评估NHS反应性研究项目的回报。

B. Ferguson, P. Kelly, A. Georgiou, G. Barnes, B. Sutherland, B. Woodbridge
{"title":"评估NHS反应性研究项目的回报。","authors":"B. Ferguson, P. Kelly, A. Georgiou, G. Barnes, B. Sutherland, B. Woodbridge","doi":"10.1108/02689230010340363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims to assess retrospectively the payback from NHS reactive research programmes in the Northern and Yorkshire region. A questionnaire was sent to all recipients of regional reactive research programme funding (biomedical, health services research (HSR), and primary and community care programmes) between 1 April 1991 and 31 March 1996. The sample available for analysis involved 174 respondents covering 119 projects, with a total financial value of 2.2 million Pounds. The main outcome measures used were peer-reviewed publications, changes in individual practice, changes in NHS service delivery and organisation, and impact on the careers of researchers. Overall, 119 projects produced 230 peer-reviewed publications: this was achieved at an average cost of 10,673 Pounds, 6,386 Pounds and 22,310 Pounds per publication for the biomedical, HSR, and primary and community care programmes respectively. From the qualitative data analysis, important changes in individual practice and NHS service delivery were identified by respondents. The researchers in our sample appeared to have attracted over 6 million Pounds in R&D funding related to the initial regional grant. Although based on self-report, there is evidence to suggest that the return on investment from NHS R&D can be substantial, taking a broad view of benefits to the NHS and to researchers. The findings also confirm the need for more effective dissemination and implementation of research findings.","PeriodicalId":80033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of management in medicine","volume":"14 1 1","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02689230010340363","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing payback from NHS reactive research programmes.\",\"authors\":\"B. Ferguson, P. Kelly, A. Georgiou, G. Barnes, B. Sutherland, B. Woodbridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/02689230010340363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims to assess retrospectively the payback from NHS reactive research programmes in the Northern and Yorkshire region. A questionnaire was sent to all recipients of regional reactive research programme funding (biomedical, health services research (HSR), and primary and community care programmes) between 1 April 1991 and 31 March 1996. The sample available for analysis involved 174 respondents covering 119 projects, with a total financial value of 2.2 million Pounds. The main outcome measures used were peer-reviewed publications, changes in individual practice, changes in NHS service delivery and organisation, and impact on the careers of researchers. Overall, 119 projects produced 230 peer-reviewed publications: this was achieved at an average cost of 10,673 Pounds, 6,386 Pounds and 22,310 Pounds per publication for the biomedical, HSR, and primary and community care programmes respectively. From the qualitative data analysis, important changes in individual practice and NHS service delivery were identified by respondents. The researchers in our sample appeared to have attracted over 6 million Pounds in R&D funding related to the initial regional grant. Although based on self-report, there is evidence to suggest that the return on investment from NHS R&D can be substantial, taking a broad view of benefits to the NHS and to researchers. The findings also confirm the need for more effective dissemination and implementation of research findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1 1\",\"pages\":\"25-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02689230010340363\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/02689230010340363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of management in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/02689230010340363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

旨在回顾评估从NHS反应性研究方案在北部和约克郡地区的回报。1991年4月1日至1996年3月31日期间,向所有接受区域反应性研究方案资金(生物医学、保健服务研究、初级和社区保健方案)的人发送了一份调查表。可供分析的样本涉及174名受访者,涵盖119个项目,总财务价值为220万英镑。使用的主要结果测量是同行评审的出版物,个人实践的变化,NHS服务提供和组织的变化,以及对研究人员职业生涯的影响。总体而言,119个项目产生了230份同行评议出版物:生物医学、高铁和初级和社区保健方案的平均每份出版物成本分别为10 673英镑、6 386英镑和22 310英镑。从定性数据分析中,受访者确定了个人实践和NHS服务交付的重要变化。我们样本中的研究人员似乎已经吸引了超过600万英镑的研发资金,这些资金与最初的地区资助有关。虽然基于自我报告,但有证据表明,从NHS和研究人员的广泛利益来看,NHS研发的投资回报可能是可观的。调查结果还证实需要更有效地传播和执行研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing payback from NHS reactive research programmes.
Aims to assess retrospectively the payback from NHS reactive research programmes in the Northern and Yorkshire region. A questionnaire was sent to all recipients of regional reactive research programme funding (biomedical, health services research (HSR), and primary and community care programmes) between 1 April 1991 and 31 March 1996. The sample available for analysis involved 174 respondents covering 119 projects, with a total financial value of 2.2 million Pounds. The main outcome measures used were peer-reviewed publications, changes in individual practice, changes in NHS service delivery and organisation, and impact on the careers of researchers. Overall, 119 projects produced 230 peer-reviewed publications: this was achieved at an average cost of 10,673 Pounds, 6,386 Pounds and 22,310 Pounds per publication for the biomedical, HSR, and primary and community care programmes respectively. From the qualitative data analysis, important changes in individual practice and NHS service delivery were identified by respondents. The researchers in our sample appeared to have attracted over 6 million Pounds in R&D funding related to the initial regional grant. Although based on self-report, there is evidence to suggest that the return on investment from NHS R&D can be substantial, taking a broad view of benefits to the NHS and to researchers. The findings also confirm the need for more effective dissemination and implementation of research findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality in health care Patient perceptions of service quality Multi‐professional Learning for Nurses: Breaking the Boundaries Cross-sector working: speech and language therapists in education. Managing performance and performance management: information strategy and service user involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1