解开社会-生态相互作用:解决当代渔业可持续性挑战的方法组合方法

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES Fish and Fisheries Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.1111/faf.12678
Emilie Lindkvist, Kara E. Pellowe, Steven M. Alexander, Elizabeth Drury O'Neill, Elena M. Finkbeiner, Alfredo Girón-Nava, Blanca González-Mon, Andrew F. Johnson, Jeremy Pittman, Caroline Schill, Nanda Wijermans, ?rjan Bodin, Stefan Gelcich, Marion Glaser
{"title":"解开社会-生态相互作用:解决当代渔业可持续性挑战的方法组合方法","authors":"Emilie Lindkvist,&nbsp;Kara E. Pellowe,&nbsp;Steven M. Alexander,&nbsp;Elizabeth Drury O'Neill,&nbsp;Elena M. Finkbeiner,&nbsp;Alfredo Girón-Nava,&nbsp;Blanca González-Mon,&nbsp;Andrew F. Johnson,&nbsp;Jeremy Pittman,&nbsp;Caroline Schill,&nbsp;Nanda Wijermans,&nbsp;?rjan Bodin,&nbsp;Stefan Gelcich,&nbsp;Marion Glaser","doi":"10.1111/faf.12678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"23 5","pages":"1202-1220"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12678","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries\",\"authors\":\"Emilie Lindkvist,&nbsp;Kara E. Pellowe,&nbsp;Steven M. Alexander,&nbsp;Elizabeth Drury O'Neill,&nbsp;Elena M. Finkbeiner,&nbsp;Alfredo Girón-Nava,&nbsp;Blanca González-Mon,&nbsp;Andrew F. Johnson,&nbsp;Jeremy Pittman,&nbsp;Caroline Schill,&nbsp;Nanda Wijermans,&nbsp;?rjan Bodin,&nbsp;Stefan Gelcich,&nbsp;Marion Glaser\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"1202-1220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12678\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12678\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

实现可持续渔业管理的目标需要注意产生渔业成果的人类、机构和生态系统之间复杂的相互作用。研究渔业的传统方法往往不能完全捕捉,也不能关注人类与生态系统之间复杂的相互作用。尽管更全面的方法(例如基于生态系统的渔业管理方法)在相互作用的范围和规模上取得了进展,但没有任何一种方法能够充分反映人与自然相互作用的复杂性。结合定量和定性分析方法的方法对于更深入地了解这些相互作用并阐明应对渔业可持续性挑战的途径是必要的。然而,结合方法本身就具有挑战性,需要理解来自不同学科的多种方法,这就要求研究人员具有反思性。社会-生态系统的研究历来综合利用社会和生态领域的方法,以解释作为渔业关键组成部分的时空动态、不确定性和反馈。我们描述了几种分析方法(统计建模、网络分析、动态建模、定性分析和控制行为实验),并强调了它们在渔业研究中的应用、优势和局限性、数据需求和总体目标。然后我们讨论方法组合开发过程的重要考虑因素,包括反身性、认识论和本体论问题,并通过三个案例研究说明这些考虑因素。我们表明,通过扩大他们的方法组合,研究人员将更好地研究形成渔业的复杂相互作用,并为可持续渔业管理的解决方案做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries

Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
期刊最新文献
A Global Synthesis of Environmental Enrichment Effect on Fish Stress Accounting for Salmon Body Size Declines in Fishery Management Can Reduce Conservation Risks Mesopelagic Fish Traits: Functions and Trade‐Offs Closing the Gaps in Fish Welfare: The Case for More Fundamental Work Into Physical Enrichment Widespread Evidence for Rapid Recent Changes in Global Range and Abundance of Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1