易卜生接受史比较的六个要点

IF 0.6 0 THEATER Ibsen Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15021866.2014.937151
Giuliano D’Amico
{"title":"易卜生接受史比较的六个要点","authors":"Giuliano D’Amico","doi":"10.1080/15021866.2014.937151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the postulates of literary comparison [ . . . ] is that an identity or kinship can be established between literary objects that are far removed in time and space [ . . . ], or between different national productions and traditions. In all such cases, nations and national spaces are viewed as distinct ensembles, closed in on themselves, entities that are irreducible to one another yet produce, on the basis of an autarchic specificity, literary objects that are more or less comparable. (2007, 214)","PeriodicalId":41285,"journal":{"name":"Ibsen Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"37 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2014.937151","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six Points for a Comparative Ibsen Reception History\",\"authors\":\"Giuliano D’Amico\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021866.2014.937151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the postulates of literary comparison [ . . . ] is that an identity or kinship can be established between literary objects that are far removed in time and space [ . . . ], or between different national productions and traditions. In all such cases, nations and national spaces are viewed as distinct ensembles, closed in on themselves, entities that are irreducible to one another yet produce, on the basis of an autarchic specificity, literary objects that are more or less comparable. (2007, 214)\",\"PeriodicalId\":41285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ibsen Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2014.937151\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ibsen Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2014.937151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibsen Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2014.937151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

文学比较的一个前提是……是在时间和空间上相距甚远的文学对象之间可以建立一种身份或亲属关系[…]],或在不同的民族作品和传统之间。在所有这些情况下,国家和国家空间被视为截然不同的整体,彼此封闭,实体彼此不可约,但基于专制的特殊性,文学对象或多或少具有可比性。(2007, 214)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Six Points for a Comparative Ibsen Reception History
One of the postulates of literary comparison [ . . . ] is that an identity or kinship can be established between literary objects that are far removed in time and space [ . . . ], or between different national productions and traditions. In all such cases, nations and national spaces are viewed as distinct ensembles, closed in on themselves, entities that are irreducible to one another yet produce, on the basis of an autarchic specificity, literary objects that are more or less comparable. (2007, 214)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ibsen Studies
Ibsen Studies THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
A Brief History of the Centre for Ibsen Studies Ibsen in performance A Short History of Ibsen Reception Studies Ibsen Studies and Adaptation The Rise of Digital Humanities Approaches to Ibsen Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1