备用司机调度

D. Gupta, Fei Li
{"title":"备用司机调度","authors":"D. Gupta, Fei Li","doi":"10.1080/0740817X.2015.1078016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Transit agencies use reserve drivers to cover open work that arises from planned and unplanned time off, equipment breakdowns, weather, and special events. Work assignment decisions must be made sequentially without information about future job requests, a driver’s earlier assignment may not be interrupted to accommodate a new job (no pre-emption), and the scheduler may need to select a particular driver when multiple drivers can perform a job. Motivated by this instance of the interval scheduling problem, we propose a randomized algorithm that carries a performance guarantee relative to the best offline solution and simultaneously performs better than any deterministic algorithm. A key objective of this article is to develop an algorithm that performs well in both average and worst-case scenarios. For this reason, our approach includes discretionary parameters that allow the user to achieve a balance between a myopic approach (accept all jobs that can be scheduled) and a strategic approach (consider accepting only if jobs are longer than a certain threshold). We test our algorithm on data from a large transit agency and show that it performs well relative to the commonly used myopic approach. Although this article is motivated by a transit industry application, the approach we develop is applicable in a whole host of applications involving on-demand-processing of jobs. Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher’s online edition of IIE Transactions for datasets, additional tables, detailed proofs, etc.","PeriodicalId":13379,"journal":{"name":"IIE Transactions","volume":"48 1","pages":"193 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1078016","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reserve driver scheduling\",\"authors\":\"D. Gupta, Fei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0740817X.2015.1078016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Transit agencies use reserve drivers to cover open work that arises from planned and unplanned time off, equipment breakdowns, weather, and special events. Work assignment decisions must be made sequentially without information about future job requests, a driver’s earlier assignment may not be interrupted to accommodate a new job (no pre-emption), and the scheduler may need to select a particular driver when multiple drivers can perform a job. Motivated by this instance of the interval scheduling problem, we propose a randomized algorithm that carries a performance guarantee relative to the best offline solution and simultaneously performs better than any deterministic algorithm. A key objective of this article is to develop an algorithm that performs well in both average and worst-case scenarios. For this reason, our approach includes discretionary parameters that allow the user to achieve a balance between a myopic approach (accept all jobs that can be scheduled) and a strategic approach (consider accepting only if jobs are longer than a certain threshold). We test our algorithm on data from a large transit agency and show that it performs well relative to the commonly used myopic approach. Although this article is motivated by a transit industry application, the approach we develop is applicable in a whole host of applications involving on-demand-processing of jobs. Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher’s online edition of IIE Transactions for datasets, additional tables, detailed proofs, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIE Transactions\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1078016\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIE Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1078016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1078016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

交通运输机构使用备用司机来处理由于计划内和计划外的休假、设备故障、天气和特殊事件而产生的开放式工作。工作分配决策必须在没有关于未来作业请求的信息的情况下顺序地做出,一个驱动程序先前的分配不能被中断以适应一个新作业(没有抢占),当多个驱动程序可以执行一个作业时,调度程序可能需要选择一个特定的驱动程序。在此区间调度问题实例的激励下,我们提出了一种随机算法,该算法相对于最佳离线解决方案具有性能保证,同时性能优于任何确定性算法。本文的一个关键目标是开发一种在平均和最坏情况下都表现良好的算法。出于这个原因,我们的方法包括可自由支配的参数,这些参数允许用户在短视方法(接受所有可以调度的作业)和策略方法(考虑仅接受作业超过某个阈值)之间实现平衡。我们在一家大型运输机构的数据上测试了我们的算法,结果表明,相对于常用的近视眼方法,它表现得很好。尽管本文的灵感来自于一个交通行业应用程序,但我们开发的方法适用于大量涉及按需处理工作的应用程序。本文有补充材料。请访问出版商的在线版IIE Transactions获取数据集、附加表、详细证明等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reserve driver scheduling
ABSTRACT Transit agencies use reserve drivers to cover open work that arises from planned and unplanned time off, equipment breakdowns, weather, and special events. Work assignment decisions must be made sequentially without information about future job requests, a driver’s earlier assignment may not be interrupted to accommodate a new job (no pre-emption), and the scheduler may need to select a particular driver when multiple drivers can perform a job. Motivated by this instance of the interval scheduling problem, we propose a randomized algorithm that carries a performance guarantee relative to the best offline solution and simultaneously performs better than any deterministic algorithm. A key objective of this article is to develop an algorithm that performs well in both average and worst-case scenarios. For this reason, our approach includes discretionary parameters that allow the user to achieve a balance between a myopic approach (accept all jobs that can be scheduled) and a strategic approach (consider accepting only if jobs are longer than a certain threshold). We test our algorithm on data from a large transit agency and show that it performs well relative to the commonly used myopic approach. Although this article is motivated by a transit industry application, the approach we develop is applicable in a whole host of applications involving on-demand-processing of jobs. Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher’s online edition of IIE Transactions for datasets, additional tables, detailed proofs, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IIE Transactions
IIE Transactions 工程技术-工程:工业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊最新文献
EOV Focus Area Editorial Boards Strategic health workforce planning Efficient computation of the likelihood expansions for diffusion models An introduction to optimal power flow: Theory, formulation, and examples An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1