“可怕的孩子”:澳大利亚和多边贸易体系的重建,1946-8

IF 0.5 4区 历史学 Q4 ECONOMICS Australian Economic History Review Pub Date : 2000-03-01 DOI:10.1111/1467-8446.00053
A. Capling
{"title":"“可怕的孩子”:澳大利亚和多边贸易体系的重建,1946-8","authors":"A. Capling","doi":"10.1111/1467-8446.00053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years Australia has been recognized as a prominent player in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO). Less well known is Australia’s activism during the establishment of the GATT. This article, based on archival sources and contemporary accounts, examines Australia’s role in the birth of the multilateral trade system. It seeks to nuance the two conventional interpretations of this period, the first which argues that countries joined the GATT because it was in their economic interests to do so, and the second which suggests that the United States hegemony imposed its trade liberalization objectives on less powerful allies and trade partners.","PeriodicalId":54143,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-8446.00053","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘Enfant Terrible’: Australia and the Reconstruction of the Multilateral Trade system, 1946–8\",\"authors\":\"A. Capling\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8446.00053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years Australia has been recognized as a prominent player in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO). Less well known is Australia’s activism during the establishment of the GATT. This article, based on archival sources and contemporary accounts, examines Australia’s role in the birth of the multilateral trade system. It seeks to nuance the two conventional interpretations of this period, the first which argues that countries joined the GATT because it was in their economic interests to do so, and the second which suggests that the United States hegemony imposed its trade liberalization objectives on less powerful allies and trade partners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Economic History Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-8446.00053\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Economic History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8446.00053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8446.00053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

近年来,澳大利亚被公认为关税及贸易总协定(关贸总协定)及其后继者世界贸易组织(世贸组织)的一个重要参与者。鲜为人知的是澳大利亚在建立关贸总协定期间的积极行动。本文以档案资料和当代记述为基础,考察了澳大利亚在多边贸易体系诞生中的作用。它试图对这一时期的两种传统解释进行细微的区分,第一种解释认为各国加入关贸总协定是因为这样做符合它们的经济利益,第二种解释认为美国霸权将其贸易自由化目标强加给了实力较弱的盟友和贸易伙伴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The ‘Enfant Terrible’: Australia and the Reconstruction of the Multilateral Trade system, 1946–8
In recent years Australia has been recognized as a prominent player in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO). Less well known is Australia’s activism during the establishment of the GATT. This article, based on archival sources and contemporary accounts, examines Australia’s role in the birth of the multilateral trade system. It seeks to nuance the two conventional interpretations of this period, the first which argues that countries joined the GATT because it was in their economic interests to do so, and the second which suggests that the United States hegemony imposed its trade liberalization objectives on less powerful allies and trade partners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Economic History Review is concerned with the historical treatment of economic, social and business issues, particularly (but not exclusively) relating to Australia, New Zealand and adjoining regions in Asia and the Pacific. Papers examine these issues not only from the perspective of economic history but also from the related disciplines of history, economics, history of economic thought, industrial relations, demography, sociology, politics and business studies.
期刊最新文献
The Power of Economic Ideas: The Origins of Keynesian Macroeconomic Management in Interwar Australia 1929–39 – By Alex Millmow Up From the Underworld: Coalminers and Community in Wonthaggi 1909 to 1968 – By Andrew Reeves Global Economic History: a Very Short Introduction – By Robert C. Allen The ‘Enfant Terrible’: Australia and the Reconstruction of the Multilateral Trade system, 1946–8 To Market! To Market! The Changing Role of the Australian Timber Merchant, 1945–c.1965
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1