不平衡?-不平等薪酬制度对爱尔兰社会动机的影响

Karen Hand, M. Maclachlan
{"title":"不平衡?-不平等薪酬制度对爱尔兰社会动机的影响","authors":"Karen Hand, M. Maclachlan","doi":"10.1080/03033910.2012.708902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hypothesis that unequal pay systems create demotivating effects at a societal level was experimentally tested within a general population sample (N=187). Four pay systems, representing unequal pay for equal effort and results, were presented, and anticipated changes in motivation level on three items (productivity, pride and participation) versus baseline were measured. The four unequal systems were (1) Arbitrary (A versus B), (2) Senior versus Junior, (3) Private Sector Higher versus Public Sector Lower and (4) Public Sector Higher versus Private Sector Lower. All four unequal pay systems had significant demotivation effects versus the baseline motivation measures. The demotivation effects were also significantly ‘crowded out’ when presented within systems, which reinforced dominant legitimising myths (e.g., Seniority and Private Enterprise). Further research is needed to estimate the full economic and social capital costs of inequality and to investigate the psychological costs and benefits of ‘moti...","PeriodicalId":91174,"journal":{"name":"The Irish journal of psychology","volume":"33 1","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03033910.2012.708902","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An unequal balance? – The effects of unequal pay systems on societal motivation in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Karen Hand, M. Maclachlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03033910.2012.708902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hypothesis that unequal pay systems create demotivating effects at a societal level was experimentally tested within a general population sample (N=187). Four pay systems, representing unequal pay for equal effort and results, were presented, and anticipated changes in motivation level on three items (productivity, pride and participation) versus baseline were measured. The four unequal systems were (1) Arbitrary (A versus B), (2) Senior versus Junior, (3) Private Sector Higher versus Public Sector Lower and (4) Public Sector Higher versus Private Sector Lower. All four unequal pay systems had significant demotivation effects versus the baseline motivation measures. The demotivation effects were also significantly ‘crowded out’ when presented within systems, which reinforced dominant legitimising myths (e.g., Seniority and Private Enterprise). Further research is needed to estimate the full economic and social capital costs of inequality and to investigate the psychological costs and benefits of ‘moti...\",\"PeriodicalId\":91174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Irish journal of psychology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"129-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03033910.2012.708902\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Irish journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.708902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Irish journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.708902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

不平等薪酬制度在社会层面上产生消极影响的假设在一般人群样本中进行了实验测试(N=187)。提出了四种薪酬制度,代表了同等努力和成果的不平等薪酬,并测量了三个项目(生产力、自豪感和参与)的动机水平与基线的预期变化。这四种不平等的制度是:(1)武断的(A对B),(2)高级对初级,(3)私营部门高对公共部门低,(4)公共部门高对私营部门低。与基本的激励措施相比,所有四种不平等的薪酬制度都有显著的消极影响。当在系统内出现时,这种消极影响也会被明显地“排挤”出去,这强化了主导的合法化神话(例如,资历和私营企业)。需要进一步的研究来估计不平等的全部经济和社会资本成本,并调查“动机”的心理成本和收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An unequal balance? – The effects of unequal pay systems on societal motivation in Ireland
The hypothesis that unequal pay systems create demotivating effects at a societal level was experimentally tested within a general population sample (N=187). Four pay systems, representing unequal pay for equal effort and results, were presented, and anticipated changes in motivation level on three items (productivity, pride and participation) versus baseline were measured. The four unequal systems were (1) Arbitrary (A versus B), (2) Senior versus Junior, (3) Private Sector Higher versus Public Sector Lower and (4) Public Sector Higher versus Private Sector Lower. All four unequal pay systems had significant demotivation effects versus the baseline motivation measures. The demotivation effects were also significantly ‘crowded out’ when presented within systems, which reinforced dominant legitimising myths (e.g., Seniority and Private Enterprise). Further research is needed to estimate the full economic and social capital costs of inequality and to investigate the psychological costs and benefits of ‘moti...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective Evaluation of Hearing Status in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. Service users’ experiences of life supported by an Irish mental health service still battling with implementing recovery-orientated principles Teenage parenthood and child externalising and internalising problems: evidence from the ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ study Predictive role of risk and protective factors before and after suicide intervention therapy Elite athlete receptivity to sport psychology consulting in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1