昆提连:一位古典教育家谈到了写作过程

Janet W. Bloodgood
{"title":"昆提连:一位古典教育家谈到了写作过程","authors":"Janet W. Bloodgood","doi":"10.1080/19388070209558379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The impact of state‐mandated writing tests has altered process writing instruction practices in many elementary and middle school classrooms. Ancient Roman educational principles designed to produce the perfect orator and citizen have relevance to modern writing instruction and may cause us to rethink what is meant by “back to basics.” The views of Quintilian provide a new lens for examining the writing process and its components as advocated by Graves, Murray, and others. The Quintilian Progression contains guidelines to support teachers and students as they endeavor to become more effective writers and critical thinkers.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"30 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070209558379","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quintilian: A classical educator speaks to the writing process\",\"authors\":\"Janet W. Bloodgood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070209558379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The impact of state‐mandated writing tests has altered process writing instruction practices in many elementary and middle school classrooms. Ancient Roman educational principles designed to produce the perfect orator and citizen have relevance to modern writing instruction and may cause us to rethink what is meant by “back to basics.” The views of Quintilian provide a new lens for examining the writing process and its components as advocated by Graves, Murray, and others. The Quintilian Progression contains guidelines to support teachers and students as they endeavor to become more effective writers and critical thinkers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"30 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070209558379\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

国家强制写作测试的影响已经改变了许多小学和中学课堂上的写作教学实践。旨在培养完美演说家和公民的古罗马教育原则与现代写作教学相关,并可能促使我们重新思考“回归基本”的含义。昆提利安的观点为研究格雷夫斯、默里等人所倡导的写作过程及其组成部分提供了一个新的视角。昆提连进程包含指导方针,以支持教师和学生努力成为更有效的作家和批判性思想家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quintilian: A classical educator speaks to the writing process
Abstract The impact of state‐mandated writing tests has altered process writing instruction practices in many elementary and middle school classrooms. Ancient Roman educational principles designed to produce the perfect orator and citizen have relevance to modern writing instruction and may cause us to rethink what is meant by “back to basics.” The views of Quintilian provide a new lens for examining the writing process and its components as advocated by Graves, Murray, and others. The Quintilian Progression contains guidelines to support teachers and students as they endeavor to become more effective writers and critical thinkers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five-year Pan-European, longitudinal surveillance of Clostridium difficile ribotype prevalence and antimicrobial resistance: the extended ClosER study. Bringing television back to the bedroom: Transactions between a seventh grade struggling reader and her mathematics teacher “Kiss your brain”: A closer look at flourishing literacy gains in impoverished elementary schools “I talk them through it”: Teacher mediation of picturebooks with sparse verbal text during whole‐class readalouds Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK‐12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1