马西利奥·菲西诺关于柏拉图《巴门尼德》的一些未发表的注释,《劳女士》,89,SUP, 71

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1086/JWCI24396008
Valerio Sanzotta
{"title":"马西利奥·菲西诺关于柏拉图《巴门尼德》的一些未发表的注释,《劳女士》,89,SUP, 71","authors":"Valerio Sanzotta","doi":"10.1086/JWCI24396008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I t is well established that Marsilio Ficino's already be found in his autograph notes account of Plato's Parmenides depends on on Proclus's Platonic Theology in Florence, the onto-theological reading of it endorsed Biblioteca Riccardiana MS 70 (folios ir by Proclus and other Neoplatonists. Already 4V), copied by Matthaeus Camariota; this in antiquity, this approach stood opposed manuscript contains Proclus's Platonic to that of Albinus and Alcinous, who both Theology, Elements of Theology and Elements held that the Parmenides should be interof Physics, as well as Ocellus Lucanus's preted as a logical treatise.1 It was Proclus's On the Nature of the Universe, which Ficino commentary on the dialogue which Ficino studied and probably translated before had on his desk, as his main source, while 1463.3 Moreover, in the argumentum to his working on his own full-scale commentary, translation of the dialogue, dedicated to written between 1492 and 1494 and Cosimo de' Medici before August 1464— published in 1496.2 The work was the fruit one of his earliest attempts at an interpre of Ficino's reflections on the Parmenides tation of the Parmenides—Ficino already over thirty years, developing from his early sides with the theological reading, stating reading of Proclus. References to the theothat Plato 'included the entirety of theology logical interpretation of the Parmenides can in the Parmenides' ('universam in Parmenide","PeriodicalId":45703,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","volume":"77 1","pages":"211 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Unpublished Notes by Marsilio Ficino on Plato's Parmenides In MS Laur. 89 SUP. 71\",\"authors\":\"Valerio Sanzotta\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/JWCI24396008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I t is well established that Marsilio Ficino's already be found in his autograph notes account of Plato's Parmenides depends on on Proclus's Platonic Theology in Florence, the onto-theological reading of it endorsed Biblioteca Riccardiana MS 70 (folios ir by Proclus and other Neoplatonists. Already 4V), copied by Matthaeus Camariota; this in antiquity, this approach stood opposed manuscript contains Proclus's Platonic to that of Albinus and Alcinous, who both Theology, Elements of Theology and Elements held that the Parmenides should be interof Physics, as well as Ocellus Lucanus's preted as a logical treatise.1 It was Proclus's On the Nature of the Universe, which Ficino commentary on the dialogue which Ficino studied and probably translated before had on his desk, as his main source, while 1463.3 Moreover, in the argumentum to his working on his own full-scale commentary, translation of the dialogue, dedicated to written between 1492 and 1494 and Cosimo de' Medici before August 1464— published in 1496.2 The work was the fruit one of his earliest attempts at an interpre of Ficino's reflections on the Parmenides tation of the Parmenides—Ficino already over thirty years, developing from his early sides with the theological reading, stating reading of Proclus. References to the theothat Plato 'included the entirety of theology logical interpretation of the Parmenides can in the Parmenides' ('universam in Parmenide\",\"PeriodicalId\":45703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"211 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI24396008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI24396008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

如果马尔西利奥·菲西诺在他的亲笔笔记中对柏拉图的巴门尼德的描述是根据普罗克劳斯在佛罗伦萨的柏拉图神学,对它的对神学的解读得到了普罗克劳斯和其他新柏拉图主义者的认可。已经4V),由马特乌斯·卡马里奥塔复制;在古代,这种方法是对立的,手稿中有普罗克劳斯的柏拉图论,有阿尔比努斯和阿尔奇诺斯的柏拉图论,他们的《神学》、《神学的要素》和《要素》都认为巴门尼德应该是物理学的中间部分,还有奥塞勒斯·卢坎努斯的逻辑论文这是普罗克劳斯的《论宇宙的本质》费西诺对对话的评论费西诺之前研究并可能翻译过的那本评论放在他的桌子上,作为他的主要资料,1463.3此外,在他自己对对话进行全面评论和翻译的论证中,写于1492年至1494年,科西莫·德·美第奇在1464年8月之前出版于1496.2年,这部作品是他最早尝试解释菲西诺对巴门尼德的思考的成果之一,菲西诺已经有30多年了,从他早期的神学阅读发展而来,陈述阅读《Proclus》。柏拉图在巴门尼德的《巴门尼德的宇宙》(universam in Parmenides)中包含了对巴门尼德能的全部神学逻辑解释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some Unpublished Notes by Marsilio Ficino on Plato's Parmenides In MS Laur. 89 SUP. 71
I t is well established that Marsilio Ficino's already be found in his autograph notes account of Plato's Parmenides depends on on Proclus's Platonic Theology in Florence, the onto-theological reading of it endorsed Biblioteca Riccardiana MS 70 (folios ir by Proclus and other Neoplatonists. Already 4V), copied by Matthaeus Camariota; this in antiquity, this approach stood opposed manuscript contains Proclus's Platonic to that of Albinus and Alcinous, who both Theology, Elements of Theology and Elements held that the Parmenides should be interof Physics, as well as Ocellus Lucanus's preted as a logical treatise.1 It was Proclus's On the Nature of the Universe, which Ficino commentary on the dialogue which Ficino studied and probably translated before had on his desk, as his main source, while 1463.3 Moreover, in the argumentum to his working on his own full-scale commentary, translation of the dialogue, dedicated to written between 1492 and 1494 and Cosimo de' Medici before August 1464— published in 1496.2 The work was the fruit one of his earliest attempts at an interpre of Ficino's reflections on the Parmenides tation of the Parmenides—Ficino already over thirty years, developing from his early sides with the theological reading, stating reading of Proclus. References to the theothat Plato 'included the entirety of theology logical interpretation of the Parmenides can in the Parmenides' ('universam in Parmenide
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Cardinal Nephews and Ottomans in Two Thesis Prints by Giovanni Luigi Valesio Identifying and Censoring Improper Artworks in Carlo Borromeo’s Diocese. The Sixteenth-Century Index of Profane Paintings in the Milan Diocesan Archives ‘A Spring of Immortal Colours’. Jacques Le Moyne de Morgues (c. 1533–1588) and Picturing Plants in the Sixteenth Century On the Spelling of ‘Author’ The Painted Fly and the Connoisseur in Eighteenth-Century British Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1