悬崖和沼泽中西洋土的生长和生理:变异是生境特有的还是地点特有的?

Botanical Gazette Pub Date : 1991-12-01 DOI:10.1086/337912
U. Matthes-Sears, D. Larson
{"title":"悬崖和沼泽中西洋土的生长和生理:变异是生境特有的还是地点特有的?","authors":"U. Matthes-Sears, D. Larson","doi":"10.1086/337912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine if patterns of growth and physiology of Thuja occidentalis differed between dry and wet habitats or were site specific within habitats, three cliff and three swamp populations in southern Ontario, Canada, were intensively investigated. The average annual increases in height, basal diameter, and estimated oven dry mass were determined for all trees in four 16 m2 quadrats per site. The net photosynthetic response to photosynthetically active radiation was measured in situ at each site and on potted cliff and swamp saplings kept in a mesic common garden. Possible environmental factors controlling growth, such as tissue nutrient levels and canopy shading, were also investigated. Significant differences were found among the six sites in all three measures of productivity, in the maximum net photosynthetic rate at light saturation (Pmax), in the foliar levels of N, P, Ca, and the N:P ratio, and in the degree of canopy shading. Variations in all these characteristics were site specific and independent of habitat type. Significant differences between cliffs and swamps were found only in the foliar levels of Mg (cliff > swamp). All foliar nutrient levels (with the possible exception of P at one cliff site) were above values considered limiting. Plants in the common garden had the same photosynthetic light response as their in situ counterparts. There was no correspondence among the site-specific patterns of productivity, Pmax, foliar nutrients, and canopy shading. It is concluded that the factors controlling the growth of T. occidentalis are site but not habitat specific. No evidence of ecotypic differentiation was found.","PeriodicalId":9213,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Gazette","volume":"152 1","pages":"500 - 508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth and Physiology of Thuja occidentalis L. from Cliffs and Swamps: Is Variation Habitat or Site Specific?\",\"authors\":\"U. Matthes-Sears, D. Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/337912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To determine if patterns of growth and physiology of Thuja occidentalis differed between dry and wet habitats or were site specific within habitats, three cliff and three swamp populations in southern Ontario, Canada, were intensively investigated. The average annual increases in height, basal diameter, and estimated oven dry mass were determined for all trees in four 16 m2 quadrats per site. The net photosynthetic response to photosynthetically active radiation was measured in situ at each site and on potted cliff and swamp saplings kept in a mesic common garden. Possible environmental factors controlling growth, such as tissue nutrient levels and canopy shading, were also investigated. Significant differences were found among the six sites in all three measures of productivity, in the maximum net photosynthetic rate at light saturation (Pmax), in the foliar levels of N, P, Ca, and the N:P ratio, and in the degree of canopy shading. Variations in all these characteristics were site specific and independent of habitat type. Significant differences between cliffs and swamps were found only in the foliar levels of Mg (cliff > swamp). All foliar nutrient levels (with the possible exception of P at one cliff site) were above values considered limiting. Plants in the common garden had the same photosynthetic light response as their in situ counterparts. There was no correspondence among the site-specific patterns of productivity, Pmax, foliar nutrients, and canopy shading. It is concluded that the factors controlling the growth of T. occidentalis are site but not habitat specific. No evidence of ecotypic differentiation was found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botanical Gazette\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"500 - 508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botanical Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/337912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/337912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

为了确定西部土加的生长和生理模式在干生境和湿生境之间是否存在差异,或者在生境内是否存在特定的地点,对加拿大安大略省南部的三个悬崖种群和三个沼泽种群进行了深入调查。在每个地点的4个16 m2样方中,测定了所有树木的年平均高度、基径和估计干质量。在每个地点和盆栽悬崖和沼泽幼树上原位测量了光合有效辐射的净光合响应。研究了控制生长的环境因素,如组织营养水平和冠层遮荫。6个样地的3个生产力指标、光饱和时最大净光合速率(Pmax)、叶片氮、磷、钙和氮磷比水平以及冠层遮阳程度均存在显著差异。所有这些特征的变化都是立地特有的,与生境类型无关。崖状沼泽与沼泽间仅在Mg (cliff > swamp)的叶片水平上存在显著差异。所有叶面养分水平(可能除了一个悬崖站点的磷)都高于被认为是极限的值。普通花园中的植物与原位植物具有相同的光合反应。生产力、Pmax、叶面养分和冠层遮荫在不同立地间没有对应关系。结果表明,控制西花蓟马生长的因素是场域的,而不是生境的。未发现生态型分化的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Growth and Physiology of Thuja occidentalis L. from Cliffs and Swamps: Is Variation Habitat or Site Specific?
To determine if patterns of growth and physiology of Thuja occidentalis differed between dry and wet habitats or were site specific within habitats, three cliff and three swamp populations in southern Ontario, Canada, were intensively investigated. The average annual increases in height, basal diameter, and estimated oven dry mass were determined for all trees in four 16 m2 quadrats per site. The net photosynthetic response to photosynthetically active radiation was measured in situ at each site and on potted cliff and swamp saplings kept in a mesic common garden. Possible environmental factors controlling growth, such as tissue nutrient levels and canopy shading, were also investigated. Significant differences were found among the six sites in all three measures of productivity, in the maximum net photosynthetic rate at light saturation (Pmax), in the foliar levels of N, P, Ca, and the N:P ratio, and in the degree of canopy shading. Variations in all these characteristics were site specific and independent of habitat type. Significant differences between cliffs and swamps were found only in the foliar levels of Mg (cliff > swamp). All foliar nutrient levels (with the possible exception of P at one cliff site) were above values considered limiting. Plants in the common garden had the same photosynthetic light response as their in situ counterparts. There was no correspondence among the site-specific patterns of productivity, Pmax, foliar nutrients, and canopy shading. It is concluded that the factors controlling the growth of T. occidentalis are site but not habitat specific. No evidence of ecotypic differentiation was found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FoxP3 recognizes microsatellites and bridges DNA through multimerization. Understanding the Link between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS Stigmas. National epidemiological analysis of the association of COVID-19 vaccination and incidence of COVID-19 cases in Canada, January to August 2021. Utility of a fulcrum for positioning support during flexion-extension radiographs for assessment of lumbar instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eucalyptus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1