乳腺癌术后超声测量客观淋巴水肿的最佳压力

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Computer Assisted Surgery Pub Date : 2016-10-27 DOI:10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310
C. Lim, Byungkwan Hwang, Heejung Park, Do-Hong Lee, Jieun Park, Kyu Jin Lee, Sun Kwon Kim, K. Seo
{"title":"乳腺癌术后超声测量客观淋巴水肿的最佳压力","authors":"C. Lim, Byungkwan Hwang, Heejung Park, Do-Hong Lee, Jieun Park, Kyu Jin Lee, Sun Kwon Kim, K. Seo","doi":"10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To examine the reliability of ultrasonographic thickness and compressibility along with real-time pressure monitoring to evaluate postmastectomy lymphedema and to suggest a reference range of appropriate pressure. Design: Measurement reliability study. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Fifteen patients with prior mastectomy for breast cancer who were diagnosed with secondary lymphedema, and 16 healthy control subjects. Methods: The thickness and compressibility of the subcutaneous layer in the arms of 15 postmastectomy patients with secondary lymphedema were measured using B-mode and M-mode ultrasonography. An ultrasound machine was equipped with a real-time pressure-monitoring device to monitor downward compression pressure on the arms at a constant velocity. The ratio of thickness change defined the compressibility index. Two different experienced examiners participated in the measurement of lymphedema. Intrarater reliability and inter-rater reliability were estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Very good reliability was defined as an ICC of more than 0.8. Main outcome measurements: The thickness of the subcutaneous layer, the compressibility index, and the intrarater and inter-rater reliability were measured. Results: The measured thicknesses demonstrated very good intrarater and inter-rater reliability for the forearm and upper arm. For the compressibility index, the upper arm and forearm had very good intrarater and inter-rater reliability at over 2000 Pa of compression (>0.9). Conclusions: Ultrasonography with real-time pressure monitoring may be useful for evaluating the severity and characteristics of lymphedema, particularly at compression pressures more than 2000 Pa.","PeriodicalId":56051,"journal":{"name":"Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":"102 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal pressure for measuring objective lymphedema with postoperative ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"C. Lim, Byungkwan Hwang, Heejung Park, Do-Hong Lee, Jieun Park, Kyu Jin Lee, Sun Kwon Kim, K. Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: To examine the reliability of ultrasonographic thickness and compressibility along with real-time pressure monitoring to evaluate postmastectomy lymphedema and to suggest a reference range of appropriate pressure. Design: Measurement reliability study. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Fifteen patients with prior mastectomy for breast cancer who were diagnosed with secondary lymphedema, and 16 healthy control subjects. Methods: The thickness and compressibility of the subcutaneous layer in the arms of 15 postmastectomy patients with secondary lymphedema were measured using B-mode and M-mode ultrasonography. An ultrasound machine was equipped with a real-time pressure-monitoring device to monitor downward compression pressure on the arms at a constant velocity. The ratio of thickness change defined the compressibility index. Two different experienced examiners participated in the measurement of lymphedema. Intrarater reliability and inter-rater reliability were estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Very good reliability was defined as an ICC of more than 0.8. Main outcome measurements: The thickness of the subcutaneous layer, the compressibility index, and the intrarater and inter-rater reliability were measured. Results: The measured thicknesses demonstrated very good intrarater and inter-rater reliability for the forearm and upper arm. For the compressibility index, the upper arm and forearm had very good intrarater and inter-rater reliability at over 2000 Pa of compression (>0.9). Conclusions: Ultrasonography with real-time pressure monitoring may be useful for evaluating the severity and characteristics of lymphedema, particularly at compression pressures more than 2000 Pa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Assisted Surgery\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Assisted Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2016.1240310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要目的:探讨超声厚度和可压缩性结合实时压力监测评价乳腺切除术后淋巴水肿的可靠性,并提出合适的压力参考范围。设计:测量可靠性研究。环境:研究实验室。参与者:15名先前因乳腺癌切除并诊断为继发性淋巴水肿的患者和16名健康对照者。方法:对15例乳腺切除术后继发性淋巴水肿患者的手臂皮下层厚度和可压缩性进行b超和m超测量。在超声机上安装实时压力监测装置,以恒速监测手臂上的向下压缩压力。厚度变化的比值定义了压缩系数。两名不同的经验丰富的检查员参与了淋巴水肿的测量。用组内相关系数估计组内信度和组间信度。非常好的信度定义为ICC大于0.8。主要结果测量:测量皮下层厚度、可压缩性指数、肺内和肺间可靠性。结果:测量的前臂和上臂的厚度显示出非常好的内部和内部可靠性。在压缩指数方面,上臂和前臂在超过2000 Pa的压缩时具有非常好的内径和内径信度(>0.9)。结论:实时压力监测的超声检查可能有助于评估淋巴水肿的严重程度和特征,特别是在压缩压力超过2000 Pa时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal pressure for measuring objective lymphedema with postoperative ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer
Abstract Objective: To examine the reliability of ultrasonographic thickness and compressibility along with real-time pressure monitoring to evaluate postmastectomy lymphedema and to suggest a reference range of appropriate pressure. Design: Measurement reliability study. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Fifteen patients with prior mastectomy for breast cancer who were diagnosed with secondary lymphedema, and 16 healthy control subjects. Methods: The thickness and compressibility of the subcutaneous layer in the arms of 15 postmastectomy patients with secondary lymphedema were measured using B-mode and M-mode ultrasonography. An ultrasound machine was equipped with a real-time pressure-monitoring device to monitor downward compression pressure on the arms at a constant velocity. The ratio of thickness change defined the compressibility index. Two different experienced examiners participated in the measurement of lymphedema. Intrarater reliability and inter-rater reliability were estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Very good reliability was defined as an ICC of more than 0.8. Main outcome measurements: The thickness of the subcutaneous layer, the compressibility index, and the intrarater and inter-rater reliability were measured. Results: The measured thicknesses demonstrated very good intrarater and inter-rater reliability for the forearm and upper arm. For the compressibility index, the upper arm and forearm had very good intrarater and inter-rater reliability at over 2000 Pa of compression (>0.9). Conclusions: Ultrasonography with real-time pressure monitoring may be useful for evaluating the severity and characteristics of lymphedema, particularly at compression pressures more than 2000 Pa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Assisted Surgery
Computer Assisted Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: omputer Assisted Surgery aims to improve patient care by advancing the utilization of computers during treatment; to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with the integration of advanced digital technologies into surgical practice; to disseminate clinical and basic research relevant to stereotactic surgery, minimal access surgery, endoscopy, and surgical robotics; to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between engineers and physicians in developing new concepts and applications; to educate clinicians about the principles and techniques of computer assisted surgery and therapeutics; and to serve the international scientific community as a medium for the transfer of new information relating to theory, research, and practice in biomedical imaging and the surgical specialties. The scope of Computer Assisted Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotactic procedures, surgery guided by intraoperative ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, image guided focused irradiation, robotic surgery, and any therapeutic interventions performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-based 3D bone modelling in computer assisted orthopedic surgery - a review and future challenges. Augmented reality technology shortens aneurysm surgery learning curve for residents. Feasibility of proton dosimetry overriding planning CT with daily CBCT elaborated through generative artificial intelligence tools. SwinD-Net: a lightweight segmentation network for laparoscopic liver segmentation. Risk prediction and analysis of gallbladder polyps with deep neural network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1