{"title":"昌都新认可的语言","authors":"T. Nyima, Hiroyuki Suzuki","doi":"10.1075/LTBA.18004.NYI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents information regarding newly recognised\n non-Tibetic Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in three counties, Dzogang, Markham,\n and Drag-yab, of Chamdo Municipality and the adjacent Dzayul County in the Tibet\n Autonomous Region. First, we introduce four languages – Lamo, Larong sMar,\n Drag-yab sMar, and gSerkhu – identifying the location of each language on the\n Chinese administrative map as well as the numbers of speakers of the languages.\n Second, we provide a brief historical background on these languages, which\n suggests a relationship between them and Qiangic groups. Third, we display\n lexical evidence that shows not only their non-Tibetic features but also their\n closeness to Qiangic languages. Finally, the article focuses on Lamo, an endangered language spoken in\n Dzogang County, and provides a linguistic analysis of an annotated Lamo\n historical narrative in the Appendix.","PeriodicalId":41542,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newly recognised languages in Chamdo\",\"authors\":\"T. Nyima, Hiroyuki Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LTBA.18004.NYI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article presents information regarding newly recognised\\n non-Tibetic Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in three counties, Dzogang, Markham,\\n and Drag-yab, of Chamdo Municipality and the adjacent Dzayul County in the Tibet\\n Autonomous Region. First, we introduce four languages – Lamo, Larong sMar,\\n Drag-yab sMar, and gSerkhu – identifying the location of each language on the\\n Chinese administrative map as well as the numbers of speakers of the languages.\\n Second, we provide a brief historical background on these languages, which\\n suggests a relationship between them and Qiangic groups. Third, we display\\n lexical evidence that shows not only their non-Tibetic features but also their\\n closeness to Qiangic languages. Finally, the article focuses on Lamo, an endangered language spoken in\\n Dzogang County, and provides a linguistic analysis of an annotated Lamo\\n historical narrative in the Appendix.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LTBA.18004.NYI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LTBA.18004.NYI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article presents information regarding newly recognised
non-Tibetic Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in three counties, Dzogang, Markham,
and Drag-yab, of Chamdo Municipality and the adjacent Dzayul County in the Tibet
Autonomous Region. First, we introduce four languages – Lamo, Larong sMar,
Drag-yab sMar, and gSerkhu – identifying the location of each language on the
Chinese administrative map as well as the numbers of speakers of the languages.
Second, we provide a brief historical background on these languages, which
suggests a relationship between them and Qiangic groups. Third, we display
lexical evidence that shows not only their non-Tibetic features but also their
closeness to Qiangic languages. Finally, the article focuses on Lamo, an endangered language spoken in
Dzogang County, and provides a linguistic analysis of an annotated Lamo
historical narrative in the Appendix.