一种用于定量细菌和病毒指标的斑点滴度培养试验的发展

N.K. BECK, K. CALLAHAN, S.P. NAPPIER, H. KIM, M.D. SOBSEY, J.S. MESCHKE
{"title":"一种用于定量细菌和病毒指标的斑点滴度培养试验的发展","authors":"N.K. BECK,&nbsp;K. CALLAHAN,&nbsp;S.P. NAPPIER,&nbsp;H. KIM,&nbsp;M.D. SOBSEY,&nbsp;J.S. MESCHKE","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p> <i>The spread-plate and double agar layer (DAL) methods are common for the enumeration of bacteria and viral indicators (bacteriophages). However, they may become cumbersome in large matrix experiments or when the titer of the organism varies by several orders of magnitude. A bacterial spot-titer assay has been available for decades but has not been adapted to bacteriophages and has rarely been applied to the analysis of environmental samples. In this study, a spot-titer culture-based method was investigated for bacteria and bacteriophages. The method involves spot-plating replicate 10-µl volumes of several sample dilutions on a single plate, incubating, and counting colonies or plaques. Parallel assays of laboratory cultures and environmentally isolated organisms show that the spot-titer method is equally straightforward and statistically comparable to the spread-plate and DAL methods (</i>R<i><sup>2</sup> = 0.989 for laboratory strains and</i> R<i><sup>2</sup> = 0.972 for environmental samples), while more cost- and labor-efficient.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\n \n <p>The spread-plate and double agar layer (DAL) methods currently used for enumeration of bacteria and viral indicators, may become labor- and resource-intensive (culture media, plates, technician time and incubator space) in large matrix experiments, which are often needed in the laboratory to evaluate environmental conditions. The spot-titer method has several advantages over the spread-plate and DAL methods: (1) it requires less time to dispense spots than to spread the microbe; (2) it uses fewer materials (15–20% of the laboratory supplies as the traditional methods); (3) it requires less effort; and (4) since the sample is distributed in distinct spots, colony/plaque counting is faster and less labor intensive. The spot-titer method was found to economize resources without sacrificing accuracy or precision, and is a practical method for routine use in large matrix experiments (e.g., survival or disinfection studies) and enumeration of high-titer environmental samples.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"455-464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEVELOPMENT OF A SPOT-TITER CULTURE ASSAY FOR QUANTIFYING BACTERIA AND VIRAL INDICATORS\",\"authors\":\"N.K. BECK,&nbsp;K. CALLAHAN,&nbsp;S.P. NAPPIER,&nbsp;H. KIM,&nbsp;M.D. SOBSEY,&nbsp;J.S. MESCHKE\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\\n \\n <p> <i>The spread-plate and double agar layer (DAL) methods are common for the enumeration of bacteria and viral indicators (bacteriophages). However, they may become cumbersome in large matrix experiments or when the titer of the organism varies by several orders of magnitude. A bacterial spot-titer assay has been available for decades but has not been adapted to bacteriophages and has rarely been applied to the analysis of environmental samples. In this study, a spot-titer culture-based method was investigated for bacteria and bacteriophages. The method involves spot-plating replicate 10-µl volumes of several sample dilutions on a single plate, incubating, and counting colonies or plaques. Parallel assays of laboratory cultures and environmentally isolated organisms show that the spot-titer method is equally straightforward and statistically comparable to the spread-plate and DAL methods (</i>R<i><sup>2</sup> = 0.989 for laboratory strains and</i> R<i><sup>2</sup> = 0.972 for environmental samples), while more cost- and labor-efficient.</i></p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\\n \\n <p>The spread-plate and double agar layer (DAL) methods currently used for enumeration of bacteria and viral indicators, may become labor- and resource-intensive (culture media, plates, technician time and incubator space) in large matrix experiments, which are often needed in the laboratory to evaluate environmental conditions. The spot-titer method has several advantages over the spread-plate and DAL methods: (1) it requires less time to dispense spots than to spread the microbe; (2) it uses fewer materials (15–20% of the laboratory supplies as the traditional methods); (3) it requires less effort; and (4) since the sample is distributed in distinct spots, colony/plaque counting is faster and less labor intensive. The spot-titer method was found to economize resources without sacrificing accuracy or precision, and is a practical method for routine use in large matrix experiments (e.g., survival or disinfection studies) and enumeration of high-titer environmental samples.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"455-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

扩展板和双琼脂层(DAL)法是常用的细菌和病毒指标(噬菌体)的计数方法。然而,在大型基质实验中或当生物体的滴度变化几个数量级时,它们可能变得麻烦。细菌滴度测定法已有几十年的历史,但尚未适用于噬菌体,也很少应用于环境样品的分析。本研究研究了一种基于点滴度培养的细菌和噬菌体检测方法。该方法包括在单个平板上复制10 μ l体积的几种样品稀释,孵育并计数菌落或空斑。实验室培养物和环境分离生物的平行分析表明,点滴法与张开板法和DAL法同样简单,在统计上可与之相比(实验室菌株的R2 = 0.989,环境样品的R2 = 0.972),同时成本和劳动效率更高。目前用于细菌和病毒指标计数的扩展板和双琼脂层(DAL)方法在大型基质实验中可能会成为劳动力和资源密集型(培养基,板,技术人员时间和培养箱空间),而实验室通常需要这些方法来评估环境条件。与扩散板法和DAL法相比,斑点滴度法有几个优点:(1)分配斑点所需的时间比扩散微生物所需的时间少;(2)耗材少(传统方法为实验室耗材的15-20%);(3)省力;(4)由于样品分布在不同的点,菌落/菌斑计数更快,劳动强度更低。发现现场滴度法在不牺牲准确性或精密度的情况下节省资源,并且是在大型基质实验(例如生存或消毒研究)和高滴度环境样品枚举中常规使用的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DEVELOPMENT OF A SPOT-TITER CULTURE ASSAY FOR QUANTIFYING BACTERIA AND VIRAL INDICATORS

ABSTRACT

The spread-plate and double agar layer (DAL) methods are common for the enumeration of bacteria and viral indicators (bacteriophages). However, they may become cumbersome in large matrix experiments or when the titer of the organism varies by several orders of magnitude. A bacterial spot-titer assay has been available for decades but has not been adapted to bacteriophages and has rarely been applied to the analysis of environmental samples. In this study, a spot-titer culture-based method was investigated for bacteria and bacteriophages. The method involves spot-plating replicate 10-µl volumes of several sample dilutions on a single plate, incubating, and counting colonies or plaques. Parallel assays of laboratory cultures and environmentally isolated organisms show that the spot-titer method is equally straightforward and statistically comparable to the spread-plate and DAL methods (R2 = 0.989 for laboratory strains and R2 = 0.972 for environmental samples), while more cost- and labor-efficient.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The spread-plate and double agar layer (DAL) methods currently used for enumeration of bacteria and viral indicators, may become labor- and resource-intensive (culture media, plates, technician time and incubator space) in large matrix experiments, which are often needed in the laboratory to evaluate environmental conditions. The spot-titer method has several advantages over the spread-plate and DAL methods: (1) it requires less time to dispense spots than to spread the microbe; (2) it uses fewer materials (15–20% of the laboratory supplies as the traditional methods); (3) it requires less effort; and (4) since the sample is distributed in distinct spots, colony/plaque counting is faster and less labor intensive. The spot-titer method was found to economize resources without sacrificing accuracy or precision, and is a practical method for routine use in large matrix experiments (e.g., survival or disinfection studies) and enumeration of high-titer environmental samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology
Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underreporting and Underrepresentation of Race and Ethnicity in Head and Neck Cancer Trials, 2010-2020: A Systematic Review. RobotBASIC Control Architecture Model in Mobile Robots for the Development of Navigation Routes in Structured Environments Robot Double Adaptive Self-Organizing Organisms Using a Bio-Inspired Gene Regulatory Network Controller
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1