特定食物气味的正鼻和后鼻刺激:快感和熟悉度评级与化学感觉愉悦量表(CPS)得分有关

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Flavour and Fragrance Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1002/ffj.3743
Charlotte Bontempi, Pauline Corbelin, Gérard Brand, Laurence Jacquot
{"title":"特定食物气味的正鼻和后鼻刺激:快感和熟悉度评级与化学感觉愉悦量表(CPS)得分有关","authors":"Charlotte Bontempi,&nbsp;Pauline Corbelin,&nbsp;Gérard Brand,&nbsp;Laurence Jacquot","doi":"10.1002/ffj.3743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Volatile compounds can reach olfactory epithelium though the nose (orthonasal olfaction) or the mouth (retronasal olfaction). Although differences have been found between these two pathways in terms of odour sensitivity and identification, few studies have examined ortho- and retronasal differences taking into consideration the three main dimensions of olfactory perception (i.e. hedonicity, intensity and familiarity). Olfactory perception, and particularly odour hedonic perception, is influenced by several factors such as sex or age. Another variability factor worth considering, especially regarding food-related odours, is the ability to experience pleasure simulated by smell or taste, which can be measured with the Chemosensory Pleasure Scale (CPS). Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to compare odour sensory ratings in response to ortho- and retronasal presentation and (2) to examine the relationship between CPS scores and odour sensory ratings in ortho- and retronasal pathways. Participants rated ten food odours in ortho- and retronasal conditions using visual analogue scales and were divided into two subgroups based on the median CPS score (CPS+ and CPS− groups). Results revealed similar sensory responses to food odours between ortho- and retronasal pathways for the three main dimensions of olfactory perception. Interestingly, when CPS scores were considered, clear differences in odour familiarity and hedonicity were shown, particularly for the retronasal pathway (i.e. odours were perceived as more pleasant and more familiar in CPS+ group than in CPS− group). Overall, these findings suggest that differences in odour perception between ortho-and retronasal pathways may be related to specific individual characteristics such as chemosensory hedonic capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":170,"journal":{"name":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","volume":"38 4","pages":"243-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ortho- and Retronasal stimulations with specific food odours: Hedonic and familiarity ratings are related to chemosensory pleasure scale (CPS) scores\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Bontempi,&nbsp;Pauline Corbelin,&nbsp;Gérard Brand,&nbsp;Laurence Jacquot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ffj.3743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Volatile compounds can reach olfactory epithelium though the nose (orthonasal olfaction) or the mouth (retronasal olfaction). Although differences have been found between these two pathways in terms of odour sensitivity and identification, few studies have examined ortho- and retronasal differences taking into consideration the three main dimensions of olfactory perception (i.e. hedonicity, intensity and familiarity). Olfactory perception, and particularly odour hedonic perception, is influenced by several factors such as sex or age. Another variability factor worth considering, especially regarding food-related odours, is the ability to experience pleasure simulated by smell or taste, which can be measured with the Chemosensory Pleasure Scale (CPS). Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to compare odour sensory ratings in response to ortho- and retronasal presentation and (2) to examine the relationship between CPS scores and odour sensory ratings in ortho- and retronasal pathways. Participants rated ten food odours in ortho- and retronasal conditions using visual analogue scales and were divided into two subgroups based on the median CPS score (CPS+ and CPS− groups). Results revealed similar sensory responses to food odours between ortho- and retronasal pathways for the three main dimensions of olfactory perception. Interestingly, when CPS scores were considered, clear differences in odour familiarity and hedonicity were shown, particularly for the retronasal pathway (i.e. odours were perceived as more pleasant and more familiar in CPS+ group than in CPS− group). Overall, these findings suggest that differences in odour perception between ortho-and retronasal pathways may be related to specific individual characteristics such as chemosensory hedonic capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flavour and Fragrance Journal\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"243-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flavour and Fragrance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffj.3743\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffj.3743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

挥发性化合物可通过鼻(正鼻嗅觉)或口(后鼻嗅觉)到达嗅觉上皮。尽管在气味敏感性和识别方面发现了这两种途径之间的差异,但考虑到嗅觉感知的三个主要维度(即享乐性、强度和熟悉度),很少有研究考察了正鼻和后鼻的差异。嗅觉感知,尤其是气味享乐感知,受到性别或年龄等多种因素的影响。另一个值得考虑的可变性因素,特别是与食物有关的气味,是由嗅觉或味觉模拟的体验快乐的能力,这可以用化学感官快乐量表(CPS)来衡量。因此,本研究的目的是:(1)比较嗅觉感官评分对正鼻和后鼻表现的反应;(2)检查CPS评分与嗅觉感官评分在正鼻和后鼻通路之间的关系。参与者使用视觉模拟量表对正鼻和后鼻条件下的十种食物气味进行评分,并根据CPS评分中位数分为两个亚组(CPS+和CPS -组)。结果显示,在嗅觉感知的三个主要维度上,正鼻和后鼻通路对食物气味的感觉反应相似。有趣的是,当考虑CPS分数时,在气味熟悉度和享乐性方面表现出明显的差异,特别是对于后鼻通路(即CPS+组的气味被认为比CPS -组更令人愉快和熟悉)。总的来说,这些发现表明,正鼻和后鼻通道之间气味感知的差异可能与特定的个体特征有关,如化学感觉享乐能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ortho- and Retronasal stimulations with specific food odours: Hedonic and familiarity ratings are related to chemosensory pleasure scale (CPS) scores

Volatile compounds can reach olfactory epithelium though the nose (orthonasal olfaction) or the mouth (retronasal olfaction). Although differences have been found between these two pathways in terms of odour sensitivity and identification, few studies have examined ortho- and retronasal differences taking into consideration the three main dimensions of olfactory perception (i.e. hedonicity, intensity and familiarity). Olfactory perception, and particularly odour hedonic perception, is influenced by several factors such as sex or age. Another variability factor worth considering, especially regarding food-related odours, is the ability to experience pleasure simulated by smell or taste, which can be measured with the Chemosensory Pleasure Scale (CPS). Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to compare odour sensory ratings in response to ortho- and retronasal presentation and (2) to examine the relationship between CPS scores and odour sensory ratings in ortho- and retronasal pathways. Participants rated ten food odours in ortho- and retronasal conditions using visual analogue scales and were divided into two subgroups based on the median CPS score (CPS+ and CPS− groups). Results revealed similar sensory responses to food odours between ortho- and retronasal pathways for the three main dimensions of olfactory perception. Interestingly, when CPS scores were considered, clear differences in odour familiarity and hedonicity were shown, particularly for the retronasal pathway (i.e. odours were perceived as more pleasant and more familiar in CPS+ group than in CPS− group). Overall, these findings suggest that differences in odour perception between ortho-and retronasal pathways may be related to specific individual characteristics such as chemosensory hedonic capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Flavour and Fragrance Journal
Flavour and Fragrance Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Flavour and Fragrance Journal publishes original research articles, reviews and special reports on all aspects of flavour and fragrance. Its high scientific standards and international character is ensured by a strict refereeing system and an editorial team representing the multidisciplinary expertise of our field of research. Because analysis is the matter of many submissions and supports the data used in many other domains, a special attention is placed on the quality of analytical techniques. All natural or synthetic products eliciting or influencing a sensory stimulus related to gustation or olfaction are eligible for publication in the Journal. Eligible as well are the techniques related to their preparation, characterization and safety. This notably involves analytical and sensory analysis, physical chemistry, modeling, microbiology – antimicrobial properties, biology, chemosensory perception and legislation. The overall aim is to produce a journal of the highest quality which provides a scientific forum for academia as well as for industry on all aspects of flavors, fragrances and related materials, and which is valued by readers and contributors alike.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Evolution of Sensory Science: Expanding the Frontiers of the Flavour and Fragrance Journal Quality by Design Perspectives for Designing Delivery System for Flavour and Fragrance: Current State-of-the-Art and for Future Exploration Unveiling the Neurocognitive Impact of Food Aroma Molecules on Pleasantness Perception: Insights From EEG and Key Brain LFT Activation Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1