{"title":"首都的现代领土和(殖民)地理。最小的考古学","authors":"Horacio Machado Aráoz","doi":"10.11144/JAVERIANA.MYS19-39.TMGC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to provide a minimal archeology of some of the main theoretical links that influenced how the modern concept of territory was articulated. This inquiry seeks to bring to light the extent this construct has operated as a key mechanism for the gradual establishment and institutionalization of the colonial geography of capital as a global western domination system, in particular, as an hegemonic geopolitical core.","PeriodicalId":88590,"journal":{"name":"Memoria y sociedad : revista del Departamento de Historia y Geografia","volume":"19 1","pages":"174-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El territorio moderno y la geografía (colonial) del capital. Una arqueología mínima\",\"authors\":\"Horacio Machado Aráoz\",\"doi\":\"10.11144/JAVERIANA.MYS19-39.TMGC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article seeks to provide a minimal archeology of some of the main theoretical links that influenced how the modern concept of territory was articulated. This inquiry seeks to bring to light the extent this construct has operated as a key mechanism for the gradual establishment and institutionalization of the colonial geography of capital as a global western domination system, in particular, as an hegemonic geopolitical core.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memoria y sociedad : revista del Departamento de Historia y Geografia\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"174-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memoria y sociedad : revista del Departamento de Historia y Geografia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.MYS19-39.TMGC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoria y sociedad : revista del Departamento de Historia y Geografia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.MYS19-39.TMGC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
El territorio moderno y la geografía (colonial) del capital. Una arqueología mínima
This article seeks to provide a minimal archeology of some of the main theoretical links that influenced how the modern concept of territory was articulated. This inquiry seeks to bring to light the extent this construct has operated as a key mechanism for the gradual establishment and institutionalization of the colonial geography of capital as a global western domination system, in particular, as an hegemonic geopolitical core.