美国关于功能获得性研究的政策建议引发了全球性问题

J. Fox
{"title":"美国关于功能获得性研究的政策建议引发了全球性问题","authors":"J. Fox","doi":"10.1128/microbe.11.239.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Officials seem poised to accept the updated broad framework for assessing gain-of function (GoF) research proposals that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) developed last year, making it the basis for federal policy. As part of a painstaking vetting of those proposals, NSABB members presented their draft guidance publicly under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., in March, asking for feedback from scientific and science policy experts.","PeriodicalId":87479,"journal":{"name":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US Policy Proposals for Gain-of-Function Research Raise Global Questions\",\"authors\":\"J. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/microbe.11.239.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Officials seem poised to accept the updated broad framework for assessing gain-of function (GoF) research proposals that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) developed last year, making it the basis for federal policy. As part of a painstaking vetting of those proposals, NSABB members presented their draft guidance publicly under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., in March, asking for feedback from scientific and science policy experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.11.239.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.11.239.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

官员们似乎已经准备好接受国家生物安全科学顾问委员会(NSABB)去年制定的评估功能增益(GoF)研究建议的更新的广泛框架,使其成为联邦政策的基础。作为对这些提案进行艰苦审查的一部分,NSABB成员于3月在华盛顿特区的美国国家科学院(NAS)的主持下公开提交了他们的指导草案,征求科学和科学政策专家的反馈意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
US Policy Proposals for Gain-of-Function Research Raise Global Questions
Officials seem poised to accept the updated broad framework for assessing gain-of function (GoF) research proposals that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) developed last year, making it the basis for federal policy. As part of a painstaking vetting of those proposals, NSABB members presented their draft guidance publicly under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., in March, asking for feedback from scientific and science policy experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virome Affects Host Immune Status, Susceptibility to Range of Diseases Analysis Suggests Habitat, Lifestyle for Last Universal Common Ancestor Last of the Great Potterers: Would it be possible today for one inspired individual to make major contributions across a range of different scientific specialties? Take Note: Yeast Turns the Lichen Duet of Fungi and Algae into a Trio Zika Genome Sequences Set for Diagnostic, Vaccine Development Purposes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1