词汇前缀树与WFST: LVCSR中两种动态搜索概念的比较

David Rybach, H. Ney, R. Schlüter
{"title":"词汇前缀树与WFST: LVCSR中两种动态搜索概念的比较","authors":"David Rybach, H. Ney, R. Schlüter","doi":"10.1109/TASL.2013.2248723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic network decoders have the advantage of significantly lower memory consumption compared to static network decoders, especially when huge vocabularies and complex language models are required. This paper compares the properties of two well-known search strategies for dynamic network decoding, namely history conditioned lexical tree search and weighted finite-state transducer-based search using on-the-fly transducer composition. The two search strategies share many common principles like the use of dynamic programming, beam search, and many more. We point out the similarities of both approaches and investigate the implications of their differing features, both formally and experimentally, with a focus on implementation independent properties. Therefore, experimental results are obtained with a single decoder by representing the history conditioned lexical tree search strategy in the transducer framework. The properties analyzed cover structure and size of the search space, differences in hypotheses recombination, language model look-ahead techniques, and lattice generation.","PeriodicalId":55014,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TASL.2013.2248723","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical Prefix Tree and WFST: A Comparison of Two Dynamic Search Concepts for LVCSR\",\"authors\":\"David Rybach, H. Ney, R. Schlüter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TASL.2013.2248723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dynamic network decoders have the advantage of significantly lower memory consumption compared to static network decoders, especially when huge vocabularies and complex language models are required. This paper compares the properties of two well-known search strategies for dynamic network decoding, namely history conditioned lexical tree search and weighted finite-state transducer-based search using on-the-fly transducer composition. The two search strategies share many common principles like the use of dynamic programming, beam search, and many more. We point out the similarities of both approaches and investigate the implications of their differing features, both formally and experimentally, with a focus on implementation independent properties. Therefore, experimental results are obtained with a single decoder by representing the history conditioned lexical tree search strategy in the transducer framework. The properties analyzed cover structure and size of the search space, differences in hypotheses recombination, language model look-ahead techniques, and lattice generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TASL.2013.2248723\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2013.2248723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2013.2248723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

与静态网络解码器相比,动态网络解码器具有显著降低内存消耗的优势,特别是在需要巨大的词汇表和复杂的语言模型时。本文比较了两种著名的动态网络解码搜索策略的特性,即历史条件词汇树搜索和基于加权有限状态换能器的动态换能器组合搜索。这两种搜索策略有许多共同的原则,比如使用动态规划、束搜索等等。我们指出了这两种方法的相似之处,并在形式上和实验上研究了它们不同特征的含义,重点是实现独立的属性。因此,通过在换能器框架中表示历史条件词法树搜索策略,可以在单个解码器上获得实验结果。分析的属性包括搜索空间的结构和大小、假设重组的差异、语言模型前瞻性技术和格生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lexical Prefix Tree and WFST: A Comparison of Two Dynamic Search Concepts for LVCSR
Dynamic network decoders have the advantage of significantly lower memory consumption compared to static network decoders, especially when huge vocabularies and complex language models are required. This paper compares the properties of two well-known search strategies for dynamic network decoding, namely history conditioned lexical tree search and weighted finite-state transducer-based search using on-the-fly transducer composition. The two search strategies share many common principles like the use of dynamic programming, beam search, and many more. We point out the similarities of both approaches and investigate the implications of their differing features, both formally and experimentally, with a focus on implementation independent properties. Therefore, experimental results are obtained with a single decoder by representing the history conditioned lexical tree search strategy in the transducer framework. The properties analyzed cover structure and size of the search space, differences in hypotheses recombination, language model look-ahead techniques, and lattice generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24.0 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing covers the sciences, technologies and applications relating to the analysis, coding, enhancement, recognition and synthesis of audio, music, speech and language. In particular, audio processing also covers auditory modeling, acoustic modeling and source separation. Speech processing also covers speech production and perception, adaptation, lexical modeling and speaker recognition. Language processing also covers spoken language understanding, translation, summarization, mining, general language modeling, as well as spoken dialog systems.
期刊最新文献
A High-Quality Speech and Audio Codec With Less Than 10-ms Delay Efficient Approximation of Head-Related Transfer Functions in Subbands for Accurate Sound Localization. Epoch Extraction Based on Integrated Linear Prediction Residual Using Plosion Index Body Conducted Speech Enhancement by Equalization and Signal Fusion Soundfield Imaging in the Ray Space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1