衡量初级保健组织的成功:可能吗?

B. Leese, K. Baxter, N. Goodwin, J. Scott, A. Mahon
{"title":"衡量初级保健组织的成功:可能吗?","authors":"B. Leese, K. Baxter, N. Goodwin, J. Scott, A. Mahon","doi":"10.1108/14777260110695518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary care in the UK has been the subject of numerous changes and reorganizations since 1990. Each innovation in organization, with the exception of fundholding, has been the subject of evaluation. However, the complexities of some innovations make the evaluation process problematic and this is further complicated by the trend towards central policy decision making being subject to local interpretation and implementation, by means of simultaneous devolution and centralization. This paper discusses the challenges and problems posed by attempting to evaluate these new organizations, particularly with regard to whether or not they can be considered to be \"successful\". It draws specifically on the national evaluation of the total purchasing pilots and indicates how the findings can be applied to primary care groups.","PeriodicalId":80033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of management in medicine","volume":"15 2 1","pages":"172-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/14777260110695518","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the success of primary care organizations: is it possible?\",\"authors\":\"B. Leese, K. Baxter, N. Goodwin, J. Scott, A. Mahon\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/14777260110695518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primary care in the UK has been the subject of numerous changes and reorganizations since 1990. Each innovation in organization, with the exception of fundholding, has been the subject of evaluation. However, the complexities of some innovations make the evaluation process problematic and this is further complicated by the trend towards central policy decision making being subject to local interpretation and implementation, by means of simultaneous devolution and centralization. This paper discusses the challenges and problems posed by attempting to evaluate these new organizations, particularly with regard to whether or not they can be considered to be \\\"successful\\\". It draws specifically on the national evaluation of the total purchasing pilots and indicates how the findings can be applied to primary care groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2 1\",\"pages\":\"172-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/14777260110695518\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260110695518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of management in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260110695518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

自1990年以来,英国的初级保健一直是许多变化和重组的主题。除了资金控制之外,组织中的每一项创新都是评估的主题。然而,一些创新的复杂性使评价过程出现问题,而中央政策决策受制于地方解释和执行的趋势,通过权力下放和集中同时进行,使问题进一步复杂化。本文讨论了试图评估这些新组织所带来的挑战和问题,特别是关于它们是否可以被认为是“成功的”。它特别借鉴了对总采购试点的国家评估,并指出如何将研究结果应用于初级保健团体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the success of primary care organizations: is it possible?
Primary care in the UK has been the subject of numerous changes and reorganizations since 1990. Each innovation in organization, with the exception of fundholding, has been the subject of evaluation. However, the complexities of some innovations make the evaluation process problematic and this is further complicated by the trend towards central policy decision making being subject to local interpretation and implementation, by means of simultaneous devolution and centralization. This paper discusses the challenges and problems posed by attempting to evaluate these new organizations, particularly with regard to whether or not they can be considered to be "successful". It draws specifically on the national evaluation of the total purchasing pilots and indicates how the findings can be applied to primary care groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality in health care Patient perceptions of service quality Multi‐professional Learning for Nurses: Breaking the Boundaries Cross-sector working: speech and language therapists in education. Managing performance and performance management: information strategy and service user involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1