瓦萨里:在典范和他自己的肖像之间

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Explorations in Renaissance Culture Pub Date : 2013-12-02 DOI:10.1163/23526963-90000441
Émilie Passignat
{"title":"瓦萨里:在典范和他自己的肖像之间","authors":"Émilie Passignat","doi":"10.1163/23526963-90000441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most critics, now and in the past, Giorgio Vasari is-first and foremost-the author of Le vite de' piu eccellenti pittori, scultori e architettori. Vasari's artistic work-in particular, his paintinghas instead remained rather at the edge of the attention of scholars, when compared to the immense literature that continues to fuel the bibliography of his Le Vite, undoubtedly a work of undeniable and fundamental importance. Vasari's long and ambiguous fate among critics is marked by some bias: on the one hand, it stems from his parochialism in Le Vite, in favor of the Tuscans; on the other hand, it originates in the unanimous condemnation of Mannerism during past centuries, reevaluated only during the twentieth century. Yet Vasari's work has never remained unnoticed through the years; it has always become a fundamental point of reference. In 2011 on the occasion of the five hundreth anniversary of his birth, Vasari was heavily discussed with an approach much less bound and conditioned by the ideas of the critics in the past. There were so many celebrations organized in his honor that we can call it a pure and true consecration. Almost as it were a myth, and a myth is not born by itself Much of this success should primarily be attributed to the artist himself Vasari was an incomparable artisan of his own image, in passing it on to posterity, supported in this effort by his acquaintances he chose accurately, and later because of the work and contributions of his heirs, which are still unappreciated to this day.! In light of these observations, the scope of this essay is to highlight the fact that Vasari might not have entrusted the task of the artists' posthumous fame, and the claim of their new social status obtained in the sixteenth century, only to his Le Vite, but also how, through his entire artistic career and under different forms of communication, he was deeply committed and dedicated to achieving these goals. Indeed, this essay is about investigating Vasari's self-portrayal: how he describes himself in relation to his own art, thus proposing an interpretation more cross-sectional of the style in which Vasari builds his own image through the years; observing more attentively his portraits, self-portraits, and some of his works painted in residences in Arezzo and Florence; and finally, by considering the important work the Ragionamenti.","PeriodicalId":55910,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","volume":"39 1","pages":"85-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23526963-90000441","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vasari: Between the Paragone and the Portraits of Himself\",\"authors\":\"Émilie Passignat\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23526963-90000441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most critics, now and in the past, Giorgio Vasari is-first and foremost-the author of Le vite de' piu eccellenti pittori, scultori e architettori. Vasari's artistic work-in particular, his paintinghas instead remained rather at the edge of the attention of scholars, when compared to the immense literature that continues to fuel the bibliography of his Le Vite, undoubtedly a work of undeniable and fundamental importance. Vasari's long and ambiguous fate among critics is marked by some bias: on the one hand, it stems from his parochialism in Le Vite, in favor of the Tuscans; on the other hand, it originates in the unanimous condemnation of Mannerism during past centuries, reevaluated only during the twentieth century. Yet Vasari's work has never remained unnoticed through the years; it has always become a fundamental point of reference. In 2011 on the occasion of the five hundreth anniversary of his birth, Vasari was heavily discussed with an approach much less bound and conditioned by the ideas of the critics in the past. There were so many celebrations organized in his honor that we can call it a pure and true consecration. Almost as it were a myth, and a myth is not born by itself Much of this success should primarily be attributed to the artist himself Vasari was an incomparable artisan of his own image, in passing it on to posterity, supported in this effort by his acquaintances he chose accurately, and later because of the work and contributions of his heirs, which are still unappreciated to this day.! In light of these observations, the scope of this essay is to highlight the fact that Vasari might not have entrusted the task of the artists' posthumous fame, and the claim of their new social status obtained in the sixteenth century, only to his Le Vite, but also how, through his entire artistic career and under different forms of communication, he was deeply committed and dedicated to achieving these goals. Indeed, this essay is about investigating Vasari's self-portrayal: how he describes himself in relation to his own art, thus proposing an interpretation more cross-sectional of the style in which Vasari builds his own image through the years; observing more attentively his portraits, self-portraits, and some of his works painted in residences in Arezzo and Florence; and finally, by considering the important work the Ragionamenti.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explorations in Renaissance Culture\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"85-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23526963-90000441\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explorations in Renaissance Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526963-90000441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526963-90000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于大多数评论家来说,无论是现在还是过去,乔治·瓦萨里首先是《优秀的建筑师、雕塑家和建筑师》一书的作者。瓦萨里的艺术作品,尤其是他的绘画,一直处于学者们关注的边缘,而与之相比,大量的文献继续为他的《生活》提供参考书目,毫无疑问,《生活》是一部不可否认的、至关重要的作品。瓦萨里在评论家中漫长而模棱两可的命运带有一些偏见:一方面,这源于他对《生活》的狭隘主义,支持托斯卡纳人;另一方面,它起源于过去几个世纪对矫饰主义的一致谴责,直到20世纪才得到重新评价。然而,多年来,瓦萨里的作品从未被忽视;它总是成为一个基本的参考点。2011年,在瓦萨里诞辰500周年之际,人们对他进行了大量的讨论,其方式与过去评论家的观点相比,受到的束缚和限制要少得多。人们为纪念他举办了许多庆祝活动,我们可以称之为纯粹而真正的奉献。这几乎是一个神话,而一个神话不是自己产生的,这在很大程度上应该归功于艺术家本人。瓦萨里是一个无与伦比的工匠,他把自己的形象传给了后代,在这方面,他的努力得到了他准确选择的熟人的支持,后来又因为他的继承人的工作和贡献,这些工作和贡献直到今天仍然没有得到赞赏。鉴于这些观察,本文的范围是要强调这样一个事实,即瓦萨里可能没有委托艺术家的死后名声的任务,以及他们在16世纪获得的新社会地位的要求,只有他的Le Vite,而且如何,通过他的整个艺术生涯和不同形式的交流,他深深承诺并致力于实现这些目标。事实上,这篇文章是关于调查瓦萨里的自我写照:他如何描述自己与他自己的艺术,从而提出了一种更横截面的解释,瓦萨里多年来建立自己的形象;更仔细地观察他的肖像画、自画像和他在阿雷佐和佛罗伦萨的住宅里画的一些作品;最后,考虑一下重要的著作《理性修正》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vasari: Between the Paragone and the Portraits of Himself
For most critics, now and in the past, Giorgio Vasari is-first and foremost-the author of Le vite de' piu eccellenti pittori, scultori e architettori. Vasari's artistic work-in particular, his paintinghas instead remained rather at the edge of the attention of scholars, when compared to the immense literature that continues to fuel the bibliography of his Le Vite, undoubtedly a work of undeniable and fundamental importance. Vasari's long and ambiguous fate among critics is marked by some bias: on the one hand, it stems from his parochialism in Le Vite, in favor of the Tuscans; on the other hand, it originates in the unanimous condemnation of Mannerism during past centuries, reevaluated only during the twentieth century. Yet Vasari's work has never remained unnoticed through the years; it has always become a fundamental point of reference. In 2011 on the occasion of the five hundreth anniversary of his birth, Vasari was heavily discussed with an approach much less bound and conditioned by the ideas of the critics in the past. There were so many celebrations organized in his honor that we can call it a pure and true consecration. Almost as it were a myth, and a myth is not born by itself Much of this success should primarily be attributed to the artist himself Vasari was an incomparable artisan of his own image, in passing it on to posterity, supported in this effort by his acquaintances he chose accurately, and later because of the work and contributions of his heirs, which are still unappreciated to this day.! In light of these observations, the scope of this essay is to highlight the fact that Vasari might not have entrusted the task of the artists' posthumous fame, and the claim of their new social status obtained in the sixteenth century, only to his Le Vite, but also how, through his entire artistic career and under different forms of communication, he was deeply committed and dedicated to achieving these goals. Indeed, this essay is about investigating Vasari's self-portrayal: how he describes himself in relation to his own art, thus proposing an interpretation more cross-sectional of the style in which Vasari builds his own image through the years; observing more attentively his portraits, self-portraits, and some of his works painted in residences in Arezzo and Florence; and finally, by considering the important work the Ragionamenti.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Explorations in Renaissance Culture
Explorations in Renaissance Culture MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitating Reputation in Early Modern Venice: Pietro Zen as Repainter of History in Mamluk Damascus The Steadfast Loyalty of Mary, Countess of Shrewsbury, ‘the Only Contriver of Bedlam Opposition’: The SCRC Hunter Lecture, 2023 Fields Award 2022 From the Editor—Call for Papers and Fiftieth Anniversary of Explorations Popular Participation in Renaissance Siena’s Romanitas Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1