{"title":"钢笔比氢弹更有威力","authors":"Izadora Xavier do Monte","doi":"10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through discourse analysis of interviews with United Nations Security Council diplomats, this essay attempts to deconstruct the binary that opposes power politics and international law and morality. It intends to show that the context (or ‘conditions’) of production of UNSC documents – international law – does not counterbalance the hierarchies that define international power politics, but depends on and reinforces such hierarchies. International law makes the privileged position of some members more acceptable even in a context where the ideal of nations’ self-determination and democracy would seem to demand otherwise. It also allows the most powerful to determine what is to be considered fundamental for the international community, and who is to be constrained by force in these contexts, with important material effects.","PeriodicalId":46172,"journal":{"name":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"669 - 686"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131180","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pen is Mightier than the H-Bomb\",\"authors\":\"Izadora Xavier do Monte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through discourse analysis of interviews with United Nations Security Council diplomats, this essay attempts to deconstruct the binary that opposes power politics and international law and morality. It intends to show that the context (or ‘conditions’) of production of UNSC documents – international law – does not counterbalance the hierarchies that define international power politics, but depends on and reinforces such hierarchies. International law makes the privileged position of some members more acceptable even in a context where the ideal of nations’ self-determination and democracy would seem to demand otherwise. It also allows the most powerful to determine what is to be considered fundamental for the international community, and who is to be constrained by force in these contexts, with important material effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"669 - 686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131180\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1131180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Through discourse analysis of interviews with United Nations Security Council diplomats, this essay attempts to deconstruct the binary that opposes power politics and international law and morality. It intends to show that the context (or ‘conditions’) of production of UNSC documents – international law – does not counterbalance the hierarchies that define international power politics, but depends on and reinforces such hierarchies. International law makes the privileged position of some members more acceptable even in a context where the ideal of nations’ self-determination and democracy would seem to demand otherwise. It also allows the most powerful to determine what is to be considered fundamental for the international community, and who is to be constrained by force in these contexts, with important material effects.