{"title":"改善缅因州北部以山毛榉为主的北方阔叶林林下组成","authors":"A. Nelson, R. Wagner","doi":"10.1093/NJAF/28.4.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"regeneration and pole-sized beech densities (Jones et al. 1989, Bohn and Nyland 2003, Nolet et al. 2008), but with larger gap/patch openings, beech densities can be reduced while allowing shade-tolerant sugar maple to grow beneath shade-intolerant species that establish after harvest (Leak 1999). Subsequent timber stand improvement can then be used to shift species compositions to sugar maple and yellow birch (Leak and Smith 1997). Shelterwood harvests can favor beech-dominated understories when residual beech regeneration remains, root suckering increases, and harvests occur on mid-quality sites, because beech is typically more competitive than sugar maple on sites low in calcium and nitrogen (Boerner and Koslowsky 1989, Long et al. 1997). Preharvest site preparation (Kelty and Nyland 1981) and postharvest herbicide applications (Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986) can be effective strategies for promoting the establishment of sugar maple and yellow birch when combined with even-aged management. Advances in forest herbicide technology, including precise application rates, make it possible to test the performance of treatments designed to release desirable hardwood species from understory beech cover, similar to northern conifer release treatments (sensu Newton et al. 1992, Wagner and Robinson 2006). The high susceptibility of beech and low susceptibility of sugar maple to moderate glyphosate rates (Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986, Pitt et al. 1992, 1993) makes this herbicide an ideal candidate for testing the selective removal of beech and preservation of sugar maple following shelterwood harvests. We hypothesized that by systematically adjusting the glyphosate rate and surfactant concentration that a treatment combination could be identified that produced maximum beech control and minimal injury to sugar maple and other desirable hardwood species. The objectives of this study were to (1) document the relative susceptibility of five major hardwood species in Maine northern hardwood stands (beech, sugar maple, red maple, striped maple, and yellow birch) to various combinations of glyphosate herbicide (Accord Concentrate) and surfactant (EnTree 5735); (2) identify an optimal combination of glyphosate rate and surfactant concentration that produced the highest level of beech control and lowest level of sugar maple injury; and (3) determine whether the results produced using hydraulic nozzle applications (which were required to precisely control herbicide and surfactant application rates) were transferable to mistblower applications that would typically be used for industrial herbicide applications.","PeriodicalId":19281,"journal":{"name":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"28 1","pages":"186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/NJAF/28.4.186","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Composition of Beech-Dominated Northern Hardwood Understories in Northern Maine\",\"authors\":\"A. Nelson, R. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/NJAF/28.4.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"regeneration and pole-sized beech densities (Jones et al. 1989, Bohn and Nyland 2003, Nolet et al. 2008), but with larger gap/patch openings, beech densities can be reduced while allowing shade-tolerant sugar maple to grow beneath shade-intolerant species that establish after harvest (Leak 1999). Subsequent timber stand improvement can then be used to shift species compositions to sugar maple and yellow birch (Leak and Smith 1997). Shelterwood harvests can favor beech-dominated understories when residual beech regeneration remains, root suckering increases, and harvests occur on mid-quality sites, because beech is typically more competitive than sugar maple on sites low in calcium and nitrogen (Boerner and Koslowsky 1989, Long et al. 1997). Preharvest site preparation (Kelty and Nyland 1981) and postharvest herbicide applications (Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986) can be effective strategies for promoting the establishment of sugar maple and yellow birch when combined with even-aged management. Advances in forest herbicide technology, including precise application rates, make it possible to test the performance of treatments designed to release desirable hardwood species from understory beech cover, similar to northern conifer release treatments (sensu Newton et al. 1992, Wagner and Robinson 2006). The high susceptibility of beech and low susceptibility of sugar maple to moderate glyphosate rates (Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986, Pitt et al. 1992, 1993) makes this herbicide an ideal candidate for testing the selective removal of beech and preservation of sugar maple following shelterwood harvests. We hypothesized that by systematically adjusting the glyphosate rate and surfactant concentration that a treatment combination could be identified that produced maximum beech control and minimal injury to sugar maple and other desirable hardwood species. The objectives of this study were to (1) document the relative susceptibility of five major hardwood species in Maine northern hardwood stands (beech, sugar maple, red maple, striped maple, and yellow birch) to various combinations of glyphosate herbicide (Accord Concentrate) and surfactant (EnTree 5735); (2) identify an optimal combination of glyphosate rate and surfactant concentration that produced the highest level of beech control and lowest level of sugar maple injury; and (3) determine whether the results produced using hydraulic nozzle applications (which were required to precisely control herbicide and surfactant application rates) were transferable to mistblower applications that would typically be used for industrial herbicide applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"186-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/NJAF/28.4.186\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/NJAF/28.4.186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/NJAF/28.4.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
再生和竹竿大小的山毛榉密度(Jones et al. 1989, Bohn and Nyland 2003, Nolet et al. 2008),但随着更大的间隙/斑块开口,山毛榉密度可以降低,同时允许耐阴糖枫在收获后建立的耐阴树种下生长(Leak 1999)。随后的林分改善可用于将树种组成转变为糖枫和黄桦(Leak and Smith 1997)。当残留的山毛榉还在再生,吸根量增加,并且在中等质量的地点收获时,杉木采伐有利于山毛榉为主的林下植被,因为在钙和氮含量低的地点,山毛榉通常比糖枫更具竞争力(Boerner and Koslowsky 1989, Long et al. 1997)。采前准备(Kelty and Nyland 1981)和采后施用除草剂(Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986)与平均树龄管理相结合,可以成为促进糖枫和黄桦成树的有效策略。森林除草剂技术的进步,包括精确的施用率,使得测试旨在从山毛榉林下覆盖层释放所需硬木物种的处理的性能成为可能,类似于北方针叶树释放处理(sensu Newton等人,1992;Wagner和Robinson, 2006)。山毛榉对草甘膦的敏感性高,而糖枫对草甘膦的敏感性低(Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986, Pitt et al. 1992, 1993),这使得该除草剂成为测试在防护林收获后选择性去除山毛榉和保存糖枫的理想候选除草剂。我们假设,通过系统地调节草甘膦的用量和表面活性剂的浓度,可以确定一种能最大限度地控制山毛榉、最小限度地损害糖枫和其他理想硬木树种的处理组合。本研究的目的是:(1)记录缅因州北部阔叶林中五种主要硬木树种(山毛榉、糖枫、红枫、条纹枫和黄桦)对各种草甘膦除草剂(Accord浓缩剂)和表面活性剂(EnTree 5735)组合的相对敏感性;(2)确定草甘膦浓度和表面活性剂浓度的最佳组合,使山毛榉的防治水平最高,糖枫的危害水平最低;(3)确定使用液压喷嘴应用(需要精确控制除草剂和表面活性剂的施用量)产生的结果是否可转移到通常用于工业除草剂应用的吹雾器应用中。
Improving the Composition of Beech-Dominated Northern Hardwood Understories in Northern Maine
regeneration and pole-sized beech densities (Jones et al. 1989, Bohn and Nyland 2003, Nolet et al. 2008), but with larger gap/patch openings, beech densities can be reduced while allowing shade-tolerant sugar maple to grow beneath shade-intolerant species that establish after harvest (Leak 1999). Subsequent timber stand improvement can then be used to shift species compositions to sugar maple and yellow birch (Leak and Smith 1997). Shelterwood harvests can favor beech-dominated understories when residual beech regeneration remains, root suckering increases, and harvests occur on mid-quality sites, because beech is typically more competitive than sugar maple on sites low in calcium and nitrogen (Boerner and Koslowsky 1989, Long et al. 1997). Preharvest site preparation (Kelty and Nyland 1981) and postharvest herbicide applications (Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986) can be effective strategies for promoting the establishment of sugar maple and yellow birch when combined with even-aged management. Advances in forest herbicide technology, including precise application rates, make it possible to test the performance of treatments designed to release desirable hardwood species from understory beech cover, similar to northern conifer release treatments (sensu Newton et al. 1992, Wagner and Robinson 2006). The high susceptibility of beech and low susceptibility of sugar maple to moderate glyphosate rates (Ostrofsky and McCormack 1986, Pitt et al. 1992, 1993) makes this herbicide an ideal candidate for testing the selective removal of beech and preservation of sugar maple following shelterwood harvests. We hypothesized that by systematically adjusting the glyphosate rate and surfactant concentration that a treatment combination could be identified that produced maximum beech control and minimal injury to sugar maple and other desirable hardwood species. The objectives of this study were to (1) document the relative susceptibility of five major hardwood species in Maine northern hardwood stands (beech, sugar maple, red maple, striped maple, and yellow birch) to various combinations of glyphosate herbicide (Accord Concentrate) and surfactant (EnTree 5735); (2) identify an optimal combination of glyphosate rate and surfactant concentration that produced the highest level of beech control and lowest level of sugar maple injury; and (3) determine whether the results produced using hydraulic nozzle applications (which were required to precisely control herbicide and surfactant application rates) were transferable to mistblower applications that would typically be used for industrial herbicide applications.