{"title":"在化疗的基础上增加免疫治疗可提高子宫内膜癌患者的生存率","authors":"Mike Fillon","doi":"10.3322/caac.21809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is encouraging news for patients with endometrial cancer based on the results of two recent phase 3 clinical trials: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may appreciably increase progression-free survival for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.</p><p>Both trials—NRG-GY018 and RUBY— were presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer in Tampa, Florida. Both also appear in <i>The New England Journal of Medicine.</i>\n </p><p>The NRG-GY018 trial (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302312) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Enrolled were 816 volunteers with stage III/IVA, stage IVB, or recurrent endometrial cancer who were randomized 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab—an immune checkpoint inhibitor—plus chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin or a placebo plus chemotherapy for six cycles. They then received as many as 14 cycles of maintenance pembrolizumab or placebo.</p><p>All had newly diagnosed stage III or IVA disease with Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors– measurable disease or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer with or without measurable disease.</p><p>The volunteers were divided into two cohorts: those who had mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) disease and those who had mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) disease. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in both cohorts. Interim analyses were scheduled after 84 events of death or progression in the cohort with dMMR disease and at least 196 events in the cohort with pMMR disease.</p><p>The double-blind, placebo-controlled RUBY trial (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2216334) enrolled 494 patients with first recurrent or primary advanced stage III or IV endometrial cancer. Measurable disease was required for stages IIIA–C1, and 49 patients with carcinosarcoma—a rare and difficult-to-treat subset of endometrial cancer—were included. Volunteers were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 500 mg of dostarlimab or a placebo intravenously in combination with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Doses were received every 3 weeks for the first six cycles. This was followed by 1000 mg of dostarlimab or the placebo intravenously every 6 weeks for up to 3 years.</p><p>Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed every 6 weeks until Cycle 8 and then every 9 weeks until Week 52. Imaging was then performed every 12 weeks. There were 118 volunteers (23.9%) who had dMMR, microsatellite instability–high tumors.</p><p>For the NRG-GY018 study, the primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Key secondary outcomes included safety, overall survival, and health-related quality of life as assessed, the researchers reported.</p><p>“At 12-months, the percent of patients who were without evidence of disease progression or death in the dMMR cohort was 74% for the pembrolizumab group and 38% for the placebo group,” the researchers wrote. In the pMMR cohort, median progression-free survival was 13.1 months for the pembrolizumab group and 8.7 months for the placebo group. “Adverse events were as expected for pembrolizumab and combination chemotherapy,” they added.</p><p>In the RUBY study, researchers noted improved overall survival in all populations. Overall, they reported that progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% for the dostarlimab group and 18.1% for the placebo group; the overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% for the dostarlimab group and 56.0% for the placebo group.</p><p>In the study population group with dMMR, microsatellite instability– high tumors, the estimated rate of progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% for the dostarlimab group patients and 15.7% for the placebo group patients.</p><p>The researchers reported that the most common adverse event that occurred or worsened during treatment was nausea, which affected 53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% in the placebo group. This was followed by alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%, respectively), with fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%, respectively) reported as the third most common adverse event. The researchers added that “severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group.”</p><p>“We believe our study [NRG-GY018 trial] will establish a new standardof-care treatment option for patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer,” says Ramez N. Eskander, MD, assistant professor of gynecologic oncology at the University of California San Diego. “Because of the novel design of the trial, with two independent patient cohorts, dMMR and pMMR endometrial cancer, there is confidence in the clinical benefit seen in both patient populations.”</p><p>Dr Eskander adds that the incorporation of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, continued as maintenance for up to 2 years of total treatment, resulted in a transformational 70% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the dMMR population, with 74% of the patients being free of disease recurrence or death at 12 months. “[These] results will define a new standard of care,” he says. “Furthermore, in the pMMR population, we did see an augmentation of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, when combined with chemotherapy, as evidenced in the 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, and a 4.4-month improvement in median progression free survival when compared to the control arm.”</p><p>Dr Fleming agrees. She also notes that the benefit seen in patients with dMMR endometrial cancer is dramatic, with the NRG-GY018 trial showing that 74% of the patients treated with pembrolizumab were alive and without progressive disease at 12 months versus only 38% of those who received the placebo.</p><p>“More surprisingly,” she adds, “benefit was also seen in patients with pMMR disease, with a median time until disease progression of 13.1 months for women receiving pembrolizumab versus only 8.7 months for those getting a placebo.”</p><p>She also believes that the standard of care from now going forward will be the addition of immunotherapy to frontline chemotherapy for women with advanced endometrial cancer, regardless of their microsatellite status. “Clearly, it would be desirable to have better markers to choose which of the patients with microsatellite stable disease truly benefit, but these do not yet exist,” she says.</p><p>Dr Fleming notes that there are several differences between the two studies. One major difference, she says, is the inclusion of women with carcinosarcoma in the RUBY trial as well as the longer follow-up of the RUBY study. She hopes that future analyses will confirm that women with carcinosarcoma benefit along with all other patients with endometrial cancer. Moreover, she says, the duration of immunotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy was only fourteen 6-week cycles (84 weeks) for the NRG-GY018 trial and was 3 years for dostarlimab in the RUBY trial. Obviously, if a shorter duration of immunotherapy is as beneficial as a longer one, that would be a preferable regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 5","pages":"445-447"},"PeriodicalIF":503.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21809","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy improves survival for endometrial cancer patients\",\"authors\":\"Mike Fillon\",\"doi\":\"10.3322/caac.21809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is encouraging news for patients with endometrial cancer based on the results of two recent phase 3 clinical trials: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may appreciably increase progression-free survival for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.</p><p>Both trials—NRG-GY018 and RUBY— were presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer in Tampa, Florida. Both also appear in <i>The New England Journal of Medicine.</i>\\n </p><p>The NRG-GY018 trial (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302312) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Enrolled were 816 volunteers with stage III/IVA, stage IVB, or recurrent endometrial cancer who were randomized 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab—an immune checkpoint inhibitor—plus chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin or a placebo plus chemotherapy for six cycles. They then received as many as 14 cycles of maintenance pembrolizumab or placebo.</p><p>All had newly diagnosed stage III or IVA disease with Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors– measurable disease or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer with or without measurable disease.</p><p>The volunteers were divided into two cohorts: those who had mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) disease and those who had mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) disease. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in both cohorts. Interim analyses were scheduled after 84 events of death or progression in the cohort with dMMR disease and at least 196 events in the cohort with pMMR disease.</p><p>The double-blind, placebo-controlled RUBY trial (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2216334) enrolled 494 patients with first recurrent or primary advanced stage III or IV endometrial cancer. Measurable disease was required for stages IIIA–C1, and 49 patients with carcinosarcoma—a rare and difficult-to-treat subset of endometrial cancer—were included. Volunteers were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 500 mg of dostarlimab or a placebo intravenously in combination with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Doses were received every 3 weeks for the first six cycles. This was followed by 1000 mg of dostarlimab or the placebo intravenously every 6 weeks for up to 3 years.</p><p>Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed every 6 weeks until Cycle 8 and then every 9 weeks until Week 52. Imaging was then performed every 12 weeks. There were 118 volunteers (23.9%) who had dMMR, microsatellite instability–high tumors.</p><p>For the NRG-GY018 study, the primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Key secondary outcomes included safety, overall survival, and health-related quality of life as assessed, the researchers reported.</p><p>“At 12-months, the percent of patients who were without evidence of disease progression or death in the dMMR cohort was 74% for the pembrolizumab group and 38% for the placebo group,” the researchers wrote. In the pMMR cohort, median progression-free survival was 13.1 months for the pembrolizumab group and 8.7 months for the placebo group. “Adverse events were as expected for pembrolizumab and combination chemotherapy,” they added.</p><p>In the RUBY study, researchers noted improved overall survival in all populations. Overall, they reported that progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% for the dostarlimab group and 18.1% for the placebo group; the overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% for the dostarlimab group and 56.0% for the placebo group.</p><p>In the study population group with dMMR, microsatellite instability– high tumors, the estimated rate of progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% for the dostarlimab group patients and 15.7% for the placebo group patients.</p><p>The researchers reported that the most common adverse event that occurred or worsened during treatment was nausea, which affected 53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% in the placebo group. This was followed by alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%, respectively), with fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%, respectively) reported as the third most common adverse event. The researchers added that “severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group.”</p><p>“We believe our study [NRG-GY018 trial] will establish a new standardof-care treatment option for patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer,” says Ramez N. Eskander, MD, assistant professor of gynecologic oncology at the University of California San Diego. “Because of the novel design of the trial, with two independent patient cohorts, dMMR and pMMR endometrial cancer, there is confidence in the clinical benefit seen in both patient populations.”</p><p>Dr Eskander adds that the incorporation of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, continued as maintenance for up to 2 years of total treatment, resulted in a transformational 70% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the dMMR population, with 74% of the patients being free of disease recurrence or death at 12 months. “[These] results will define a new standard of care,” he says. “Furthermore, in the pMMR population, we did see an augmentation of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, when combined with chemotherapy, as evidenced in the 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, and a 4.4-month improvement in median progression free survival when compared to the control arm.”</p><p>Dr Fleming agrees. She also notes that the benefit seen in patients with dMMR endometrial cancer is dramatic, with the NRG-GY018 trial showing that 74% of the patients treated with pembrolizumab were alive and without progressive disease at 12 months versus only 38% of those who received the placebo.</p><p>“More surprisingly,” she adds, “benefit was also seen in patients with pMMR disease, with a median time until disease progression of 13.1 months for women receiving pembrolizumab versus only 8.7 months for those getting a placebo.”</p><p>She also believes that the standard of care from now going forward will be the addition of immunotherapy to frontline chemotherapy for women with advanced endometrial cancer, regardless of their microsatellite status. “Clearly, it would be desirable to have better markers to choose which of the patients with microsatellite stable disease truly benefit, but these do not yet exist,” she says.</p><p>Dr Fleming notes that there are several differences between the two studies. One major difference, she says, is the inclusion of women with carcinosarcoma in the RUBY trial as well as the longer follow-up of the RUBY study. She hopes that future analyses will confirm that women with carcinosarcoma benefit along with all other patients with endometrial cancer. Moreover, she says, the duration of immunotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy was only fourteen 6-week cycles (84 weeks) for the NRG-GY018 trial and was 3 years for dostarlimab in the RUBY trial. Obviously, if a shorter duration of immunotherapy is as beneficial as a longer one, that would be a preferable regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"445-447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":503.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21809\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21809\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近两项3期临床试验的结果为子宫内膜癌患者带来了令人鼓舞的消息:免疫治疗联合化疗可能显著提高晚期或复发子宫内膜癌患者的无进展生存期。nrg - gy018和RUBY两项试验均在佛罗里达州坦帕市举行的妇科肿瘤学会2023年妇女癌症年会上发表。这两篇文章也发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》上。NRG-GY018试验(doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302312)是一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究。纳入了816名III/IVA期、IVB期或复发性子宫内膜癌的志愿者,他们以1:1的比例随机分配,接受派姆单抗(一种免疫检查点抑制剂)+紫杉醇和卡铂化疗或安慰剂+化疗,为期6个周期。然后,他们接受了多达14个周期的维持派姆单抗或安慰剂。所有患者都有新诊断的III期或IVA期疾病,有实体瘤反应评价标准-可测量疾病或IVB期或复发子宫内膜癌伴或不伴可测量疾病。志愿者被分为两组:错配修复缺陷组(dMMR)和错配修复熟练组(pMMR)。主要终点为两组患者的无进展生存期。在dMMR疾病队列中有84例死亡或进展事件,在pMMR疾病队列中至少有196例事件发生后,计划进行中期分析。这项双盲、安慰剂对照的RUBY试验(doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2216334)招募了494名首次复发或原发性晚期III期或IV期子宫内膜癌患者。IIIA-C1期需要可测量的疾病,并纳入了49名患有癌肉瘤(罕见且难以治疗的子宫内膜癌亚群)的患者。志愿者以1:1的比例随机分配,接受500毫克多司他单抗或安慰剂静脉注射,与紫杉醇加卡铂联合使用。在前六个周期中,每3周接受一次剂量。随后每6周静脉注射1000毫克dostarlimab或安慰剂,持续3年。计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像每6周进行一次,直到第8周,然后每9周进行一次,直到第52周。每12周进行一次影像学检查。dMMR、微卫星不稳定性高的肿瘤118例(23.9%)。对于NRG-GY018研究,主要结局是根据实体肿瘤反应评估标准(1.1版)由研究者评估的无进展生存期。研究人员报告说,主要的次要结果包括安全性、总生存率和与健康相关的生活质量。研究人员写道:“在12个月时,在dMMR队列中,无疾病进展或死亡证据的患者比例在派姆单抗组为74%,在安慰剂组为38%。”在pMMR队列中,派姆单抗组的中位无进展生存期为13.1个月,安慰剂组为8.7个月。他们补充说:“不良事件与预期的派姆单抗和联合化疗一样。”在RUBY研究中,研究人员注意到所有人群的总体生存率都有所提高。总的来说,他们报告说,24个月时,多司达单抗组的无进展生存率为36.1%,安慰剂组为18.1%;多司达单抗组24个月的总生存率为71.3%,安慰剂组为56.0%。在dMMR,微卫星不稳定性-高肿瘤的研究人群中,dostarlimumab组患者24个月无进展生存率估计为61.4%,安慰剂组患者为15.7%。研究人员报告说,在治疗过程中发生或恶化的最常见不良事件是恶心,多斯塔利单抗组和安慰剂组分别影响53.9%和45.9%的患者。其次是脱发(分别为53.5%和50.0%),疲劳(分别为51.9%和54.5%)是第三大最常见的不良事件。研究人员补充说,“严重和严重的不良事件在多司达单抗组比安慰剂组更频繁。“我们相信我们的研究[NRG-GY018试验]将为晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌患者建立一种新的标准治疗选择,”加州大学圣地亚哥分校妇科肿瘤学助理教授Ramez N. Eskander医学博士说。“由于该试验设计新颖,有两个独立的患者队列,dMMR和pMMR子宫内膜癌,因此对两种患者群体的临床获益都有信心。 Eskander博士补充说,pembrolizumab联合化疗,持续维持长达2年的总治疗,导致dMMR人群中疾病进展或死亡风险降低70%,74%的患者在12个月时无疾病复发或死亡。“(这些)结果将定义一种新的护理标准,”他说。“此外,在pMMR人群中,我们确实看到了免疫检查点抑制反应的增强,当与化疗联合使用时,与对照组相比,疾病进展或死亡风险降低46%,中位无进展生存期提高4.4个月。”弗莱明博士对此表示赞同。她还指出,dMMR子宫内膜癌患者的获益是显著的,NRG-GY018试验显示,74%接受派姆单抗治疗的患者在12个月时存活且无进展性疾病,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者只有38%。“更令人惊讶的是,”她补充说,“pMMR疾病患者也有获益,接受派姆单抗的女性疾病进展的中位时间为13.1个月,而接受安慰剂的女性只有8.7个月。”她还认为,从现在开始,无论微卫星状态如何,晚期子宫内膜癌妇女的治疗标准将是在一线化疗的基础上增加免疫治疗。她说:“显然,有更好的标记物来选择哪些微卫星稳定型疾病的患者真正受益是可取的,但是这些还不存在。”弗莱明博士指出,这两项研究之间存在一些差异。她说,一个主要的区别是RUBY试验中包括了患有癌肉瘤的女性,并且RUBY研究的随访时间更长。她希望未来的分析能够证实患有癌肉瘤的女性和所有其他子宫内膜癌患者一样受益。此外,她说,在NRG-GY018试验中,化疗完成后的免疫治疗持续时间仅为14个6周周期(84周),而在RUBY试验中,dostarlimumab为3年。显然,如果较短时间的免疫治疗与较长时间的免疫治疗同样有益,这将是一种更可取的方案。
Adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy improves survival for endometrial cancer patients
There is encouraging news for patients with endometrial cancer based on the results of two recent phase 3 clinical trials: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may appreciably increase progression-free survival for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.
Both trials—NRG-GY018 and RUBY— were presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer in Tampa, Florida. Both also appear in The New England Journal of Medicine.
The NRG-GY018 trial (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302312) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Enrolled were 816 volunteers with stage III/IVA, stage IVB, or recurrent endometrial cancer who were randomized 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab—an immune checkpoint inhibitor—plus chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin or a placebo plus chemotherapy for six cycles. They then received as many as 14 cycles of maintenance pembrolizumab or placebo.
All had newly diagnosed stage III or IVA disease with Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors– measurable disease or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer with or without measurable disease.
The volunteers were divided into two cohorts: those who had mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) disease and those who had mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) disease. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in both cohorts. Interim analyses were scheduled after 84 events of death or progression in the cohort with dMMR disease and at least 196 events in the cohort with pMMR disease.
The double-blind, placebo-controlled RUBY trial (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2216334) enrolled 494 patients with first recurrent or primary advanced stage III or IV endometrial cancer. Measurable disease was required for stages IIIA–C1, and 49 patients with carcinosarcoma—a rare and difficult-to-treat subset of endometrial cancer—were included. Volunteers were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 500 mg of dostarlimab or a placebo intravenously in combination with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Doses were received every 3 weeks for the first six cycles. This was followed by 1000 mg of dostarlimab or the placebo intravenously every 6 weeks for up to 3 years.
Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed every 6 weeks until Cycle 8 and then every 9 weeks until Week 52. Imaging was then performed every 12 weeks. There were 118 volunteers (23.9%) who had dMMR, microsatellite instability–high tumors.
For the NRG-GY018 study, the primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Key secondary outcomes included safety, overall survival, and health-related quality of life as assessed, the researchers reported.
“At 12-months, the percent of patients who were without evidence of disease progression or death in the dMMR cohort was 74% for the pembrolizumab group and 38% for the placebo group,” the researchers wrote. In the pMMR cohort, median progression-free survival was 13.1 months for the pembrolizumab group and 8.7 months for the placebo group. “Adverse events were as expected for pembrolizumab and combination chemotherapy,” they added.
In the RUBY study, researchers noted improved overall survival in all populations. Overall, they reported that progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% for the dostarlimab group and 18.1% for the placebo group; the overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% for the dostarlimab group and 56.0% for the placebo group.
In the study population group with dMMR, microsatellite instability– high tumors, the estimated rate of progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% for the dostarlimab group patients and 15.7% for the placebo group patients.
The researchers reported that the most common adverse event that occurred or worsened during treatment was nausea, which affected 53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% in the placebo group. This was followed by alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%, respectively), with fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%, respectively) reported as the third most common adverse event. The researchers added that “severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group.”
“We believe our study [NRG-GY018 trial] will establish a new standardof-care treatment option for patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer,” says Ramez N. Eskander, MD, assistant professor of gynecologic oncology at the University of California San Diego. “Because of the novel design of the trial, with two independent patient cohorts, dMMR and pMMR endometrial cancer, there is confidence in the clinical benefit seen in both patient populations.”
Dr Eskander adds that the incorporation of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, continued as maintenance for up to 2 years of total treatment, resulted in a transformational 70% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the dMMR population, with 74% of the patients being free of disease recurrence or death at 12 months. “[These] results will define a new standard of care,” he says. “Furthermore, in the pMMR population, we did see an augmentation of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, when combined with chemotherapy, as evidenced in the 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, and a 4.4-month improvement in median progression free survival when compared to the control arm.”
Dr Fleming agrees. She also notes that the benefit seen in patients with dMMR endometrial cancer is dramatic, with the NRG-GY018 trial showing that 74% of the patients treated with pembrolizumab were alive and without progressive disease at 12 months versus only 38% of those who received the placebo.
“More surprisingly,” she adds, “benefit was also seen in patients with pMMR disease, with a median time until disease progression of 13.1 months for women receiving pembrolizumab versus only 8.7 months for those getting a placebo.”
She also believes that the standard of care from now going forward will be the addition of immunotherapy to frontline chemotherapy for women with advanced endometrial cancer, regardless of their microsatellite status. “Clearly, it would be desirable to have better markers to choose which of the patients with microsatellite stable disease truly benefit, but these do not yet exist,” she says.
Dr Fleming notes that there are several differences between the two studies. One major difference, she says, is the inclusion of women with carcinosarcoma in the RUBY trial as well as the longer follow-up of the RUBY study. She hopes that future analyses will confirm that women with carcinosarcoma benefit along with all other patients with endometrial cancer. Moreover, she says, the duration of immunotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy was only fourteen 6-week cycles (84 weeks) for the NRG-GY018 trial and was 3 years for dostarlimab in the RUBY trial. Obviously, if a shorter duration of immunotherapy is as beneficial as a longer one, that would be a preferable regimen.
期刊介绍:
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians" has been published by the American Cancer Society since 1950, making it one of the oldest peer-reviewed journals in oncology. It maintains the highest impact factor among all ISI-ranked journals. The journal effectively reaches a broad and diverse audience of health professionals, offering a unique platform to disseminate information on cancer prevention, early detection, various treatment modalities, palliative care, advocacy matters, quality-of-life topics, and more. As the premier journal of the American Cancer Society, it publishes mission-driven content that significantly influences patient care.