互惠同伴辅导对研究生成绩、考试焦虑和学业自我效能的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454
B. W. Griffin, M. Griffin
{"title":"互惠同伴辅导对研究生成绩、考试焦虑和学业自我效能的影响。","authors":"B. W. Griffin, M. Griffin","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) on graduate students' academic achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. In Experiment 1, students were assigned to one of two conditions—RPT or non-RPT. RPT students developed questions on specific course topics; they then used these questions to quiz other students before taking midterm and final course examinations. Contrary to previous research findings, the RPT and control groups did not differ significantly on lower cognitive or higher cognitive achievement measures. Students who used RPT generally reported that RPT improved their understanding of course content In Experiment 2, the RPT procedures were modifled to better match the procedures used in earlier studies whose authors had found RPT to be superior to non-RPT conditions. Also, the instruments were expanded to include course-relevant outcome measures of student academic self-efficacy and test anxiety. As in Experiment 1, the RPT an...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"197-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Graduate Students' Achievement, Test Anxiety, and Academic Self-Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"B. W. Griffin, M. Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) on graduate students' academic achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. In Experiment 1, students were assigned to one of two conditions—RPT or non-RPT. RPT students developed questions on specific course topics; they then used these questions to quiz other students before taking midterm and final course examinations. Contrary to previous research findings, the RPT and control groups did not differ significantly on lower cognitive or higher cognitive achievement measures. Students who used RPT generally reported that RPT improved their understanding of course content In Experiment 2, the RPT procedures were modifled to better match the procedures used in earlier studies whose authors had found RPT to be superior to non-RPT conditions. Also, the instruments were expanded to include course-relevant outcome measures of student academic self-efficacy and test anxiety. As in Experiment 1, the RPT an...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"197-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨对等同伴辅导(RPT)对研究生学业成绩、考试焦虑和学业自我效能的影响。在实验1中,学生被分配到两个条件中的一个——rpt或非rpt。RPT学生针对特定的课程主题提出问题;然后,在参加期中和期末考试之前,他们用这些问题来测试其他学生。与之前的研究结果相反,RPT组和对照组在低认知成就和高认知成就方面没有显著差异。使用RPT的学生普遍报告说,RPT提高了他们对课程内容的理解。在实验2中,RPT程序被修改,以更好地匹配早期研究中使用的程序,这些研究的作者发现RPT优于非RPT条件。此外,这些工具被扩展到包括与课程相关的学生学业自我效能和考试焦虑的结果测量。在实验1中,RPT和…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Graduate Students' Achievement, Test Anxiety, and Academic Self-Efficacy.
Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) on graduate students' academic achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. In Experiment 1, students were assigned to one of two conditions—RPT or non-RPT. RPT students developed questions on specific course topics; they then used these questions to quiz other students before taking midterm and final course examinations. Contrary to previous research findings, the RPT and control groups did not differ significantly on lower cognitive or higher cognitive achievement measures. Students who used RPT generally reported that RPT improved their understanding of course content In Experiment 2, the RPT procedures were modifled to better match the procedures used in earlier studies whose authors had found RPT to be superior to non-RPT conditions. Also, the instruments were expanded to include course-relevant outcome measures of student academic self-efficacy and test anxiety. As in Experiment 1, the RPT an...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1