David R. Kienle, Severin D. H. Irl, Carl Beierkuhnlein
{"title":"质量高程效应和大陆性对全球树线的影响大于空间隔离","authors":"David R. Kienle, Severin D. H. Irl, Carl Beierkuhnlein","doi":"10.1111/geb.13689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The global relationship between treeline elevation and temperature (or latitude as a proxy) is well established. However, additional large-scale and regional abiotic influences such as mass elevation effect (MEE), continentality and isolation are superimposed onto the latitude-treeline relationship. To quantify these effects, we apply globally applicable measures and test the effects of MEE, an aspect of continental climate and isolation on treeline elevation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global treeline elevations (<i>n</i> = 629).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We sampled treeline sites using earth observation. We calculated MEE as the distance to the nearest mountain chain limits. Continentality was assessed by the distance to the nearest coastline. Isolation was calculated by the nearest distance of a mountain chain to another mountain chain within a comparable elevational band.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The global latitudinal pattern showed a distinct bimodal latitude-treeline elevation relationship. Treeline elevations increased substantially with increased MEE and distance to coastlines while isolation even decreased treeline elevations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study shows a globally consistent effect of MEE and distance to the coastline on treeline elevation, contributing to our basic understanding of large-scale biogeographic processes governing treeline formation. MEE and continentality reduce cloudiness and increase solar radiation, resulting in higher treeline elevations. Isolation effects are not consistent and may be influenced by immigration and speciation. Understanding global treeline formation using comprehensive measures contributes to a better understanding of how environmental conditions determine vegetation boundaries at large spatial scales.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"32 7","pages":"1087-1097"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13689","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass elevation effect and continentality have a stronger impact on global treelines than spatial isolation\",\"authors\":\"David R. Kienle, Severin D. H. Irl, Carl Beierkuhnlein\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The global relationship between treeline elevation and temperature (or latitude as a proxy) is well established. However, additional large-scale and regional abiotic influences such as mass elevation effect (MEE), continentality and isolation are superimposed onto the latitude-treeline relationship. To quantify these effects, we apply globally applicable measures and test the effects of MEE, an aspect of continental climate and isolation on treeline elevation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global treeline elevations (<i>n</i> = 629).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We sampled treeline sites using earth observation. We calculated MEE as the distance to the nearest mountain chain limits. Continentality was assessed by the distance to the nearest coastline. Isolation was calculated by the nearest distance of a mountain chain to another mountain chain within a comparable elevational band.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The global latitudinal pattern showed a distinct bimodal latitude-treeline elevation relationship. Treeline elevations increased substantially with increased MEE and distance to coastlines while isolation even decreased treeline elevations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study shows a globally consistent effect of MEE and distance to the coastline on treeline elevation, contributing to our basic understanding of large-scale biogeographic processes governing treeline formation. MEE and continentality reduce cloudiness and increase solar radiation, resulting in higher treeline elevations. Isolation effects are not consistent and may be influenced by immigration and speciation. Understanding global treeline formation using comprehensive measures contributes to a better understanding of how environmental conditions determine vegetation boundaries at large spatial scales.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"32 7\",\"pages\":\"1087-1097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13689\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13689\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13689","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mass elevation effect and continentality have a stronger impact on global treelines than spatial isolation
Aim
The global relationship between treeline elevation and temperature (or latitude as a proxy) is well established. However, additional large-scale and regional abiotic influences such as mass elevation effect (MEE), continentality and isolation are superimposed onto the latitude-treeline relationship. To quantify these effects, we apply globally applicable measures and test the effects of MEE, an aspect of continental climate and isolation on treeline elevation.
Location
Global treeline elevations (n = 629).
Methods
We sampled treeline sites using earth observation. We calculated MEE as the distance to the nearest mountain chain limits. Continentality was assessed by the distance to the nearest coastline. Isolation was calculated by the nearest distance of a mountain chain to another mountain chain within a comparable elevational band.
Results
The global latitudinal pattern showed a distinct bimodal latitude-treeline elevation relationship. Treeline elevations increased substantially with increased MEE and distance to coastlines while isolation even decreased treeline elevations.
Main Conclusions
Our study shows a globally consistent effect of MEE and distance to the coastline on treeline elevation, contributing to our basic understanding of large-scale biogeographic processes governing treeline formation. MEE and continentality reduce cloudiness and increase solar radiation, resulting in higher treeline elevations. Isolation effects are not consistent and may be influenced by immigration and speciation. Understanding global treeline formation using comprehensive measures contributes to a better understanding of how environmental conditions determine vegetation boundaries at large spatial scales.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.