《玛丽亚姆的悲剧》中的戏剧与空间政治

Q3 Arts and Humanities Renaissance Drama Pub Date : 2016-03-01 DOI:10.1086/685787
M. Dowd
{"title":"《玛丽亚姆的悲剧》中的戏剧与空间政治","authors":"M. Dowd","doi":"10.1086/685787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"e lizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam (1613) has long been noted for its elusive dramatic structure: it is a play that evades any clear sense of distinction between stage and closet, public and private, theatrical and untheatrical. On the one hand, Mariam is categorized as a closet drama—a term that has itself been subject to a great deal of critical scrutiny—and, as such, it has often been understood as primarily a reading text and, thus, as untheatrical, self-consciously removed from the life of the public theaters. On the other hand, as Jonas Barish noted over two decades ago, this is not quite the entire story. Compared with contemporary closet plays by Fulke Greville, Samuel Daniel, and others, Mariam “in both its plotting and its language . . . approximates most closely the plays of the public theatre.” Barish, indeed, calls the play an “oddity” within the closet drama tradition. More recently, critics have developed and extended Barish’s insight by drawing attention to the ways in","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"44 1","pages":"101 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/685787","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dramaturgy and the Politics of Space in The Tragedy of Mariam\",\"authors\":\"M. Dowd\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/685787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"e lizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam (1613) has long been noted for its elusive dramatic structure: it is a play that evades any clear sense of distinction between stage and closet, public and private, theatrical and untheatrical. On the one hand, Mariam is categorized as a closet drama—a term that has itself been subject to a great deal of critical scrutiny—and, as such, it has often been understood as primarily a reading text and, thus, as untheatrical, self-consciously removed from the life of the public theaters. On the other hand, as Jonas Barish noted over two decades ago, this is not quite the entire story. Compared with contemporary closet plays by Fulke Greville, Samuel Daniel, and others, Mariam “in both its plotting and its language . . . approximates most closely the plays of the public theatre.” Barish, indeed, calls the play an “oddity” within the closet drama tradition. More recently, critics have developed and extended Barish’s insight by drawing attention to the ways in\",\"PeriodicalId\":53676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renaissance Drama\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/685787\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renaissance Drama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/685787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/685787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

伊丽莎白·卡里的《玛丽亚姆悲剧》(1613)一直以其难以捉摸的戏剧结构而闻名:这部戏剧回避了舞台与密室、公共与私人、戏剧与非戏剧之间的任何明确区分。一方面,《玛丽亚姆》被归类为一部不为人知的戏剧——这个词本身就受到了大量批评性的审视——因此,它通常被理解为主要是一种阅读文本,因此,它是非戏剧的,自觉地从公共剧院的生活中移除。另一方面,正如乔纳斯·巴里什(Jonas Barish)在20多年前指出的那样,这并不是事情的全部。与富尔克·格雷维尔、塞缪尔·丹尼尔等同时代的壁橱剧相比,《玛丽亚姆》“在情节和语言上……最接近于公共剧院的戏剧。”事实上,巴里什称这部剧是壁橱戏剧传统中的“异类”。最近,评论家们通过吸引人们注意进入的方式,发展并扩展了巴里什的见解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dramaturgy and the Politics of Space in The Tragedy of Mariam
e lizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam (1613) has long been noted for its elusive dramatic structure: it is a play that evades any clear sense of distinction between stage and closet, public and private, theatrical and untheatrical. On the one hand, Mariam is categorized as a closet drama—a term that has itself been subject to a great deal of critical scrutiny—and, as such, it has often been understood as primarily a reading text and, thus, as untheatrical, self-consciously removed from the life of the public theaters. On the other hand, as Jonas Barish noted over two decades ago, this is not quite the entire story. Compared with contemporary closet plays by Fulke Greville, Samuel Daniel, and others, Mariam “in both its plotting and its language . . . approximates most closely the plays of the public theatre.” Barish, indeed, calls the play an “oddity” within the closet drama tradition. More recently, critics have developed and extended Barish’s insight by drawing attention to the ways in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Drama
Renaissance Drama Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Cosmic Conversion and Timon’s Block Affective Ecologies: Afterword Female Masquers and Ambiguity in Timon of Athens Imaginary Puissance: Historicizing “Setting” and Discourses of Control Tamburlaine, Able-Bodiedness, and the Skills of the Early Modern Player
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1