{"title":"巴西与多边贸易体制的起源","authors":"Rogério de Souza Farias","doi":"10.1080/07075332.2014.897248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Brazil's position in multilateral trade negotiations from 1946 to 1960. It is an original contribution, as the focus only on developed countries in the literature on the creation of the multilateral trading system portrays developing countries as a monolithic bloc and does not use non-English primary sources. It is argued that Brazil was far from being a free rider in tariff negotiations and the position the country had on this issue can be explained by domestic rather than international constraints. This period also shaped Brazil's belief about the international trade order, something that had great relevance in later periods.","PeriodicalId":46534,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"37 1","pages":"303 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07075332.2014.897248","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brazil and the Origins of the Multilateral Trading System\",\"authors\":\"Rogério de Souza Farias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07075332.2014.897248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines Brazil's position in multilateral trade negotiations from 1946 to 1960. It is an original contribution, as the focus only on developed countries in the literature on the creation of the multilateral trading system portrays developing countries as a monolithic bloc and does not use non-English primary sources. It is argued that Brazil was far from being a free rider in tariff negotiations and the position the country had on this issue can be explained by domestic rather than international constraints. This period also shaped Brazil's belief about the international trade order, something that had great relevance in later periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07075332.2014.897248\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2014.897248\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2014.897248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brazil and the Origins of the Multilateral Trading System
This article examines Brazil's position in multilateral trade negotiations from 1946 to 1960. It is an original contribution, as the focus only on developed countries in the literature on the creation of the multilateral trading system portrays developing countries as a monolithic bloc and does not use non-English primary sources. It is argued that Brazil was far from being a free rider in tariff negotiations and the position the country had on this issue can be explained by domestic rather than international constraints. This period also shaped Brazil's belief about the international trade order, something that had great relevance in later periods.
期刊介绍:
The International History Review is the only English-language quarterly devoted entirely to the history of international relations and the history of international thought. Since 1979 the Review has established itself as one of the premier History journals in the world, read and regularly cited by both political scientists and historians. The Review serves as a bridge between historical research and the study of international relations. The Review publishes articles exploring the history of international relations and the history of international thought. The editors particularly welcome submissions that explore the history of current conflicts and conflicts of current interest; the development of international thought; diplomatic history.