{"title":"美国关于功能获得性研究的政策建议引发了全球性问题","authors":"J. Fox","doi":"10.1128/microbe.11.239.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Officials seem poised to accept the updated broad framework for assessing gain-of function (GoF) research proposals that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) developed last year, making it the basis for federal policy. As part of a painstaking vetting of those proposals, NSABB members presented their draft guidance publicly under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., in March, asking for feedback from scientific and science policy experts.","PeriodicalId":87479,"journal":{"name":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US Policy Proposals for Gain-of-Function Research Raise Global Questions\",\"authors\":\"J. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/microbe.11.239.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Officials seem poised to accept the updated broad framework for assessing gain-of function (GoF) research proposals that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) developed last year, making it the basis for federal policy. As part of a painstaking vetting of those proposals, NSABB members presented their draft guidance publicly under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., in March, asking for feedback from scientific and science policy experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.11.239.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.11.239.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
US Policy Proposals for Gain-of-Function Research Raise Global Questions
Officials seem poised to accept the updated broad framework for assessing gain-of function (GoF) research proposals that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) developed last year, making it the basis for federal policy. As part of a painstaking vetting of those proposals, NSABB members presented their draft guidance publicly under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in Washington, D.C., in March, asking for feedback from scientific and science policy experts.