《不结婚:追求死亡:最高法院与死刑》

Q2 Social Sciences Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2018-05-04 DOI:10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652
Sheri L. Johnson
{"title":"《不结婚:追求死亡:最高法院与死刑》","authors":"Sheri L. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment by Carol and Jordan Steiker is, as the introduction states, “the story of how the American death penalty has come full circle over the past fifty years.” There have been quite a few books written about the American death penalty, so when I agreed to evaluate the submitted manuscript of Courting Death for a potential publisher, I doubted that another history would be especially enlightening. But Courting Death won me over. After my first read, it became my number one recommendation for the legal generalist—or lay reader—who wants a sophisticated understanding of the past, present, and future of the American death penalty. After the second read, undertaken for this review, I realized that it has almost as much to offer for the scholar who specializes in capital punishment law. It was this second read that prompted me to think more about the consequences of the Supreme Court’s failure (refusal? inability?) to sustain a focus on any of the problems that bedevil the administration of the death penalty; to employ the courtship metaphor embodied in the title of the Steikers’ book, the Supreme Court may be good for a couple of fun dates, but it’s not headed for the altar anytime soon.","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not the Marrying Kind: A Review of Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment\",\"authors\":\"Sheri L. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment by Carol and Jordan Steiker is, as the introduction states, “the story of how the American death penalty has come full circle over the past fifty years.” There have been quite a few books written about the American death penalty, so when I agreed to evaluate the submitted manuscript of Courting Death for a potential publisher, I doubted that another history would be especially enlightening. But Courting Death won me over. After my first read, it became my number one recommendation for the legal generalist—or lay reader—who wants a sophisticated understanding of the past, present, and future of the American death penalty. After the second read, undertaken for this review, I realized that it has almost as much to offer for the scholar who specializes in capital punishment law. It was this second read that prompted me to think more about the consequences of the Supreme Court’s failure (refusal? inability?) to sustain a focus on any of the problems that bedevil the administration of the death penalty; to employ the courtship metaphor embodied in the title of the Steikers’ book, the Supreme Court may be good for a couple of fun dates, but it’s not headed for the altar anytime soon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2018.1510652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Carol和Jordan Steiker合著的《追求死亡:最高法院和死刑》,正如前言所述,“讲述了美国死刑在过去50年里是如何兜了一个圈的”。关于美国死刑的书已经有相当多了,所以当我同意为一个潜在的出版商评估《追求死亡》的手稿时,我怀疑另一段历史是否会特别有启发意义。但是《求爱死亡》打动了我。在我第一次阅读之后,这本书成为我对法律通才——或者说是外行读者——的首选推荐,他们想要对美国死刑的过去、现在和未来有一个深入的了解。在为这篇评论而进行的第二次阅读之后,我意识到它几乎可以为专门研究死刑法的学者提供很多东西。正是这第二次阅读促使我更多地思考最高法院失败的后果(拒绝?无力?)继续关注困扰死刑管理的任何问题;借用Steikers这本书的标题中的求爱比喻,最高法院可能适合一些有趣的约会,但它不会很快走向圣坛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not the Marrying Kind: A Review of Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment
Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment by Carol and Jordan Steiker is, as the introduction states, “the story of how the American death penalty has come full circle over the past fifty years.” There have been quite a few books written about the American death penalty, so when I agreed to evaluate the submitted manuscript of Courting Death for a potential publisher, I doubted that another history would be especially enlightening. But Courting Death won me over. After my first read, it became my number one recommendation for the legal generalist—or lay reader—who wants a sophisticated understanding of the past, present, and future of the American death penalty. After the second read, undertaken for this review, I realized that it has almost as much to offer for the scholar who specializes in capital punishment law. It was this second read that prompted me to think more about the consequences of the Supreme Court’s failure (refusal? inability?) to sustain a focus on any of the problems that bedevil the administration of the death penalty; to employ the courtship metaphor embodied in the title of the Steikers’ book, the Supreme Court may be good for a couple of fun dates, but it’s not headed for the altar anytime soon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Criminal Justice Ethics
Criminal Justice Ethics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Exposing, Reversing, and Inheriting Crimes as Traumas from the Neurosciences to Epigenetics: Why Criminal Law Cannot Yet Afford A(nother) Biology-induced Overhaul Institutional Corruption, Institutional Corrosion and Collective Responsibility Sentencing, Artificial Intelligence, and Condemnation: A Reply to Taylor Double Jeopardy, Autrefois Acquit and the Legal Ethics of the Rule Against Unreasonably Splitting a Case Ethical Resource Allocation in Policing: Why Policing Requires a Different Approach from Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1