河流和沿海洪水模型的最新进展和新领域

IF 25.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Reviews of Geophysics Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1029/2022RG000788
Keighobad Jafarzadegan, Hamid Moradkhani, Florian Pappenberger, Hamed Moftakhari, Paul Bates, Peyman Abbaszadeh, Reza Marsooli, Celso Ferreira, Hannah L. Cloke, Fred Ogden, Qingyun Duan
{"title":"河流和沿海洪水模型的最新进展和新领域","authors":"Keighobad Jafarzadegan,&nbsp;Hamid Moradkhani,&nbsp;Florian Pappenberger,&nbsp;Hamed Moftakhari,&nbsp;Paul Bates,&nbsp;Peyman Abbaszadeh,&nbsp;Reza Marsooli,&nbsp;Celso Ferreira,&nbsp;Hannah L. Cloke,&nbsp;Fred Ogden,&nbsp;Qingyun Duan","doi":"10.1029/2022RG000788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decades, the scientific community has made significant efforts to simulate flooding conditions using a variety of complex physically based models. Despite all advances, these models still fall short in accuracy and reliability and are often considered computationally intensive to be fully operational. This could be attributed to insufficient comprehension of the causative mechanisms of flood processes, assumptions in model development and inadequate consideration of uncertainties. We suggest adopting an approach that accounts for the influence of human activities, soil saturation, snow processes, topography, river morphology, and land-use type to enhance our understanding of flood generating mechanisms. We also recommend a transition to the development of innovative earth system modeling frameworks where the interaction among all components of the earth system are simultaneously modeled. Additionally, more nonselective and rigorous studies should be conducted to provide a detailed comparison of physical models and simplified methods for flood inundation mapping. Linking process-based models with data-driven/statistical methods offers a variety of opportunities that are yet to be explored and conveyed to researchers and emergency managers. The main contribution of this paper is to notify scientists and practitioners of the latest developments in flood characterization and modeling, identify challenges in understanding flood processes, associated uncertainties and risks in coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling for forecasting and inundation mapping, and the potential use of state-of-the-art data assimilation and machine learning to tackle the complexities involved in transitioning such developments to operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2022RG000788","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Riverine and Coastal Flood Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Keighobad Jafarzadegan,&nbsp;Hamid Moradkhani,&nbsp;Florian Pappenberger,&nbsp;Hamed Moftakhari,&nbsp;Paul Bates,&nbsp;Peyman Abbaszadeh,&nbsp;Reza Marsooli,&nbsp;Celso Ferreira,&nbsp;Hannah L. Cloke,&nbsp;Fred Ogden,&nbsp;Qingyun Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2022RG000788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past decades, the scientific community has made significant efforts to simulate flooding conditions using a variety of complex physically based models. Despite all advances, these models still fall short in accuracy and reliability and are often considered computationally intensive to be fully operational. This could be attributed to insufficient comprehension of the causative mechanisms of flood processes, assumptions in model development and inadequate consideration of uncertainties. We suggest adopting an approach that accounts for the influence of human activities, soil saturation, snow processes, topography, river morphology, and land-use type to enhance our understanding of flood generating mechanisms. We also recommend a transition to the development of innovative earth system modeling frameworks where the interaction among all components of the earth system are simultaneously modeled. Additionally, more nonselective and rigorous studies should be conducted to provide a detailed comparison of physical models and simplified methods for flood inundation mapping. Linking process-based models with data-driven/statistical methods offers a variety of opportunities that are yet to be explored and conveyed to researchers and emergency managers. The main contribution of this paper is to notify scientists and practitioners of the latest developments in flood characterization and modeling, identify challenges in understanding flood processes, associated uncertainties and risks in coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling for forecasting and inundation mapping, and the potential use of state-of-the-art data assimilation and machine learning to tackle the complexities involved in transitioning such developments to operation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews of Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"61 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2022RG000788\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews of Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022RG000788\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022RG000788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的几十年里,科学界已经做出了巨大的努力,使用各种复杂的基于物理的模型来模拟洪水条件。尽管有了这些进步,但这些模型在准确性和可靠性方面仍然不足,并且通常被认为是计算密集型的,无法完全运行。这可归因于对洪水过程的成因机制理解不足、模型开发中的假设和对不确定性考虑不足。我们建议采用一种考虑人类活动、土壤饱和度、积雪过程、地形、河流形态和土地利用类型影响的方法来提高我们对洪水产生机制的理解。我们还建议过渡到开发创新的地球系统建模框架,其中地球系统所有组件之间的相互作用同时建模。此外,应进行更多的非选择性和严格的研究,以提供洪水淹没制图的物理模型和简化方法的详细比较。将基于过程的模型与数据驱动/统计方法联系起来提供了各种机会,这些机会尚待探索并传达给研究人员和应急管理人员。本文的主要贡献是通知科学家和实践者洪水表征和建模的最新发展,确定理解洪水过程的挑战,预测和洪水制图中耦合水文和水动力建模的相关不确定性和风险,以及最先进的数据同化和机器学习的潜在应用,以解决将这些发展转变为操作所涉及的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Riverine and Coastal Flood Modeling

Over the past decades, the scientific community has made significant efforts to simulate flooding conditions using a variety of complex physically based models. Despite all advances, these models still fall short in accuracy and reliability and are often considered computationally intensive to be fully operational. This could be attributed to insufficient comprehension of the causative mechanisms of flood processes, assumptions in model development and inadequate consideration of uncertainties. We suggest adopting an approach that accounts for the influence of human activities, soil saturation, snow processes, topography, river morphology, and land-use type to enhance our understanding of flood generating mechanisms. We also recommend a transition to the development of innovative earth system modeling frameworks where the interaction among all components of the earth system are simultaneously modeled. Additionally, more nonselective and rigorous studies should be conducted to provide a detailed comparison of physical models and simplified methods for flood inundation mapping. Linking process-based models with data-driven/statistical methods offers a variety of opportunities that are yet to be explored and conveyed to researchers and emergency managers. The main contribution of this paper is to notify scientists and practitioners of the latest developments in flood characterization and modeling, identify challenges in understanding flood processes, associated uncertainties and risks in coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling for forecasting and inundation mapping, and the potential use of state-of-the-art data assimilation and machine learning to tackle the complexities involved in transitioning such developments to operation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews of Geophysics
Reviews of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics Reviews (ROG) offers comprehensive overviews and syntheses of current research across various domains of the Earth and space sciences. Our goal is to present accessible and engaging reviews that cater to the diverse AGU community. While authorship is typically by invitation, we warmly encourage readers and potential authors to share their suggestions with our editors.
期刊最新文献
Carbon Mineralization in Fractured Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review Global Land Subsidence: Impact of Climate Extremes and Human Activities Dynamics, Monitoring, and Forecasting of Tephra in the Atmosphere Age of Stratospheric Air: Progress on Processes, Observations, and Long-Term Trends Managing Induced Seismicity Risks From Enhanced Geothermal Systems: A Good Practice Guideline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1