克林格的实践性神话与研究性教学的质量——教育研究性教材内容概述

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1996-10-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787
R. Rowell
{"title":"克林格的实践性神话与研究性教学的质量——教育研究性教材内容概述","authors":"R. Rowell","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Almost 3 decades ago, Fred N. Kerlinger argued that until education dispells a few important myths about how research should be conducted, it will never be viewed as a scientific discipline. One such myth, the notion that research should have practicality as its principal aim, was vigorously attacked by Kerlinger in many of his publications. To determine whether or not Kerlinger's approach has been adopted by this generation of educational researchers, the author reviewed a selection of current educational research textbooks in terms of references to Kerlinger and adherence to the importance of basic research. Results suggest that the field of education is still focused on applied research more than on basic research.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kerlinger's Practicality Myth and the Quality of Research Instruction: An Overview of the Content of Educational Research Textbooks\",\"authors\":\"R. Rowell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Almost 3 decades ago, Fred N. Kerlinger argued that until education dispells a few important myths about how research should be conducted, it will never be viewed as a scientific discipline. One such myth, the notion that research should have practicality as its principal aim, was vigorously attacked by Kerlinger in many of his publications. To determine whether or not Kerlinger's approach has been adopted by this generation of educational researchers, the author reviewed a selection of current educational research textbooks in terms of references to Kerlinger and adherence to the importance of basic research. Results suggest that the field of education is still focused on applied research more than on basic research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"123-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近30年前,弗雷德·n·克林格(Fred N. Kerlinger)认为,除非教育消除了一些关于研究应该如何进行的重要神话,否则它永远不会被视为一门科学学科。其中一个迷思,即认为研究应该以实用性为主要目标的观念,在他的许多出版物中受到了Kerlinger的猛烈抨击。为了确定Kerlinger的方法是否被这一代教育研究者所采用,作者从引用Kerlinger和坚持基础研究重要性的角度回顾了当前教育研究教科书的选择。结果表明,教育领域仍然侧重于应用研究而不是基础研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kerlinger's Practicality Myth and the Quality of Research Instruction: An Overview of the Content of Educational Research Textbooks
Abstract Almost 3 decades ago, Fred N. Kerlinger argued that until education dispells a few important myths about how research should be conducted, it will never be viewed as a scientific discipline. One such myth, the notion that research should have practicality as its principal aim, was vigorously attacked by Kerlinger in many of his publications. To determine whether or not Kerlinger's approach has been adopted by this generation of educational researchers, the author reviewed a selection of current educational research textbooks in terms of references to Kerlinger and adherence to the importance of basic research. Results suggest that the field of education is still focused on applied research more than on basic research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1