支持和反对欧洲蜜蜂和澳大利亚本土蜜蜂之间竞争的证据

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pacific Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1071/pc21064
K. Prendergast, Kinglsey W. Dixon, P. Bateman
{"title":"支持和反对欧洲蜜蜂和澳大利亚本土蜜蜂之间竞争的证据","authors":"K. Prendergast, Kinglsey W. Dixon, P. Bateman","doi":"10.1071/pc21064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Australia, the European honeybee (Apis mellifera) is an exotic, abundant, super-generalist species. Introduced two centuries ago, it thrives in the absence of many diseases adversely impacting honeybees elsewhere. Australia’s native bees may be vulnerable to competition with honeybees, leading to reduced abundances, reproductive output or even loss of bee species. We review the literature concerning competition between honeybees and Australian native bees in order to: (1) identify the valuence and strength of honeybee associations with native bees, and how this varies according to the response variable measured; (2) assess potential research biases; (3) use ecological theory to explain variation in results; and (4) identify key knowledge gaps. We found honeybees typically comprised the majority of individuals in surveys of Australian bee communities. Data on whether honeybees outcompete native bees is equivocal: there were no associations with native bee abundance, species richness, or reproductive output in most cases. However, there were more negative than positive associations. Data indicate effects of honeybees are species-specific, and more detailed investigations regarding how different species and life-history traits affect interactions with honeybees is needed. We propose the following investigations to address deficiencies in the current literature: greater geographic and landscape representation; trait-based investigations; quantifying resource availability and overlap; disease and predator interactions; experimental feral colony removals; and studies spanning multiple seasons and years. Identifying conditions under which honeybees have negative, neutral or positive effects on native bees, and how the ecological traits of native bees are affected by honeybee competition can guide conservation and management.","PeriodicalId":38939,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Conservation Biology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evidence for and against competition between the European honeybee and Australian native bees\",\"authors\":\"K. Prendergast, Kinglsey W. Dixon, P. Bateman\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/pc21064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Australia, the European honeybee (Apis mellifera) is an exotic, abundant, super-generalist species. Introduced two centuries ago, it thrives in the absence of many diseases adversely impacting honeybees elsewhere. Australia’s native bees may be vulnerable to competition with honeybees, leading to reduced abundances, reproductive output or even loss of bee species. We review the literature concerning competition between honeybees and Australian native bees in order to: (1) identify the valuence and strength of honeybee associations with native bees, and how this varies according to the response variable measured; (2) assess potential research biases; (3) use ecological theory to explain variation in results; and (4) identify key knowledge gaps. We found honeybees typically comprised the majority of individuals in surveys of Australian bee communities. Data on whether honeybees outcompete native bees is equivocal: there were no associations with native bee abundance, species richness, or reproductive output in most cases. However, there were more negative than positive associations. Data indicate effects of honeybees are species-specific, and more detailed investigations regarding how different species and life-history traits affect interactions with honeybees is needed. We propose the following investigations to address deficiencies in the current literature: greater geographic and landscape representation; trait-based investigations; quantifying resource availability and overlap; disease and predator interactions; experimental feral colony removals; and studies spanning multiple seasons and years. Identifying conditions under which honeybees have negative, neutral or positive effects on native bees, and how the ecological traits of native bees are affected by honeybee competition can guide conservation and management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/pc21064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/pc21064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在澳大利亚,欧洲蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)是一种外来的、丰富的、超级通用的物种。两个世纪前引入,它在没有许多疾病对其他地方的蜜蜂产生不利影响的情况下茁壮成长。澳大利亚的本土蜜蜂可能很容易受到蜜蜂的竞争,导致丰度降低,繁殖量减少,甚至蜜蜂物种的消失。我们回顾了有关蜜蜂与澳大利亚本地蜜蜂之间竞争的文献,以便:(1)确定蜜蜂与本地蜜蜂的关联的价值和强度,以及这种关联如何根据测量的响应变量而变化;(2)评估潜在的研究偏差;(3)运用生态学理论解释结果的变异;(4)识别关键知识缺口。我们发现,在澳大利亚蜜蜂群落的调查中,蜜蜂通常占大多数。关于蜜蜂是否比本地蜜蜂更有竞争力的数据是模棱两可的:在大多数情况下,与本地蜜蜂的丰度、物种丰富度或繁殖量没有关联。然而,负面关联多于正面关联。数据表明,蜜蜂的影响是物种特异性的,需要对不同物种和生活史特征如何影响与蜜蜂的相互作用进行更详细的研究。我们建议进行以下调查以解决当前文献中的不足:增加地理和景观代表性;叫调查;量化资源的可用性和重叠;疾病与捕食者的相互作用;实验性野生菌落清除;研究跨越了多个季节和年份。确定蜜蜂对本地蜜蜂产生消极、中性或积极影响的条件,以及蜜蜂竞争对本地蜜蜂生态性状的影响,可以指导保护和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evidence for and against competition between the European honeybee and Australian native bees
In Australia, the European honeybee (Apis mellifera) is an exotic, abundant, super-generalist species. Introduced two centuries ago, it thrives in the absence of many diseases adversely impacting honeybees elsewhere. Australia’s native bees may be vulnerable to competition with honeybees, leading to reduced abundances, reproductive output or even loss of bee species. We review the literature concerning competition between honeybees and Australian native bees in order to: (1) identify the valuence and strength of honeybee associations with native bees, and how this varies according to the response variable measured; (2) assess potential research biases; (3) use ecological theory to explain variation in results; and (4) identify key knowledge gaps. We found honeybees typically comprised the majority of individuals in surveys of Australian bee communities. Data on whether honeybees outcompete native bees is equivocal: there were no associations with native bee abundance, species richness, or reproductive output in most cases. However, there were more negative than positive associations. Data indicate effects of honeybees are species-specific, and more detailed investigations regarding how different species and life-history traits affect interactions with honeybees is needed. We propose the following investigations to address deficiencies in the current literature: greater geographic and landscape representation; trait-based investigations; quantifying resource availability and overlap; disease and predator interactions; experimental feral colony removals; and studies spanning multiple seasons and years. Identifying conditions under which honeybees have negative, neutral or positive effects on native bees, and how the ecological traits of native bees are affected by honeybee competition can guide conservation and management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Conservation Biology
Pacific Conservation Biology Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Pacific Conservation Biology provides an important discussion forum for regional conservation issues, debate about management priorities, and dissemination of research results. The journal publishes original research, reviews, perspectives and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Ivor Beatty Award 2022 Special issues in Pacific Conservation Biology – an update <i>Corrigendum to</i>: The role of grass-tree <i>Xanthorrhoea semiplana</i> (Asphodelaceae) canopies in temperature regulation and waterproofing for ground-dwelling wildlife <i>Corrigendum to</i>: Community-driven shark monitoring for informed decision making: a case study from Fiji Retraction notice to ‘Key research priorities for the future of fish and fisheries in Australia’ [Pacific Conservation Biology (2022) doi:10.1071/PC21073]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1