{"title":"不对称","authors":"Cóilín Parsons","doi":"10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In introducing this special issue on South African and Irish literature and culture, this essay offers a critical overview of the field of comparisons between these two former colonies. Though the cultural output of both sites is often figured as exceptional or incomparable, there is a constant drumbeat of popular comparisons between South Africa and Ireland, and the disciplines of history, political science, and conflict resolution have long compared Irish and South African trajectories in the twentieth century. Comparisons often rely on an assumed solidarity or affinity based on a shared colonial history, but the radically different economic and political realities of the two sites make such assumptions unstable. This introduction suggests it is time for a more nuanced set of comparative studies that recognize the profoundly asymmetrical relations between South Africa and Ireland, as well as the potential limits of comparative practice, and yet the gains from bringing together two anomalous postcolonial case studies. Drawing on the work of Peter D. McDonald, the essay makes a case for listening carefully to the idiosyncrasies of a “tangled archive” of South African–Irish relations in order to shed light on what postcolonial comparison might look like in the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":46172,"journal":{"name":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"1 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetries\",\"authors\":\"Cóilín Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In introducing this special issue on South African and Irish literature and culture, this essay offers a critical overview of the field of comparisons between these two former colonies. Though the cultural output of both sites is often figured as exceptional or incomparable, there is a constant drumbeat of popular comparisons between South Africa and Ireland, and the disciplines of history, political science, and conflict resolution have long compared Irish and South African trajectories in the twentieth century. Comparisons often rely on an assumed solidarity or affinity based on a shared colonial history, but the radically different economic and political realities of the two sites make such assumptions unstable. This introduction suggests it is time for a more nuanced set of comparative studies that recognize the profoundly asymmetrical relations between South Africa and Ireland, as well as the potential limits of comparative practice, and yet the gains from bringing together two anomalous postcolonial case studies. Drawing on the work of Peter D. McDonald, the essay makes a case for listening carefully to the idiosyncrasies of a “tangled archive” of South African–Irish relations in order to shed light on what postcolonial comparison might look like in the twenty-first century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
在介绍这个关于南非和爱尔兰文学和文化的特刊时,本文对这两个前殖民地之间的比较领域提供了一个批判性的概述。虽然这两个地方的文化产出通常被认为是特殊的或无法比拟的,但南非和爱尔兰之间的比较一直很流行,历史、政治科学和冲突解决等学科长期以来一直在比较爱尔兰和南非在20世纪的发展轨迹。比较通常依赖于基于共同殖民历史的假设的团结或亲近感,但两个地点的经济和政治现实截然不同,使得这种假设不稳定。这篇引言表明,现在是时候进行一组更细致的比较研究,认识到南非和爱尔兰之间深刻的不对称关系,以及比较实践的潜在局限性,然而,将两个异常的后殖民案例研究结合在一起会有所收获。这篇文章借鉴了彼得·d·麦克唐纳(Peter D. McDonald)的作品,仔细倾听南非与爱尔兰关系“错综复杂的档案”的特质,以阐明二十一世纪后殖民时期的比较可能是什么样子。
In introducing this special issue on South African and Irish literature and culture, this essay offers a critical overview of the field of comparisons between these two former colonies. Though the cultural output of both sites is often figured as exceptional or incomparable, there is a constant drumbeat of popular comparisons between South Africa and Ireland, and the disciplines of history, political science, and conflict resolution have long compared Irish and South African trajectories in the twentieth century. Comparisons often rely on an assumed solidarity or affinity based on a shared colonial history, but the radically different economic and political realities of the two sites make such assumptions unstable. This introduction suggests it is time for a more nuanced set of comparative studies that recognize the profoundly asymmetrical relations between South Africa and Ireland, as well as the potential limits of comparative practice, and yet the gains from bringing together two anomalous postcolonial case studies. Drawing on the work of Peter D. McDonald, the essay makes a case for listening carefully to the idiosyncrasies of a “tangled archive” of South African–Irish relations in order to shed light on what postcolonial comparison might look like in the twenty-first century.