影响学术自我效能判断普遍性的个人因素:性别、种族与相关专长

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220979909598486
M. Bong
{"title":"影响学术自我效能判断普遍性的个人因素:性别、种族与相关专长","authors":"M. Bong","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The generality of academic self-efficacy judgments of groups of students with different personal characteristics was compared, with a sample drawn from a previous study (M. Bong, 1997). Six 1st-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models of different generality were fitted separately to each group. When those models demonstrated an acceptable fit, 2nd-order CFA models were tested. The boys demonstrated more comparable strengths of self-efficacy across academic domains than the girls, who more clearly distinguished between their verbal and math self-efficacy. The Hispanic students made a clearer distinction between Spanish self-efficacy and self-efficacy in other verbal subjects than did the non-Hispanic students. Across verbal and math domains, the students who were in advanced placement classes demonstrated more conservative generality of their self-efficacy judgments than those in regular classes. It appears that students make more context-specific judgments of their academic self-efficacy ...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"67 1","pages":"315-331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598486","citationCount":"78","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Factors Affecting the Generality of Academic Self-Efficacy Judgments: Gender, Ethnicity, and Relative Expertise\",\"authors\":\"M. Bong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979909598486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The generality of academic self-efficacy judgments of groups of students with different personal characteristics was compared, with a sample drawn from a previous study (M. Bong, 1997). Six 1st-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models of different generality were fitted separately to each group. When those models demonstrated an acceptable fit, 2nd-order CFA models were tested. The boys demonstrated more comparable strengths of self-efficacy across academic domains than the girls, who more clearly distinguished between their verbal and math self-efficacy. The Hispanic students made a clearer distinction between Spanish self-efficacy and self-efficacy in other verbal subjects than did the non-Hispanic students. Across verbal and math domains, the students who were in advanced placement classes demonstrated more conservative generality of their self-efficacy judgments than those in regular classes. It appears that students make more context-specific judgments of their academic self-efficacy ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"315-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598486\",\"citationCount\":\"78\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598486\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

摘要

摘要本研究比较了不同人格特征的学生群体学业自我效能感判断的共性,选取了前人的研究样本(M. Bong, 1997)。每组分别拟合6个通用性不同的一阶验证性因子分析(CFA)模型。当这些模型显示出可接受的拟合时,对二阶CFA模型进行测试。男孩在学术领域的自我效能感比女孩更强,女孩更清楚地区分了他们的语言和数学自我效能感。西班牙裔学生比非西班牙裔学生对西班牙语自我效能感和其他语言科目的自我效能感有更清晰的区分。在语言和数学领域,上大学先修班的学生比上普通班的学生在自我效能感判断上表现得更为保守。似乎学生对他们的学业自我效能感做出了更多的情境特定判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personal Factors Affecting the Generality of Academic Self-Efficacy Judgments: Gender, Ethnicity, and Relative Expertise
Abstract The generality of academic self-efficacy judgments of groups of students with different personal characteristics was compared, with a sample drawn from a previous study (M. Bong, 1997). Six 1st-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models of different generality were fitted separately to each group. When those models demonstrated an acceptable fit, 2nd-order CFA models were tested. The boys demonstrated more comparable strengths of self-efficacy across academic domains than the girls, who more clearly distinguished between their verbal and math self-efficacy. The Hispanic students made a clearer distinction between Spanish self-efficacy and self-efficacy in other verbal subjects than did the non-Hispanic students. Across verbal and math domains, the students who were in advanced placement classes demonstrated more conservative generality of their self-efficacy judgments than those in regular classes. It appears that students make more context-specific judgments of their academic self-efficacy ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1