大卫·斯塔尔,《台风行动:希特勒进军莫斯科》,1941年10月

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Slavic Military Studies Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398
Romedio Graf von Thun-Hohenstein
{"title":"大卫·斯塔尔,《台风行动:希特勒进军莫斯科》,1941年10月","authors":"Romedio Graf von Thun-Hohenstein","doi":"10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the reviewer, it is an astonishing yet welcome fact that the German-Soviet War of 1941–1945 is still being covered by such recently published books such as Niklas Zetterling and Anders Franksonʼs The Drive on Moscow, or Jack Radey and Charles Sharpʼs The Defense of Moscow 1941, while Lev Lopukhovsky has written a major study about the Viazʼma encirclement battle. There is also the meticulous and profound, but somewhat less accessible, day-to-day four-volume study about the Battle for Smolensk, in which David Glantz has cast new light on this complex operation, which, according to a detailed official study by General G. F. Krivosheev, resulted in the Soviet loss of 759,974 soldiers. Now David Stahel, whose previous books aboutOperation Barbarossa and the battle for Kiev asserted that Hitlerʼs decision to attack the Soviet Union on 22 June and divert its forces to conduct the encirclement battle of Kiev in September sealed the fate of the Third Reich in the long run, has produced a new volume about Operation Typhoon and the German defeat at Moscow in December 1941. This new work, which exploits predominantly German sources, should be evaluated and compared with the major studies written by General Klaus Reinhardt and Ernst Klink, which were published in 1971 and 1983 respectively, to determine whether Stahel provides new and deeper insights. Apart from his German-centered approach, Stahel points out that the main focus of this book is on the role of German panzer and motorized divisions, whose operations produced understandable limitations on the German Army’s operational capabilities. However, despite acknowledging the fact that the invading German Army of June 1941 was principally an infantry army, he does not adequately cover the many problems generated by the army’s organizational structure. For example, Army Group Centerʼs forces on 2 October 1941 numbered 46 infantry, 13 panzer, and seven motorized infantry divisions, although unlike the US infantry divisions in June 1944, the German motorized divisions were only partially motorized. Even though the Wehrmacht began the war on 22 June 1941 with around 600,000 motor vehicles, Stahel estimates it lost between ʻ180,000 and 240,000ʼ vehicles by the end of September, which is a bit inaccurate. Here, he should have mentioned that the Army Command (Allgemeines Heeresamt) had declared on 1 May 1941 that the monthly attrition rate up to this time, while fighting in countries with good infrastructures like France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, was as much as 12 percent. This meant that, under the far worse conditions of the Russian road network, the monthly attrition rate went sky-high. The author might also have mentioned that the attrition rate was not the only problem with motor verhicles, since the number of differing spare parts for vehicles within Army Group Center reached","PeriodicalId":35160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Military Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stahel, David, Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941\",\"authors\":\"Romedio Graf von Thun-Hohenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the reviewer, it is an astonishing yet welcome fact that the German-Soviet War of 1941–1945 is still being covered by such recently published books such as Niklas Zetterling and Anders Franksonʼs The Drive on Moscow, or Jack Radey and Charles Sharpʼs The Defense of Moscow 1941, while Lev Lopukhovsky has written a major study about the Viazʼma encirclement battle. There is also the meticulous and profound, but somewhat less accessible, day-to-day four-volume study about the Battle for Smolensk, in which David Glantz has cast new light on this complex operation, which, according to a detailed official study by General G. F. Krivosheev, resulted in the Soviet loss of 759,974 soldiers. Now David Stahel, whose previous books aboutOperation Barbarossa and the battle for Kiev asserted that Hitlerʼs decision to attack the Soviet Union on 22 June and divert its forces to conduct the encirclement battle of Kiev in September sealed the fate of the Third Reich in the long run, has produced a new volume about Operation Typhoon and the German defeat at Moscow in December 1941. This new work, which exploits predominantly German sources, should be evaluated and compared with the major studies written by General Klaus Reinhardt and Ernst Klink, which were published in 1971 and 1983 respectively, to determine whether Stahel provides new and deeper insights. Apart from his German-centered approach, Stahel points out that the main focus of this book is on the role of German panzer and motorized divisions, whose operations produced understandable limitations on the German Army’s operational capabilities. However, despite acknowledging the fact that the invading German Army of June 1941 was principally an infantry army, he does not adequately cover the many problems generated by the army’s organizational structure. For example, Army Group Centerʼs forces on 2 October 1941 numbered 46 infantry, 13 panzer, and seven motorized infantry divisions, although unlike the US infantry divisions in June 1944, the German motorized divisions were only partially motorized. Even though the Wehrmacht began the war on 22 June 1941 with around 600,000 motor vehicles, Stahel estimates it lost between ʻ180,000 and 240,000ʼ vehicles by the end of September, which is a bit inaccurate. Here, he should have mentioned that the Army Command (Allgemeines Heeresamt) had declared on 1 May 1941 that the monthly attrition rate up to this time, while fighting in countries with good infrastructures like France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, was as much as 12 percent. This meant that, under the far worse conditions of the Russian road network, the monthly attrition rate went sky-high. The author might also have mentioned that the attrition rate was not the only problem with motor verhicles, since the number of differing spare parts for vehicles within Army Group Center reached\",\"PeriodicalId\":35160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Slavic Military Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Slavic Military Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Slavic Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1200398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于评论家来说,一个令人惊讶但又可喜的事实是,1941 - 1945年的德苏战争仍然被最近出版的书籍所覆盖,比如尼古拉斯·泽特林和安德斯·弗兰克森的《莫斯科之旅》,或者杰克·拉迪和查尔斯·夏普的《1941年莫斯科保卫战》,而列夫·洛普霍夫斯基写了一篇关于维亚兹马包围战的重要研究。还有一本细致而深刻,但不太容易理解的关于斯摩棱斯克战役的日常四卷本研究,大卫·格兰茨(David Glantz)在书中对这场复杂的行动进行了新的阐释。根据g·f·克里沃舍耶夫(G. F. Krivosheev)将军的详细官方研究,这场战役导致苏联损失了759,974名士兵。现在,大卫·斯塔尔(David Stahel)出版了一本关于巴巴罗萨行动和基辅战役的新书,他断言希特勒在6月22日进攻苏联,并在9月转移其部队进行基辅包围战的决定,从长远来看决定了第三帝国的命运。他出版了一本关于台风行动和1941年12月德国在莫斯科战败的新书。这本主要利用德国资料的新著作,应该与克劳斯·莱因哈特将军和恩斯特·克林克将军分别于1971年和1983年发表的主要研究进行评估和比较,以确定Stahel是否提供了新的和更深入的见解。除了他以德国为中心的方法之外,Stahel指出这本书的主要焦点是德国装甲师和摩托化师的作用,他们的行动对德国陆军的作战能力产生了可以理解的限制。然而,尽管他承认1941年6月入侵的德国军队主要是一支步兵军队,但他并没有充分讨论军队组织结构所产生的许多问题。例如,1941年10月2日,中央集团军群的部队有46个步兵师,13个装甲师和7个摩托化步兵师,尽管与1944年6月的美国步兵师不同,德国摩托化师只是部分摩托化。尽管德国国防军在1941年6月22日开战时拥有大约60万辆机动车辆,但Stahel估计到9月底德军损失了18万至24万辆车辆,这有点不准确。在这里,他应该提到陆军司令部(Allgemeines Heeresamt)在1941年5月1日宣布,到目前为止,在法国、比利时和荷兰等基础设施良好的国家作战时,每月的损失率高达12%。这意味着,在俄罗斯糟糕得多的道路网络条件下,每月的流失率飙升。发件人还可以提到,减员率并不是机动车辆的唯一问题,因为中央集团军群内车辆的不同零件数量已经达到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stahel, David, Operation Typhoon: Hitler’s March on Moscow, October 1941
For the reviewer, it is an astonishing yet welcome fact that the German-Soviet War of 1941–1945 is still being covered by such recently published books such as Niklas Zetterling and Anders Franksonʼs The Drive on Moscow, or Jack Radey and Charles Sharpʼs The Defense of Moscow 1941, while Lev Lopukhovsky has written a major study about the Viazʼma encirclement battle. There is also the meticulous and profound, but somewhat less accessible, day-to-day four-volume study about the Battle for Smolensk, in which David Glantz has cast new light on this complex operation, which, according to a detailed official study by General G. F. Krivosheev, resulted in the Soviet loss of 759,974 soldiers. Now David Stahel, whose previous books aboutOperation Barbarossa and the battle for Kiev asserted that Hitlerʼs decision to attack the Soviet Union on 22 June and divert its forces to conduct the encirclement battle of Kiev in September sealed the fate of the Third Reich in the long run, has produced a new volume about Operation Typhoon and the German defeat at Moscow in December 1941. This new work, which exploits predominantly German sources, should be evaluated and compared with the major studies written by General Klaus Reinhardt and Ernst Klink, which were published in 1971 and 1983 respectively, to determine whether Stahel provides new and deeper insights. Apart from his German-centered approach, Stahel points out that the main focus of this book is on the role of German panzer and motorized divisions, whose operations produced understandable limitations on the German Army’s operational capabilities. However, despite acknowledging the fact that the invading German Army of June 1941 was principally an infantry army, he does not adequately cover the many problems generated by the army’s organizational structure. For example, Army Group Centerʼs forces on 2 October 1941 numbered 46 infantry, 13 panzer, and seven motorized infantry divisions, although unlike the US infantry divisions in June 1944, the German motorized divisions were only partially motorized. Even though the Wehrmacht began the war on 22 June 1941 with around 600,000 motor vehicles, Stahel estimates it lost between ʻ180,000 and 240,000ʼ vehicles by the end of September, which is a bit inaccurate. Here, he should have mentioned that the Army Command (Allgemeines Heeresamt) had declared on 1 May 1941 that the monthly attrition rate up to this time, while fighting in countries with good infrastructures like France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, was as much as 12 percent. This meant that, under the far worse conditions of the Russian road network, the monthly attrition rate went sky-high. The author might also have mentioned that the attrition rate was not the only problem with motor verhicles, since the number of differing spare parts for vehicles within Army Group Center reached
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Slavic Military Studies
Journal of Slavic Military Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Autonomous weapon systems and IHL compliance: A constrained legal optimisation problem Detecting deceit within a predominantly true statement using two parallel assessment methods: A pilot study Long-term post traumatic growth after moral- and victim-traumas among Norwegian UN military peacekeepers: the impact of emotional distress and leadership Butcher’s Bills: Engagement-level preponderance and casualties in the French Revolution Wars and Napoleonic Wars, 1792–1815 Examining the roots of turnover intentions in the Royal Norwegian Navy, the role of embeddedness, work-life conflict and predictability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1