感化官管理策略与态度之研究

James R. Andretta, T. Odom, Fannie Barksdale, Michael E. Barnes, Aaron M. Ramirez, Malcolm H. Woodland
{"title":"感化官管理策略与态度之研究","authors":"James R. Andretta, T. Odom, Fannie Barksdale, Michael E. Barnes, Aaron M. Ramirez, Malcolm H. Woodland","doi":"10.1080/1936928X.2014.958644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examined management strategy profiles in probation officers (POs; N = 57; African American = 96%; male = 53%) using Probation Practices Assessment Survey scores. Results of a cluster analysis yielded three profiles: compliance, therapeutic, and intensive. POs with a compliance profile were characterized by high frequency of deterrence and confrontation strategies and less frequent use of behavioral, counseling, and restorative strategies when compared to colleagues. Therapeutic POs reported to use deterrence and confrontation strategies infrequently. At the same time, therapeutic POs reported to use behavioral and counseling tactics, and to a lesser degree restorative approaches, on a slightly above average basis. The intensive profile was marked by the frequent use of all different types of probation approaches. Results also showed that management profiles were indicative of attitudes toward punitiveness, mental health rehabilitation, and response to probation in juveniles.","PeriodicalId":89974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic social work","volume":"4 1","pages":"150 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1936928X.2014.958644","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination of Management Strategies and Attitudes Among Probation Officers\",\"authors\":\"James R. Andretta, T. Odom, Fannie Barksdale, Michael E. Barnes, Aaron M. Ramirez, Malcolm H. Woodland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1936928X.2014.958644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors examined management strategy profiles in probation officers (POs; N = 57; African American = 96%; male = 53%) using Probation Practices Assessment Survey scores. Results of a cluster analysis yielded three profiles: compliance, therapeutic, and intensive. POs with a compliance profile were characterized by high frequency of deterrence and confrontation strategies and less frequent use of behavioral, counseling, and restorative strategies when compared to colleagues. Therapeutic POs reported to use deterrence and confrontation strategies infrequently. At the same time, therapeutic POs reported to use behavioral and counseling tactics, and to a lesser degree restorative approaches, on a slightly above average basis. The intensive profile was marked by the frequent use of all different types of probation approaches. Results also showed that management profiles were indicative of attitudes toward punitiveness, mental health rehabilitation, and response to probation in juveniles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic social work\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"150 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1936928X.2014.958644\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2014.958644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2014.958644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

作者考察了缓刑官(POs)的管理策略概况;N = 57;非裔美国人= 96%;男性= 53%),使用缓刑实践评估调查分数。聚类分析的结果产生了三个特征:依从性、治疗性和强化性。与同事相比,具有依从性的POs的特点是威慑和对抗策略的使用频率较高,而行为、咨询和恢复性策略的使用频率较低。据报道,治疗性POs很少使用威慑和对抗策略。与此同时,据报道,治疗性POs使用行为和咨询策略,并在较小程度上使用恢复性方法,略高于平均水平。密集的档案的特点是经常使用各种不同类型的缓刑方法。结果还表明,管理档案表明了青少年对惩罚的态度、心理健康康复和对缓刑的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Examination of Management Strategies and Attitudes Among Probation Officers
The authors examined management strategy profiles in probation officers (POs; N = 57; African American = 96%; male = 53%) using Probation Practices Assessment Survey scores. Results of a cluster analysis yielded three profiles: compliance, therapeutic, and intensive. POs with a compliance profile were characterized by high frequency of deterrence and confrontation strategies and less frequent use of behavioral, counseling, and restorative strategies when compared to colleagues. Therapeutic POs reported to use deterrence and confrontation strategies infrequently. At the same time, therapeutic POs reported to use behavioral and counseling tactics, and to a lesser degree restorative approaches, on a slightly above average basis. The intensive profile was marked by the frequent use of all different types of probation approaches. Results also showed that management profiles were indicative of attitudes toward punitiveness, mental health rehabilitation, and response to probation in juveniles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integration of Social Work Values and Principles in Police Work Best Practices in Tele-Forensic Methods of Gathering Data Embedding Social Work into a Police Department in the South Forensic Social Work in the Slovak Republic The Sequential Intercept Model and Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) for People with Serious Mental Illness: Implications for Social Work Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1