农村医疗保险优势市场动态和质量:历史背景和当前影响。

Q2 Medicine Rural policy brief Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033
Leah M Kemper, A. Barker, Lyndsey Wilber, T. McBride, K. Mueller
{"title":"农村医疗保险优势市场动态和质量:历史背景和当前影响。","authors":"Leah M Kemper, A. Barker, Lyndsey Wilber, T. McBride, K. Mueller","doi":"10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. In this policy brief, we assess variation in Medicare’s star quality ratings of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans that are available to rural beneficiaries. Evidence from the recent Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) quality demonstration suggests that market dynamics, i.e., firms entering and exiting the MA marketplace, play a role in quality improvement. Therefore, we also discuss how market dynamics may impact the smaller and less wealthy populations that are characteristic of rural places. Key Data Findings. (1) Highly rated MA plans serving rural Medicare beneficiaries are more likely to be health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and local preferred provider organizations (PPOs), as opposed to regional PPOs. HMOs and local PPOs may be better able to improve their quality scores strategically in response to the bonus payment incentive due to existing internal monitoring mechanisms. (2) On average, the rural enrollment rate is lower in plans with higher quality scores (59 percent) than the corresponding urban rate (71 percent). This differential is likely due, in part, to lack of availability of highly rated plans in rural areas: 17.8 percent of rural counties lacked access to a plan with four or more (out of five) stars, while just 3.7 percent of urban counties lacked such access. (3) MA plans with high quality scores have been operating longer, on average, and have a lower percentage of rural counties within their contract service areas than plans with lower quality scores.","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":"2016 3 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural Medicare Advantage Market Dynamics and Quality: Historical Context and Current Implications.\",\"authors\":\"Leah M Kemper, A. Barker, Lyndsey Wilber, T. McBride, K. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. In this policy brief, we assess variation in Medicare’s star quality ratings of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans that are available to rural beneficiaries. Evidence from the recent Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) quality demonstration suggests that market dynamics, i.e., firms entering and exiting the MA marketplace, play a role in quality improvement. Therefore, we also discuss how market dynamics may impact the smaller and less wealthy populations that are characteristic of rural places. Key Data Findings. (1) Highly rated MA plans serving rural Medicare beneficiaries are more likely to be health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and local preferred provider organizations (PPOs), as opposed to regional PPOs. HMOs and local PPOs may be better able to improve their quality scores strategically in response to the bonus payment incentive due to existing internal monitoring mechanisms. (2) On average, the rural enrollment rate is lower in plans with higher quality scores (59 percent) than the corresponding urban rate (71 percent). This differential is likely due, in part, to lack of availability of highly rated plans in rural areas: 17.8 percent of rural counties lacked access to a plan with four or more (out of five) stars, while just 3.7 percent of urban counties lacked such access. (3) MA plans with high quality scores have been operating longer, on average, and have a lower percentage of rural counties within their contract service areas than plans with lower quality scores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural policy brief\",\"volume\":\"2016 3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural policy brief\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural policy brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONI/IGX004.3033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的。在本政策简报中,我们评估了农村受益人可获得的医疗保险优势(MA)计划的医疗保险星级质量评级的变化。来自最近医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)质量论证的证据表明,市场动态,即企业进入和退出医疗保险市场,在质量改进中发挥了作用。因此,我们还讨论了市场动态如何影响农村地区特征的较小和较不富裕的人口。关键数据发现。(1)服务于农村医疗保险受益人的高评价MA计划更有可能是健康维护组织(HMOs)和当地首选提供者组织(PPOs),而不是区域PPOs。由于现有的内部监控机制,hmo和地方PPOs可以更好地应对奖金激励,从战略上提高质量分数。(2)平均而言,高质量分数计划的农村入学率(59%)低于相应的城市入学率(71%)。这种差异的部分原因可能是农村地区缺乏高评级计划的可用性:17.8%的农村县无法获得四星或以上(五星)的计划,而只有3.7%的城市县无法获得这样的计划。(3)质量分数高的MA计划平均运行时间更长,其合同服务区域内农村县的比例低于质量分数低的MA计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural Medicare Advantage Market Dynamics and Quality: Historical Context and Current Implications.
Purpose. In this policy brief, we assess variation in Medicare’s star quality ratings of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans that are available to rural beneficiaries. Evidence from the recent Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) quality demonstration suggests that market dynamics, i.e., firms entering and exiting the MA marketplace, play a role in quality improvement. Therefore, we also discuss how market dynamics may impact the smaller and less wealthy populations that are characteristic of rural places. Key Data Findings. (1) Highly rated MA plans serving rural Medicare beneficiaries are more likely to be health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and local preferred provider organizations (PPOs), as opposed to regional PPOs. HMOs and local PPOs may be better able to improve their quality scores strategically in response to the bonus payment incentive due to existing internal monitoring mechanisms. (2) On average, the rural enrollment rate is lower in plans with higher quality scores (59 percent) than the corresponding urban rate (71 percent). This differential is likely due, in part, to lack of availability of highly rated plans in rural areas: 17.8 percent of rural counties lacked access to a plan with four or more (out of five) stars, while just 3.7 percent of urban counties lacked such access. (3) MA plans with high quality scores have been operating longer, on average, and have a lower percentage of rural counties within their contract service areas than plans with lower quality scores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural policy brief
Rural policy brief Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Rural and Urban Medicare Advantage Beneficiary Characteristics. Changes to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System Pertinent to Small and Rural Practices, 2018. Trends in Hospital System Affiliation, 2007-2016. Health Insurance Marketplaces: Issuer Participation and Premium Trends in Rural Places, 2018. Spread of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations in Rural America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1