“不给糖就捣蛋!”——库尔特·冯内古特的《上帝保佑你,罗斯沃特先生和闹剧》中的骗子形象

IF 0.2 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE EXPLICATOR Pub Date : 2021-11-23 DOI:10.1080/00144940.2021.2005515
Ankit Raj, Nagendra Kumar
{"title":"“不给糖就捣蛋!”——库尔特·冯内古特的《上帝保佑你,罗斯沃特先生和闹剧》中的骗子形象","authors":"Ankit Raj, Nagendra Kumar","doi":"10.1080/00144940.2021.2005515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the framing chapter of Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut recounts what he learned in his Anthropology course at the University of Chicago—that people are essentially the same and that nobody is “ridiculous or bad or disgusting” (7). He further confesses that this is the reason he never writes stories with villains (7). Though largely true, his claim seems debatable if one examines two of his characters—Norman Mushari and Norman Mushari Jr.—the two being the objects of study in this article that propounds an alternate understanding of Vonnegut’s assertion. These characters have startling similarities with the archetypal trickster figure of American Indian myths as commented upon by Joseph Campbell and Carl Jung among others.","PeriodicalId":42643,"journal":{"name":"EXPLICATOR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Trick or Treat!”: The Trickster Figure in Kurt Vonnegut’s God Bless You, Mr Rosewater and Slapstick\",\"authors\":\"Ankit Raj, Nagendra Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00144940.2021.2005515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the framing chapter of Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut recounts what he learned in his Anthropology course at the University of Chicago—that people are essentially the same and that nobody is “ridiculous or bad or disgusting” (7). He further confesses that this is the reason he never writes stories with villains (7). Though largely true, his claim seems debatable if one examines two of his characters—Norman Mushari and Norman Mushari Jr.—the two being the objects of study in this article that propounds an alternate understanding of Vonnegut’s assertion. These characters have startling similarities with the archetypal trickster figure of American Indian myths as commented upon by Joseph Campbell and Carl Jung among others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXPLICATOR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXPLICATOR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXPLICATOR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2021.2005515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《五号屠宰场》的框架章节中,库尔特·冯内古特讲述了他在芝加哥大学人类学课程中学到的东西——人本质上都是一样的,没有人是“荒谬的、坏的或令人作呕的”(7)。他进一步承认,这就是他从不写恶棍故事的原因(7)。如果考察他的两个角色——诺曼·穆沙里和小诺曼·穆沙里——他的说法似乎是有争议的,这两个人是本文的研究对象,提出了对冯内古特断言的另一种理解。这些人物与约瑟夫·坎贝尔和卡尔·荣格等人所评论的美国印第安神话中的典型骗子形象有着惊人的相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Trick or Treat!”: The Trickster Figure in Kurt Vonnegut’s God Bless You, Mr Rosewater and Slapstick
In the framing chapter of Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut recounts what he learned in his Anthropology course at the University of Chicago—that people are essentially the same and that nobody is “ridiculous or bad or disgusting” (7). He further confesses that this is the reason he never writes stories with villains (7). Though largely true, his claim seems debatable if one examines two of his characters—Norman Mushari and Norman Mushari Jr.—the two being the objects of study in this article that propounds an alternate understanding of Vonnegut’s assertion. These characters have startling similarities with the archetypal trickster figure of American Indian myths as commented upon by Joseph Campbell and Carl Jung among others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXPLICATOR
EXPLICATOR LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Concentrating on works that are frequently anthologized and studied in college classrooms, The Explicator, with its yearly index of titles, is a must for college and university libraries and teachers of literature. Text-based criticism thrives in The Explicator. One of few in its class, the journal publishes concise notes on passages of prose and poetry. Each issue contains between 25 and 30 notes on works of literature, ranging from ancient Greek and Roman times to our own, from throughout the world. Students rely on The Explicator for insight into works they are studying.
期刊最新文献
Thoreau’s philosophy of work in frost’s “mowing” “The Work Wisdom of ‘From Plane to Plane’” The Underthought of John Milton’s Samson Agonistes in Gerard Manley Hopkins’s “My own heart let me more have pity on.” “Hallow’d Mold”: Collins’s “Ode, Written in the Beginning of the Year 1746” (“How Sleep the Brave”) Consent, rape and pollution: the context of Hrosvitha’s Dulcitius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1