循证医学与风险:职业认同表达中的修辞资源。

James Alastair McLaughlin
{"title":"循证医学与风险:职业认同表达中的修辞资源。","authors":"James Alastair McLaughlin","doi":"10.1108/02689230110412326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become a major theme within health care. This has fuelled a significant debate about its role in reducing risk and its possible impact on professional autonomy. Challenges arguments that propose that EBM is a threat to professional power and status by looking at how evidence, risk and professional knowledge come to have meaning. The objective is to deconstruct all three as discursive constructions whose meanings are malleable and embedded in social and power relations. By drawing on sociological debates about the social construction of evidence, risk and professional autonomy indicates the ways in which EBM is neither a rational alternative to the seemingly unending risks of contemporary medicine, nor in opposition to professional status. Instead it concludes by arguing that EBM and notions of risk are rhetorical resources in the articulation of professional autonomy and identity.","PeriodicalId":80033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of management in medicine","volume":"15 4-5 1","pages":"352-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02689230110412326","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EBM and risk: rhetorical resources in the articulation of professional identity.\",\"authors\":\"James Alastair McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/02689230110412326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become a major theme within health care. This has fuelled a significant debate about its role in reducing risk and its possible impact on professional autonomy. Challenges arguments that propose that EBM is a threat to professional power and status by looking at how evidence, risk and professional knowledge come to have meaning. The objective is to deconstruct all three as discursive constructions whose meanings are malleable and embedded in social and power relations. By drawing on sociological debates about the social construction of evidence, risk and professional autonomy indicates the ways in which EBM is neither a rational alternative to the seemingly unending risks of contemporary medicine, nor in opposition to professional status. Instead it concludes by arguing that EBM and notions of risk are rhetorical resources in the articulation of professional autonomy and identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 4-5 1\",\"pages\":\"352-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02689230110412326\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/02689230110412326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of management in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/02689230110412326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

循证医学(EBM)已成为卫生保健领域的一个重要主题。这引发了一场关于它在降低风险方面的作用及其对职业自主可能产生的影响的重大辩论。通过研究证据、风险和专业知识是如何产生意义的,挑战那些认为循证医学是对专业权力和地位的威胁的论点。我们的目标是解构这三种话语结构,它们的意义是可塑的,嵌入在社会和权力关系中。通过借鉴关于证据、风险和专业自主的社会建构的社会学辩论,表明循证医学既不是对当代医学看似无休止的风险的理性替代,也不是对专业地位的反对。相反,它的结论是,循证医学和风险概念是表达职业自主和身份的修辞资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EBM and risk: rhetorical resources in the articulation of professional identity.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become a major theme within health care. This has fuelled a significant debate about its role in reducing risk and its possible impact on professional autonomy. Challenges arguments that propose that EBM is a threat to professional power and status by looking at how evidence, risk and professional knowledge come to have meaning. The objective is to deconstruct all three as discursive constructions whose meanings are malleable and embedded in social and power relations. By drawing on sociological debates about the social construction of evidence, risk and professional autonomy indicates the ways in which EBM is neither a rational alternative to the seemingly unending risks of contemporary medicine, nor in opposition to professional status. Instead it concludes by arguing that EBM and notions of risk are rhetorical resources in the articulation of professional autonomy and identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality in health care Patient perceptions of service quality Multi‐professional Learning for Nurses: Breaking the Boundaries Cross-sector working: speech and language therapists in education. Managing performance and performance management: information strategy and service user involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1