the factorial validity of different conceptions of educational goals. The concept of educational goals has evolved in the history of educational thought. According to Walker and Soltis (1986), in The Republic the Greek philosopher Plato distinguished between the academic and vocational dimen sions of educational goals. The ancient Greeks believed that human beings had bodies that were animated and driven by a three-part soul. Each soul had an appetitive part, which expressed desires and needs and sought their fulfillment; a spirited part, which put aside unnecessary needs in the interests of self-protection and survival; and a rational part, which rose above both appetite and physical action to provide good judgment through reason. Therefore, according to Plato, educational goals were to provide academic education to people whose souls were dominated by rationality and to offer vocational education to those whose
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1