课堂拼写教学:历史、研究与实践

Bob Schlagal
{"title":"课堂拼写教学:历史、研究与实践","authors":"Bob Schlagal","doi":"10.1080/19388070209558380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Currently there is no consensus on how best to teach spelling in a classroom setting. This article discusses three major positions regarding spelling instruction: the incidental, the developmental word study, and the basal speller approaches. Implications of these positions for classroom teaching are explored. The author presents an overview of nearly a century of research into spelling instruction. In addition, he reviews contemporary research on instructional level in spelling and on addressing the needs of low achieving spellers in a classroom setting. This research perspective helps to clarify and perhaps even to resolve some of the contentious issues and points of debate in contemporary discussion and practice. In light of this, the author argues that a modified basal speller approach can provide classroom teachers with an efficient and adaptable tool that can meet a variety of needs, provided that students are placed in spelling books based on an assessment of their prior knowledge and not simply on their current grade level.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"44 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070209558380","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classroom spelling instruction: History, research, and practice\",\"authors\":\"Bob Schlagal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070209558380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Currently there is no consensus on how best to teach spelling in a classroom setting. This article discusses three major positions regarding spelling instruction: the incidental, the developmental word study, and the basal speller approaches. Implications of these positions for classroom teaching are explored. The author presents an overview of nearly a century of research into spelling instruction. In addition, he reviews contemporary research on instructional level in spelling and on addressing the needs of low achieving spellers in a classroom setting. This research perspective helps to clarify and perhaps even to resolve some of the contentious issues and points of debate in contemporary discussion and practice. In light of this, the author argues that a modified basal speller approach can provide classroom teachers with an efficient and adaptable tool that can meet a variety of needs, provided that students are placed in spelling books based on an assessment of their prior knowledge and not simply on their current grade level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070209558380\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

目前,关于如何在课堂上最好地教授拼写,还没有达成共识。本文讨论了关于拼写教学的三种主要观点:附带性、发展性词汇学习和基础拼写方法。探讨了这些立场对课堂教学的影响。作者概述了近一个世纪以来对拼写教学的研究。此外,他回顾了当代拼写教学水平的研究,以及如何在课堂上解决低水平拼写者的需求。这种研究视角有助于澄清甚至解决当代讨论和实践中一些有争议的问题和争论点。鉴于此,作者认为,一个改进的基础拼写方法可以为课堂教师提供一个有效的和适应性强的工具,可以满足各种需求,前提是根据学生先前的知识评估而不是简单地根据他们当前的年级水平来安排拼写书籍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classroom spelling instruction: History, research, and practice
Abstract Currently there is no consensus on how best to teach spelling in a classroom setting. This article discusses three major positions regarding spelling instruction: the incidental, the developmental word study, and the basal speller approaches. Implications of these positions for classroom teaching are explored. The author presents an overview of nearly a century of research into spelling instruction. In addition, he reviews contemporary research on instructional level in spelling and on addressing the needs of low achieving spellers in a classroom setting. This research perspective helps to clarify and perhaps even to resolve some of the contentious issues and points of debate in contemporary discussion and practice. In light of this, the author argues that a modified basal speller approach can provide classroom teachers with an efficient and adaptable tool that can meet a variety of needs, provided that students are placed in spelling books based on an assessment of their prior knowledge and not simply on their current grade level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five-year Pan-European, longitudinal surveillance of Clostridium difficile ribotype prevalence and antimicrobial resistance: the extended ClosER study. Bringing television back to the bedroom: Transactions between a seventh grade struggling reader and her mathematics teacher “Kiss your brain”: A closer look at flourishing literacy gains in impoverished elementary schools “I talk them through it”: Teacher mediation of picturebooks with sparse verbal text during whole‐class readalouds Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK‐12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1