从所有权、知情同意和团结的角度看脐带血银行的伦理

E. Salvaterra, L. Lecchi, Sarah Gobbi, P. Rebulla
{"title":"从所有权、知情同意和团结的角度看脐带血银行的伦理","authors":"E. Salvaterra, L. Lecchi, Sarah Gobbi, P. Rebulla","doi":"10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Umbilical cord blood banking raises several issues in legal and ethical terms, from the determination of ownership of biological material to the respect of the right of self determination–namely, the right to give an informed consent–of the individuals involved (newborn, parents), to the commercialization of cord blood banks and to the related autologous use of donated placental blood. Recently these issues have been considered by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (EGE) in the Opinion on “Ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking” (Opinion No. 19 of 16 March 2004). They have also been part of a wide and intense international debate. This paper aims at examining these themes–ownership, informed consent, and commercialization of cord blood banking–with particular regard to the EGE Opinion on the ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking. Such opinion focuses on private cord blood banks for autologous use and underlines the legitimacy conditio...","PeriodicalId":51233,"journal":{"name":"Cell Preservation Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethics of Cord Blood Banking in Light of Ownership, Informed Consent, and Solidarity\",\"authors\":\"E. Salvaterra, L. Lecchi, Sarah Gobbi, P. Rebulla\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Umbilical cord blood banking raises several issues in legal and ethical terms, from the determination of ownership of biological material to the respect of the right of self determination–namely, the right to give an informed consent–of the individuals involved (newborn, parents), to the commercialization of cord blood banks and to the related autologous use of donated placental blood. Recently these issues have been considered by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (EGE) in the Opinion on “Ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking” (Opinion No. 19 of 16 March 2004). They have also been part of a wide and intense international debate. This paper aims at examining these themes–ownership, informed consent, and commercialization of cord blood banking–with particular regard to the EGE Opinion on the ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking. Such opinion focuses on private cord blood banks for autologous use and underlines the legitimacy conditio...\",\"PeriodicalId\":51233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Preservation Technology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"91-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Preservation Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Preservation Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/CPT.2006.4.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

脐带血银行在法律和伦理方面提出了几个问题,从确定生物材料的所有权到尊重自我决定的权利,即给予相关个人(新生儿、父母)知情同意的权利,到脐带血银行的商业化以及捐赠的胎盘血的相关自体使用。最近,欧洲科学和新技术伦理小组在关于“脐带血银行的伦理问题”的意见(2004年3月16日第19号意见)中向欧洲委员会审议了这些问题。它们也成为广泛而激烈的国际辩论的一部分。本文旨在研究这些主题——所有权、知情同意和脐带血库的商业化——特别是关于脐带血库伦理方面的EGE意见。这种意见侧重于用于自体使用的私人脐带血银行,并强调了其合法性条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ethics of Cord Blood Banking in Light of Ownership, Informed Consent, and Solidarity
Umbilical cord blood banking raises several issues in legal and ethical terms, from the determination of ownership of biological material to the respect of the right of self determination–namely, the right to give an informed consent–of the individuals involved (newborn, parents), to the commercialization of cord blood banks and to the related autologous use of donated placental blood. Recently these issues have been considered by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (EGE) in the Opinion on “Ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking” (Opinion No. 19 of 16 March 2004). They have also been part of a wide and intense international debate. This paper aims at examining these themes–ownership, informed consent, and commercialization of cord blood banking–with particular regard to the EGE Opinion on the ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood banking. Such opinion focuses on private cord blood banks for autologous use and underlines the legitimacy conditio...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Preservation at Room Temperature of Freeze-Dried Human Tumor Samples Dedicated to Nucleic Acids Analyses Glycine Protects Bile Physiology and Biliary-Specific Liver Cell Metabolism from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A 1H NMR Study Artificial Collapse of Blastocysts Before Vitrification: Mechanical vs. Laser Technique and Effect on Survival, Cell Number, and Cell Death in Early and Expanded Blastocysts Effect of Liposome Charge and Composition on the Delivery of Trehalose into Red Blood Cells Room Temperature Storage of Cultured Human Articular Chondrocytes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1