{"title":"走向规范:自然权利在宪法裁判中的作用","authors":"Randy E. Barnett","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are in the midst of a natural law revival. Not since the Hart-Fuller debate2 in the wake of Nuremberg has legal academia witnessed such interest in the topics of natural law and natural rights.3 While this development may be only the most recent aspect of the now several decades old revival of normative legal philosophy that I chronicled some ten years ago,4 the immediate cause of this interest was, of course, the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. The","PeriodicalId":81001,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional commentary","volume":"12 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting Normative: The Role of Natural Rights in Constitutional Adjudication\",\"authors\":\"Randy E. Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are in the midst of a natural law revival. Not since the Hart-Fuller debate2 in the wake of Nuremberg has legal academia witnessed such interest in the topics of natural law and natural rights.3 While this development may be only the most recent aspect of the now several decades old revival of normative legal philosophy that I chronicled some ten years ago,4 the immediate cause of this interest was, of course, the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. The\",\"PeriodicalId\":81001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional commentary\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional commentary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Getting Normative: The Role of Natural Rights in Constitutional Adjudication
We are in the midst of a natural law revival. Not since the Hart-Fuller debate2 in the wake of Nuremberg has legal academia witnessed such interest in the topics of natural law and natural rights.3 While this development may be only the most recent aspect of the now several decades old revival of normative legal philosophy that I chronicled some ten years ago,4 the immediate cause of this interest was, of course, the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. The
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
