内部康复:关于成瘾治疗的惊人真相-以及如何获得有效的帮助;《清洁:克服毒瘾,结束美国最大的悲剧》

Barney Straus
{"title":"内部康复:关于成瘾治疗的惊人真相-以及如何获得有效的帮助;《清洁:克服毒瘾,结束美国最大的悲剧》","authors":"Barney Straus","doi":"10.1080/1556035X.2014.967582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A pair of books that are sharply critical of the addiction treatment industry were released by the popular press in 2013. Clean by David Sheff (2013) and Inside Rehab by Anne M. Fletcher (2013) both address America’s addiction epidemic and its treatment. The two books complement each other in several ways. While Sheff presents a sweeping polemic aimed at reforming the way we think about and treat addiction, Fletcher offers a more dispassionate critique of the treatment landscape. As is so often the case for those interested in addiction, both authors were motivated to write about the subject, at least in part, by personal experience: Sheff through being the parent of an addict and Fletcher through her own struggles with alcohol. As Sheff captured so poignantly in his 2008 memoir Beautiful Boy, he is the father of a drug-addicted son. Although Fletcher discussed her own struggle with problematic drinking in her 2001 book Sober for Good, she leaves out her personal experience in Inside Rehab and rather maintains the perspective of an objective investigator. Perhaps this is because she never was “inside rehab” during her own recovery. Nevertheless, both she and Sheff offer equally critical descriptions of our current system of care for those struggling with addictive disorders. Both authors use clear, straightforward prose that reveals their anger toward current addiction policy and treatment in the United States. Sheff’s primary thesis is that addiction should move swiftly away from being seen as a legal issue toward one that ought to be addressed purely as a medical problem. While many treatment centers, as well as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), have long subscribed to the “disease model” of addiction treatment and in more recent years the National Institute on Drug Abuse has termed addiction a “brain disease,” Sheff does much to help us remove the quotation marks around the word disease. Fletcher, on the other hand, uses such quotation marks, signaling her own skepticism about the legitimacy of","PeriodicalId":88011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","volume":"9 1","pages":"328 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2014.967582","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inside Rehab: The Surprising Truth About Addiction Treatment-and How to Get Help That Works; and Clean: Overcoming Adiction and Ending America's Greatest Tragedy\",\"authors\":\"Barney Straus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1556035X.2014.967582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A pair of books that are sharply critical of the addiction treatment industry were released by the popular press in 2013. Clean by David Sheff (2013) and Inside Rehab by Anne M. Fletcher (2013) both address America’s addiction epidemic and its treatment. The two books complement each other in several ways. While Sheff presents a sweeping polemic aimed at reforming the way we think about and treat addiction, Fletcher offers a more dispassionate critique of the treatment landscape. As is so often the case for those interested in addiction, both authors were motivated to write about the subject, at least in part, by personal experience: Sheff through being the parent of an addict and Fletcher through her own struggles with alcohol. As Sheff captured so poignantly in his 2008 memoir Beautiful Boy, he is the father of a drug-addicted son. Although Fletcher discussed her own struggle with problematic drinking in her 2001 book Sober for Good, she leaves out her personal experience in Inside Rehab and rather maintains the perspective of an objective investigator. Perhaps this is because she never was “inside rehab” during her own recovery. Nevertheless, both she and Sheff offer equally critical descriptions of our current system of care for those struggling with addictive disorders. Both authors use clear, straightforward prose that reveals their anger toward current addiction policy and treatment in the United States. Sheff’s primary thesis is that addiction should move swiftly away from being seen as a legal issue toward one that ought to be addressed purely as a medical problem. While many treatment centers, as well as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), have long subscribed to the “disease model” of addiction treatment and in more recent years the National Institute on Drug Abuse has termed addiction a “brain disease,” Sheff does much to help us remove the quotation marks around the word disease. Fletcher, on the other hand, uses such quotation marks, signaling her own skepticism about the legitimacy of\",\"PeriodicalId\":88011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"328 - 332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2014.967582\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2014.967582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2014.967582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2013年,大众媒体出版了两本尖锐批评成瘾治疗行业的书。大卫·谢夫的《清洁》(2013)和安妮·m·弗莱彻的《内部康复》(2013)都探讨了美国的成瘾流行病及其治疗。这两本书在几个方面相辅相成。谢夫提出了一场旨在改革我们思考和治疗成瘾方式的全面论战,而弗莱彻则对治疗现状进行了更为冷静的批评。就像那些对成瘾感兴趣的人经常遇到的情况一样,两位作者都是出于个人经历而写作这个主题的,至少部分是出于个人经历:谢夫是一个瘾君子的父母,弗莱彻是她自己与酒精的斗争。正如谢夫在2008年出版的回忆录《美丽的男孩》(Beautiful Boy)中深刻描写的那样,他是一个吸毒成瘾儿子的父亲。虽然弗莱彻在她2001年出版的《永远清醒》一书中讨论了她自己与酗酒问题的斗争,但她在《内部康复》一书中没有提到她的个人经历,而是保持了一个客观调查者的视角。也许这是因为在她自己的康复过程中,她从来没有“进入康复中心”。尽管如此,她和谢夫都对我们目前对那些与成瘾障碍作斗争的人的护理体系进行了同样批判的描述。两位作者都用清晰、直白的文字表达了他们对美国当前成瘾政策和治疗的愤怒。谢夫的主要论点是,成瘾应该迅速从一个法律问题转变为一个纯粹的医学问题。虽然许多治疗中心,包括匿名戒酒会(AA),长期以来一直认同成瘾治疗的“疾病模式”,近年来,国家药物滥用研究所(National Institute on Drug Abuse)将成瘾称为“脑部疾病”,但谢夫做了很多工作,帮助我们去掉了“疾病”这个词的引号。弗莱彻,另一方面,使用这样的引号,表明她自己对合法性的怀疑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inside Rehab: The Surprising Truth About Addiction Treatment-and How to Get Help That Works; and Clean: Overcoming Adiction and Ending America's Greatest Tragedy
A pair of books that are sharply critical of the addiction treatment industry were released by the popular press in 2013. Clean by David Sheff (2013) and Inside Rehab by Anne M. Fletcher (2013) both address America’s addiction epidemic and its treatment. The two books complement each other in several ways. While Sheff presents a sweeping polemic aimed at reforming the way we think about and treat addiction, Fletcher offers a more dispassionate critique of the treatment landscape. As is so often the case for those interested in addiction, both authors were motivated to write about the subject, at least in part, by personal experience: Sheff through being the parent of an addict and Fletcher through her own struggles with alcohol. As Sheff captured so poignantly in his 2008 memoir Beautiful Boy, he is the father of a drug-addicted son. Although Fletcher discussed her own struggle with problematic drinking in her 2001 book Sober for Good, she leaves out her personal experience in Inside Rehab and rather maintains the perspective of an objective investigator. Perhaps this is because she never was “inside rehab” during her own recovery. Nevertheless, both she and Sheff offer equally critical descriptions of our current system of care for those struggling with addictive disorders. Both authors use clear, straightforward prose that reveals their anger toward current addiction policy and treatment in the United States. Sheff’s primary thesis is that addiction should move swiftly away from being seen as a legal issue toward one that ought to be addressed purely as a medical problem. While many treatment centers, as well as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), have long subscribed to the “disease model” of addiction treatment and in more recent years the National Institute on Drug Abuse has termed addiction a “brain disease,” Sheff does much to help us remove the quotation marks around the word disease. Fletcher, on the other hand, uses such quotation marks, signaling her own skepticism about the legitimacy of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility Study and Design of the ICU Infection Registry System for Patients Admitted to the Alzahra University Hospital in Isfahan: A Methodology Study. Is L-Glutamate Toxic to Neurons and Thereby Contributes to Neuronal Loss and Neurodegeneration? A Systematic Review. A Revised Multifamily Group Curriculum: The Need for Family Member Recovery from Addiction Rolling Psychodynamic Group for Cocaine Use Disorder: A Single-Group Study Using Multilevel Models The Window Opens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1