Morgaen L. Donaldson, Madeline Mavrogordato, Shaun Dougherty, R. Ghanem, Peter A. Youngs
{"title":"中小学“每个学生都成功”法案下的校长评价:综合政策回顾","authors":"Morgaen L. Donaldson, Madeline Mavrogordato, Shaun Dougherty, R. Ghanem, Peter A. Youngs","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing body of research recognizes the critical role of the school principal, demonstrating that school principals’ effects on student outcomes are second only to those of teachers. Yet policy makers have often paid little attention to principals, choosing instead to focus policy reform on teachers. In the last decade, this pattern has shifted somewhat. Federal policies such as Race to the Top (RTTT) and Elementary and Secondary Education Act waivers emphasized principal quality and prompted many states to overhaul principal evaluation as a means to develop principals’ leadership practices and hold them accountable for the performance of their schools. The development and dissemination of principal evaluation policies has proceeded rapidly, however, it is unclear whether focusing on principal evaluation has targeted the most impactful policy lever. In this policy brief, we describe where policy makers have placed their bets in post-RTTT principal evaluation systems and comment on the wisdom of these wagers. We describe the degree to which principal evaluation components, processes, and consequences vary across the fifty states and the District of Columbia, and review evidence on which aspects of principal evaluation policies are most likely to improve principals’ practice and hold them accountable.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principal Evaluation under Elementary and Secondary Every Student Succeeds Act: A Comprehensive Policy Review\",\"authors\":\"Morgaen L. Donaldson, Madeline Mavrogordato, Shaun Dougherty, R. Ghanem, Peter A. Youngs\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/edfp_a_00332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A growing body of research recognizes the critical role of the school principal, demonstrating that school principals’ effects on student outcomes are second only to those of teachers. Yet policy makers have often paid little attention to principals, choosing instead to focus policy reform on teachers. In the last decade, this pattern has shifted somewhat. Federal policies such as Race to the Top (RTTT) and Elementary and Secondary Education Act waivers emphasized principal quality and prompted many states to overhaul principal evaluation as a means to develop principals’ leadership practices and hold them accountable for the performance of their schools. The development and dissemination of principal evaluation policies has proceeded rapidly, however, it is unclear whether focusing on principal evaluation has targeted the most impactful policy lever. In this policy brief, we describe where policy makers have placed their bets in post-RTTT principal evaluation systems and comment on the wisdom of these wagers. We describe the degree to which principal evaluation components, processes, and consequences vary across the fifty states and the District of Columbia, and review evidence on which aspects of principal evaluation policies are most likely to improve principals’ practice and hold them accountable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Finance and Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Finance and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00332\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
越来越多的研究认识到学校校长的关键作用,表明学校校长对学生成绩的影响仅次于教师。然而,政策制定者往往很少关注校长,而是选择将政策改革的重点放在教师身上。在过去十年中,这种模式有所改变。联邦政策,如“力争上游”(RTTT)和《中小学教育法》(Elementary and Secondary Education Act)的豁免,强调校长的质量,并促使许多州对校长评估进行全面改革,以此作为发展校长领导实践的一种手段,并让他们对学校的表现负责。主要评价政策的制定和传播进展迅速,但是,目前尚不清楚侧重主要评价是否针对最具影响力的政策杠杆。在本政策简报中,我们描述了政策制定者在rttt后的主要评估系统中下注的地方,并对这些赌注的智慧进行了评论。我们描述了五十个州和哥伦比亚特区的主要评估组成部分、过程和结果的不同程度,并审查了主要评估政策的哪些方面最有可能改善校长的实践并使他们负责任的证据。
Principal Evaluation under Elementary and Secondary Every Student Succeeds Act: A Comprehensive Policy Review
A growing body of research recognizes the critical role of the school principal, demonstrating that school principals’ effects on student outcomes are second only to those of teachers. Yet policy makers have often paid little attention to principals, choosing instead to focus policy reform on teachers. In the last decade, this pattern has shifted somewhat. Federal policies such as Race to the Top (RTTT) and Elementary and Secondary Education Act waivers emphasized principal quality and prompted many states to overhaul principal evaluation as a means to develop principals’ leadership practices and hold them accountable for the performance of their schools. The development and dissemination of principal evaluation policies has proceeded rapidly, however, it is unclear whether focusing on principal evaluation has targeted the most impactful policy lever. In this policy brief, we describe where policy makers have placed their bets in post-RTTT principal evaluation systems and comment on the wisdom of these wagers. We describe the degree to which principal evaluation components, processes, and consequences vary across the fifty states and the District of Columbia, and review evidence on which aspects of principal evaluation policies are most likely to improve principals’ practice and hold them accountable.