通过传播预防性创新的过程(重新)产生保健不平等:社会经济地位的动态影响

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Sociology Review Pub Date : 2019-04-11 DOI:10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027
Ángel R. Zapata-Moya, Barbara Willems, Piet Bracke
{"title":"通过传播预防性创新的过程(重新)产生保健不平等:社会经济地位的动态影响","authors":"Ángel R. Zapata-Moya, Barbara Willems, Piet Bracke","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fundamental Cause Theory suggests the replacement of mechanisms that produce the persistent relationship between socioeconomic status and health over time. Understanding how this process operates is central to explaining the reproduction of health inequality. We use data from the Onco-barometer survey (2010) to test a set of hypotheses derived from FCT, Diffusion Of Innovations theory and the intersection between these theories to examine how socioeconomic inequality emerges and evolves across the cycle of diffusion of six relevant preventive practices in Spain: faecal occult blood tests, prostate-specific antigen tests, Papanicolaou tests, mammograms, cholesterol readings and blood-pressure checks. Because these preventive measures are characterised by differing rates of spontaneous knowledge and use amongst the Spanish population, we assume that they are at different stages in the diffusion cycle. Results suggest that SES has a dynamic influence according to the diffusion stage of each preventive measure. We argue that the conjunction of these theories offers a dynamic ‘imagery’ that can help to explain the generation and diminishment of inequalities. Moreover, this integration has the potential to bring ‘social change’ back into the study of health inequalities, which is essential to understanding equitable (and inequitable) returns produced by preventive innovations.","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"177 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (re)production of health inequalities through the process of disseminating preventive innovations: the dynamic influence of socioeconomic status\",\"authors\":\"Ángel R. Zapata-Moya, Barbara Willems, Piet Bracke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fundamental Cause Theory suggests the replacement of mechanisms that produce the persistent relationship between socioeconomic status and health over time. Understanding how this process operates is central to explaining the reproduction of health inequality. We use data from the Onco-barometer survey (2010) to test a set of hypotheses derived from FCT, Diffusion Of Innovations theory and the intersection between these theories to examine how socioeconomic inequality emerges and evolves across the cycle of diffusion of six relevant preventive practices in Spain: faecal occult blood tests, prostate-specific antigen tests, Papanicolaou tests, mammograms, cholesterol readings and blood-pressure checks. Because these preventive measures are characterised by differing rates of spontaneous knowledge and use amongst the Spanish population, we assume that they are at different stages in the diffusion cycle. Results suggest that SES has a dynamic influence according to the diffusion stage of each preventive measure. We argue that the conjunction of these theories offers a dynamic ‘imagery’ that can help to explain the generation and diminishment of inequalities. Moreover, this integration has the potential to bring ‘social change’ back into the study of health inequalities, which is essential to understanding equitable (and inequitable) returns produced by preventive innovations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"177 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2019.1601027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

【摘要】根本原因理论认为,随着时间的推移,产生社会经济地位与健康之间持续关系的机制将被取代。了解这一过程是如何运作的,对于解释健康不平等的再现至关重要。我们使用来自肿瘤晴雨表调查(2010)的数据来检验一系列假设,这些假设来自于FCT、创新扩散理论以及这些理论之间的交叉,以检验西班牙六种相关预防措施(粪便潜血检查、前列腺特异性抗原检查、帕帕尼柯拉氏检查、乳房x光检查、胆固醇读数和血压检查)的传播周期中社会经济不平等是如何出现和演变的。由于这些预防措施的特点是在西班牙人口中自发认识和使用的比率不同,我们假设它们处于传播周期的不同阶段。结果表明,根据各预防措施的扩散阶段,SES的影响是动态的。我们认为,这些理论的结合提供了一个动态的“意象”,可以帮助解释不平等的产生和减少。此外,这种整合有可能将“社会变革”重新纳入对卫生不平等的研究,这对于理解预防性创新产生的公平(和不公平)回报至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The (re)production of health inequalities through the process of disseminating preventive innovations: the dynamic influence of socioeconomic status
ABSTRACT Fundamental Cause Theory suggests the replacement of mechanisms that produce the persistent relationship between socioeconomic status and health over time. Understanding how this process operates is central to explaining the reproduction of health inequality. We use data from the Onco-barometer survey (2010) to test a set of hypotheses derived from FCT, Diffusion Of Innovations theory and the intersection between these theories to examine how socioeconomic inequality emerges and evolves across the cycle of diffusion of six relevant preventive practices in Spain: faecal occult blood tests, prostate-specific antigen tests, Papanicolaou tests, mammograms, cholesterol readings and blood-pressure checks. Because these preventive measures are characterised by differing rates of spontaneous knowledge and use amongst the Spanish population, we assume that they are at different stages in the diffusion cycle. Results suggest that SES has a dynamic influence according to the diffusion stage of each preventive measure. We argue that the conjunction of these theories offers a dynamic ‘imagery’ that can help to explain the generation and diminishment of inequalities. Moreover, this integration has the potential to bring ‘social change’ back into the study of health inequalities, which is essential to understanding equitable (and inequitable) returns produced by preventive innovations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
On comfort in palliative care. Multidisciplinary team meetings: dynamic routines that (re)make palliative care. Empathetic knowledge: conceptualising modes of knowing within families marked by illness. Orchestrating rhythms in autism care: enacting parental expertise in and through time. Sampling and recruiting LGBTQ+ populations in health research: reflections on community consultations about antibiotic resistant STIs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1