全球供给网络中的知识扩散:一个网络实践视角

IF 10.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Supply Chain Management Pub Date : 2019-10-30 DOI:10.1111/jscm.12214
Leonardo Marques, Tingting Yan, Lee Matthews
{"title":"全球供给网络中的知识扩散:一个网络实践视角","authors":"Leonardo Marques,&nbsp;Tingting Yan,&nbsp;Lee Matthews","doi":"10.1111/jscm.12214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates how knowledge diffusion occurs in a globally dispersed supply network, wherein buying firms and suppliers often do not have strong relationships and competitive tensions prevail. We elaborate the Network of Practice (NoP) view by examining a global supply network in the food sector that is as an exemplar of high global dispersion. This paper provides several novel insights into global knowledge diffusion. We introduce the NoP concept of <i>homophily</i> into the field of supply chain management to explain knowledge diffusion within global supply networks. We take a longitudinal perspective to show that although prior contractual ties (<i>relational homophily</i>) and co-location (<i>location homophily</i>) initially drive knowledge diffusion, in the long-term, shared practices (<i>practice homophily</i>) are the principal driver of knowledge diffusion. We demonstrate that buying firms’ assurance of <i>procedural justice</i>, together with the predominance of geographically dispersed suppliers and the emergence of <i>nexus members</i>, can help dampen supplier resistance to knowledge diffusion. The study shows that knowledge diffusion in a global supply NoP occurs in two complementary forms—broadcasting forums and action groups—which vary in breadth, depth, and tie diversity. Ultimately, we present vertical (buyer-supplier), horizontal (suppliersupplier), and diagonal (non-competitive) relationships as important refinements of the NoP view that characterize a global supply NoP. Overall, our findings offer a path for buying firms to establish adequate online infrastructure to support the emergence of decentralized and self-organized knowledge diffusion in a globally dispersed supply network.</p>","PeriodicalId":51392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supply Chain Management","volume":"56 1","pages":"33-53"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jscm.12214","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Diffusion in a Global Supply Network: A Network of Practice View\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Marques,&nbsp;Tingting Yan,&nbsp;Lee Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jscm.12214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates how knowledge diffusion occurs in a globally dispersed supply network, wherein buying firms and suppliers often do not have strong relationships and competitive tensions prevail. We elaborate the Network of Practice (NoP) view by examining a global supply network in the food sector that is as an exemplar of high global dispersion. This paper provides several novel insights into global knowledge diffusion. We introduce the NoP concept of <i>homophily</i> into the field of supply chain management to explain knowledge diffusion within global supply networks. We take a longitudinal perspective to show that although prior contractual ties (<i>relational homophily</i>) and co-location (<i>location homophily</i>) initially drive knowledge diffusion, in the long-term, shared practices (<i>practice homophily</i>) are the principal driver of knowledge diffusion. We demonstrate that buying firms’ assurance of <i>procedural justice</i>, together with the predominance of geographically dispersed suppliers and the emergence of <i>nexus members</i>, can help dampen supplier resistance to knowledge diffusion. The study shows that knowledge diffusion in a global supply NoP occurs in two complementary forms—broadcasting forums and action groups—which vary in breadth, depth, and tie diversity. Ultimately, we present vertical (buyer-supplier), horizontal (suppliersupplier), and diagonal (non-competitive) relationships as important refinements of the NoP view that characterize a global supply NoP. Overall, our findings offer a path for buying firms to establish adequate online infrastructure to support the emergence of decentralized and self-organized knowledge diffusion in a globally dispersed supply network.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supply Chain Management\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"33-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jscm.12214\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supply Chain Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jscm.12214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jscm.12214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本研究探讨了知识扩散如何在全球分散的供应网络中发生,其中采购公司和供应商通常没有牢固的关系,竞争紧张盛行。我们通过检查作为全球高度分散范例的食品部门的全球供应网络来阐述实践网络(NoP)观点。本文提供了一些关于全球知识扩散的新见解。我们将同质性的NoP概念引入供应链管理领域,以解释全球供应网络中的知识扩散。我们采用纵向视角来表明,尽管先前的契约关系(关系同质性)和共址(地点同质性)最初推动知识扩散,但从长期来看,共享实践(实践同质性)是知识扩散的主要驱动力。研究表明,采购企业对程序公正的保证,以及地理上分散的供应商的优势和关系成员的出现,有助于抑制供应商对知识扩散的抵制。研究表明,全球供给NoP中的知识扩散以两种互补的形式发生——广播论坛和行动小组——其广度、深度和多样性各不相同。最后,我们提出了垂直(买方-供应商)、水平(供应商-供应商)和对角线(非竞争)关系,作为NoP视图的重要改进,它们表征了全球供应NoP。总体而言,我们的研究结果为采购企业建立足够的在线基础设施提供了一条路径,以支持在全球分散的供应网络中出现分散和自组织的知识扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge Diffusion in a Global Supply Network: A Network of Practice View

This study investigates how knowledge diffusion occurs in a globally dispersed supply network, wherein buying firms and suppliers often do not have strong relationships and competitive tensions prevail. We elaborate the Network of Practice (NoP) view by examining a global supply network in the food sector that is as an exemplar of high global dispersion. This paper provides several novel insights into global knowledge diffusion. We introduce the NoP concept of homophily into the field of supply chain management to explain knowledge diffusion within global supply networks. We take a longitudinal perspective to show that although prior contractual ties (relational homophily) and co-location (location homophily) initially drive knowledge diffusion, in the long-term, shared practices (practice homophily) are the principal driver of knowledge diffusion. We demonstrate that buying firms’ assurance of procedural justice, together with the predominance of geographically dispersed suppliers and the emergence of nexus members, can help dampen supplier resistance to knowledge diffusion. The study shows that knowledge diffusion in a global supply NoP occurs in two complementary forms—broadcasting forums and action groups—which vary in breadth, depth, and tie diversity. Ultimately, we present vertical (buyer-supplier), horizontal (suppliersupplier), and diagonal (non-competitive) relationships as important refinements of the NoP view that characterize a global supply NoP. Overall, our findings offer a path for buying firms to establish adequate online infrastructure to support the emergence of decentralized and self-organized knowledge diffusion in a globally dispersed supply network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: ournal of Supply Chain Management Mission: The mission of the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) is to be the premier choice among supply chain management scholars from various disciplines. It aims to attract high-quality, impactful behavioral research that focuses on theory building and employs rigorous empirical methodologies. Article Requirements: An article published in JSCM must make a significant contribution to supply chain management theory. This contribution can be achieved through either an inductive, theory-building process or a deductive, theory-testing approach. This contribution may manifest in various ways, such as falsification of conventional understanding, theory-building through conceptual development, inductive or qualitative research, initial empirical testing of a theory, theoretically-based meta-analysis, or constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory. Theoretical Contribution: Manuscripts should explicitly convey the theoretical contribution relative to the existing supply chain management literature, and when appropriate, to the literature outside of supply chain management (e.g., management theory, psychology, economics). Empirical Contribution: Manuscripts published in JSCM must also provide strong empirical contributions. While conceptual manuscripts are welcomed, they must significantly advance theory in the field of supply chain management and be firmly grounded in existing theory and relevant literature. For empirical manuscripts, authors must adequately assess validity, which is essential for empirical research, whether quantitative or qualitative.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Process Research Methods for Studying Supply Chains and Their Management Rethinking Supply Chain Management in a Post-Growth Era Unraveling the Urban Ecosystem: An Ethnographic Study of Logistics Service Providers “I Am Because We Are”: The Role of Sub-Saharan Africa's Collectivist Culture in Achieving Traceability and Global Supply Chain Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1