{"title":"1966年最重要的是什么?回顾50年前的一次重要会议,我们可以深入了解微生物学家当时认为的关键问题。改变了多少?","authors":"B. Dixon","doi":"10.1128/MICROBE.11.372.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Half a century ago, I was in Moscow, in the then Soviet Union, attending an International Congress of Microbiology. Although the passing of time seems unbelievable, the interval provides an opportunity to reconsider key topics which the organizers chose to focus attention on, since they were then major concerns for the profession. Some of those topics now appear surprising, some have declined in importance, and others have become more so.","PeriodicalId":87479,"journal":{"name":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Seemed Important in 1966?: Review of a major congress five decades ago provides insight into what microbiologists then rated as key issues. How much has changed?\",\"authors\":\"B. Dixon\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/MICROBE.11.372.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Half a century ago, I was in Moscow, in the then Soviet Union, attending an International Congress of Microbiology. Although the passing of time seems unbelievable, the interval provides an opportunity to reconsider key topics which the organizers chose to focus attention on, since they were then major concerns for the profession. Some of those topics now appear surprising, some have declined in importance, and others have become more so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/MICROBE.11.372.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/MICROBE.11.372.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Seemed Important in 1966?: Review of a major congress five decades ago provides insight into what microbiologists then rated as key issues. How much has changed?
Half a century ago, I was in Moscow, in the then Soviet Union, attending an International Congress of Microbiology. Although the passing of time seems unbelievable, the interval provides an opportunity to reconsider key topics which the organizers chose to focus attention on, since they were then major concerns for the profession. Some of those topics now appear surprising, some have declined in importance, and others have become more so.