发音输出缓冲区对备选图片名称了解多少?反对反应排斥假说的证据

A. Hantsch, A. Mädebach
{"title":"发音输出缓冲区对备选图片名称了解多少?反对反应排斥假说的证据","authors":"A. Hantsch, A. Mädebach","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.595725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When participants name pictures in the presence of a distractor word, a semantic relation between distractor word and picture name interferes with the naming response. Some models take this to reflect a lexical-competition process, while other models assume it to result from a postlexical response-exclusion mechanism. According to the latter view, the distractor word has privileged access to an articulatory output buffer and has to be purged from it before the picture name can be produced. This buffer is assumed to have access to information that is relevant within a given task such as gross semantic category information. Any (semantic) similarity between the picture name and the distractor word then should render removal of the distractor more difficult and thus prolong naming latencies. However, more fine-grained semantic information is not accessible to the articulatory output buffer and, thus, should not affect naming performance. We tested this assumption by comparing the effect of two semantic distractor conditions keeping the semantic relation between distractor words and the to-be-produced (basic-level) picture names constant, while manipulating only the relation between the distractor and the pictures' subordinate-level name. Contrary to the predictions of the response-exclusion hypothesis, this manipulation determined whether or not semantic interference was obtained.","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2011.595725","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does the articulatory output buffer know about alternative picture names? Evidence against the response-exclusion hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"A. Hantsch, A. Mädebach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01690965.2011.595725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When participants name pictures in the presence of a distractor word, a semantic relation between distractor word and picture name interferes with the naming response. Some models take this to reflect a lexical-competition process, while other models assume it to result from a postlexical response-exclusion mechanism. According to the latter view, the distractor word has privileged access to an articulatory output buffer and has to be purged from it before the picture name can be produced. This buffer is assumed to have access to information that is relevant within a given task such as gross semantic category information. Any (semantic) similarity between the picture name and the distractor word then should render removal of the distractor more difficult and thus prolong naming latencies. However, more fine-grained semantic information is not accessible to the articulatory output buffer and, thus, should not affect naming performance. We tested this assumption by comparing the effect of two semantic distractor conditions keeping the semantic relation between distractor words and the to-be-produced (basic-level) picture names constant, while manipulating only the relation between the distractor and the pictures' subordinate-level name. Contrary to the predictions of the response-exclusion hypothesis, this manipulation determined whether or not semantic interference was obtained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and cognitive processes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2011.595725\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and cognitive processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.595725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and cognitive processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.595725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

当被试在有干扰词的情况下命名图片时,干扰词和图片名称之间的语义关系干扰了命名反应。一些模型认为这反映了词汇竞争过程,而其他模型则认为这是词汇后反应排斥机制的结果。根据后一种观点,干扰词对发音输出缓冲器有特权访问,必须在产生图片名称之前从缓冲器中清除。假定该缓冲区可以访问给定任务中相关的信息,例如总体语义类别信息。图片名称和干扰词之间的任何(语义)相似性都应该使移除干扰词变得更加困难,从而延长命名延迟。但是,发音输出缓冲区无法访问更细粒度的语义信息,因此不应影响命名性能。我们通过比较两种语义干扰条件的效果来验证这一假设,即保持干扰词与待生成(基本级)图片名称之间的语义关系不变,而只操纵干扰词与图片的从属级名称之间的关系。与反应排斥假说的预测相反,这种操作决定了是否获得语义干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What does the articulatory output buffer know about alternative picture names? Evidence against the response-exclusion hypothesis
When participants name pictures in the presence of a distractor word, a semantic relation between distractor word and picture name interferes with the naming response. Some models take this to reflect a lexical-competition process, while other models assume it to result from a postlexical response-exclusion mechanism. According to the latter view, the distractor word has privileged access to an articulatory output buffer and has to be purged from it before the picture name can be produced. This buffer is assumed to have access to information that is relevant within a given task such as gross semantic category information. Any (semantic) similarity between the picture name and the distractor word then should render removal of the distractor more difficult and thus prolong naming latencies. However, more fine-grained semantic information is not accessible to the articulatory output buffer and, thus, should not affect naming performance. We tested this assumption by comparing the effect of two semantic distractor conditions keeping the semantic relation between distractor words and the to-be-produced (basic-level) picture names constant, while manipulating only the relation between the distractor and the pictures' subordinate-level name. Contrary to the predictions of the response-exclusion hypothesis, this manipulation determined whether or not semantic interference was obtained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns. MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference. Phonemes and Production. Memory availability and referential access. The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1