康提山反否定建构:藏缅影响?

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING
Douglas Inglis
{"title":"康提山反否定建构:藏缅影响?","authors":"Douglas Inglis","doi":"10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely recognized that Khamti Shan is unique among Tai languages in evidencing a basic (A)OV word order, quite likely due to extensive language contact with Tibeto-Burman languages. Much less recognized in Khamti Shan is that some functional objects take a postposition marker, revealing a striking, but not necessarily unexpected, resemblance to a Tibeto-Burman-like anti-ergative construction. The deictic mai² ‘here’ grammaticalizes an anti-ergative function in which it acts as a marker for certain monotransitive ‘objects’ which are analyzed as pragmatically foregrounded referents in the information structure of the sentence.","PeriodicalId":41542,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","volume":"1 1","pages":"133-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction: A Tibeto-Burman influence?\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Inglis\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely recognized that Khamti Shan is unique among Tai languages in evidencing a basic (A)OV word order, quite likely due to extensive language contact with Tibeto-Burman languages. Much less recognized in Khamti Shan is that some functional objects take a postposition marker, revealing a striking, but not necessarily unexpected, resemblance to a Tibeto-Burman-like anti-ergative construction. The deictic mai² ‘here’ grammaticalizes an anti-ergative function in which it acts as a marker for certain monotransitive ‘objects’ which are analyzed as pragmatically foregrounded referents in the information structure of the sentence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"133-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LTBA.17001.ING","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们普遍认为,Khamti Shan在泰语中是独一无二的,它证明了一个基本的(a)OV语序,很可能是由于与藏缅语的广泛语言接触。在Khamti Shan中很少被认识到的是,一些功能性物体采用后置标记,显示出一种惊人的,但不一定出乎意料的,类似于藏缅语的反否定结构。指示语“here”语法化了一种反否定功能,在这种功能中,它充当了某些单及物“对象”的标记,这些“对象”在句子的信息结构中被分析为语用前景所指。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction: A Tibeto-Burman influence?
It is widely recognized that Khamti Shan is unique among Tai languages in evidencing a basic (A)OV word order, quite likely due to extensive language contact with Tibeto-Burman languages. Much less recognized in Khamti Shan is that some functional objects take a postposition marker, revealing a striking, but not necessarily unexpected, resemblance to a Tibeto-Burman-like anti-ergative construction. The deictic mai² ‘here’ grammaticalizes an anti-ergative function in which it acts as a marker for certain monotransitive ‘objects’ which are analyzed as pragmatically foregrounded referents in the information structure of the sentence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The Wancho language of Kamhua Noknu village Kinship terms in Stau Verb stem alternations in Pingwu Baima Emergence of the honorific register in Tibetic languages Revisiting “Eye of the day”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1