I. Wiklund, O. Junghard, E. Grace, N. Talley, M. Kamm, S. Veldhuyzenvanzanten, P. Paré, N. Chiba, Leddin Ds, M. Bigard, R. Colin, P. Schoenfeld
{"title":"反流和消化不良患者的生活质量。一种新的疾病特异性问卷(QOLRAD)的心理测量记录。","authors":"I. Wiklund, O. Junghard, E. Grace, N. Talley, M. Kamm, S. Veldhuyzenvanzanten, P. Paré, N. Chiba, Leddin Ds, M. Bigard, R. Colin, P. Schoenfeld","doi":"10.1080/11024159850191238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To develop a disease-specific QOL instrument (QOLRAD) addressing patient concerns in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia. Patients. 759 male (45%) and female (55%) patients with a mean age of 48.4 years (sd 15.2) were used in the psychometric evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A pilot version of QOLRAD, the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) and the SF-36 were completed prior to endoscopy. Items with a high ceiling effect, items measuring a different construct, i.e. with a low squared multiple correlation (R < 0.5) with the other items, items that showed redundancy by a high correlation (>0.80) with another item were removed. A confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. RESULTS The final questionnaire included 25 items depicting problems with emotions, vitality, sleep, eating/drinking, and physical/social functioning. The internal consistency reliability was high (alpha value overall 0.97, dimensions 0.89-94). Construct validity, i.e. the associations between similar constructs in the QOLRAD, the SF-36 and the GSRS scores was confirmed. Pain and symptom severity were markers of impaired QOL. The impact on health-related QOL was similar across the functional gastrointestinal disorders with the exception of patients with a normal endoscopy, who did slightly worse. CONCLUSION The QOLRAD is a short and user-friendly instrument with excellent psychometric properties. Its responsiveness to change in (AVMC1) clinical trials is currently being explored.","PeriodicalId":77418,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","volume":"583 1","pages":"41-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"294","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD).\",\"authors\":\"I. Wiklund, O. Junghard, E. Grace, N. Talley, M. Kamm, S. Veldhuyzenvanzanten, P. Paré, N. Chiba, Leddin Ds, M. Bigard, R. Colin, P. Schoenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11024159850191238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE To develop a disease-specific QOL instrument (QOLRAD) addressing patient concerns in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia. Patients. 759 male (45%) and female (55%) patients with a mean age of 48.4 years (sd 15.2) were used in the psychometric evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A pilot version of QOLRAD, the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) and the SF-36 were completed prior to endoscopy. Items with a high ceiling effect, items measuring a different construct, i.e. with a low squared multiple correlation (R < 0.5) with the other items, items that showed redundancy by a high correlation (>0.80) with another item were removed. A confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. RESULTS The final questionnaire included 25 items depicting problems with emotions, vitality, sleep, eating/drinking, and physical/social functioning. The internal consistency reliability was high (alpha value overall 0.97, dimensions 0.89-94). Construct validity, i.e. the associations between similar constructs in the QOLRAD, the SF-36 and the GSRS scores was confirmed. Pain and symptom severity were markers of impaired QOL. The impact on health-related QOL was similar across the functional gastrointestinal disorders with the exception of patients with a normal endoscopy, who did slightly worse. CONCLUSION The QOLRAD is a short and user-friendly instrument with excellent psychometric properties. Its responsiveness to change in (AVMC1) clinical trials is currently being explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"583 1\",\"pages\":\"41-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"294\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11024159850191238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11024159850191238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD).
OBJECTIVE To develop a disease-specific QOL instrument (QOLRAD) addressing patient concerns in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia. Patients. 759 male (45%) and female (55%) patients with a mean age of 48.4 years (sd 15.2) were used in the psychometric evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A pilot version of QOLRAD, the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) and the SF-36 were completed prior to endoscopy. Items with a high ceiling effect, items measuring a different construct, i.e. with a low squared multiple correlation (R < 0.5) with the other items, items that showed redundancy by a high correlation (>0.80) with another item were removed. A confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. RESULTS The final questionnaire included 25 items depicting problems with emotions, vitality, sleep, eating/drinking, and physical/social functioning. The internal consistency reliability was high (alpha value overall 0.97, dimensions 0.89-94). Construct validity, i.e. the associations between similar constructs in the QOLRAD, the SF-36 and the GSRS scores was confirmed. Pain and symptom severity were markers of impaired QOL. The impact on health-related QOL was similar across the functional gastrointestinal disorders with the exception of patients with a normal endoscopy, who did slightly worse. CONCLUSION The QOLRAD is a short and user-friendly instrument with excellent psychometric properties. Its responsiveness to change in (AVMC1) clinical trials is currently being explored.